You are finally getting your product as Chief of Asian Operations on the Apollo!
Well done, Vinaire.
You had to leave Scientology and just do it yourself.
Now THAT is making it go right!
Thank you, bro'.
I do believe that Scientology data can be greatly simplified; and to the degree it is simplified it will become easier to understand and apply. But then it would not be Scientology. It would be something else.
A great simplification would come about if the stress is put on LOOKING. This means looking at the response that the mind brings up when a question is asked. This also means the recognition of “no response” when the mind does not bring up anything when a question is asked. The moment one fails to recognize a “no response,” and bypasses the mind in search of a possible answer, one has invalidated one’s own sense of LOOKING.
One’s own sense of LOOKING can easily be developed to a point that it is much more accurate than the accuracy of auditor noticing a floating needle. Just throw away the e-meter and go by LOOKING (recognizing a response, or a lack of it). You will get much better and faster results then.
Not all processes may be right when the mind wants to un-stack itself in a certain order. You just run a bunch of processes to get whatever charge you can get off. Then you run the same bunch of processes again and you will get more charge off. A process that didn’t get any charge off the first time, may get quite a bit of charge off a second time. It all depends on what the mind wants to unload at what point. Mind has a keen sense of self-protection. The order in which the mind allows itself to be unloaded depends on that sense of self-protection. That sense should never be violated.
I would do the whole lower bridge without the e-meter, simply on the basis of LOOKING as described above. I would then do the whole lower bridge once again with LOOKING . I may even do it a third and a fourth time the same way with LOOKING. I will get more charge off in much less “total time” if I do this because I would not be needing any repairs at all.
This is what I mean by simplifying Scientology. A lot of complexity in Scientology is of its own making. All that Repair Tech was developed because inordinate faith was put into the e-meter. Maybe there are some inherent limitations in using the e-meter. Anyway, the sense of LOOKING is much more accurate and can be developed easily. If LOOKING is stressed, then more auditing will occur, and there will be greater gains in much less time.
Note: It may not be appropriate to refer to this new approach as auditing, as it would be something completely different.
.
