AnonOrange said> US employers technically don't have to provide retirement and many do, but they MUST withhold SS, medicare and match with equal funds. That's an absolute must regardless of the wages paid.
HolyCow said> So Anon, does this mean people like me showing $0 on SS and medicare while staff in SO have dox proof? And continuing... does the social sec earnings show proof of wages under minimum and all that? Just askin'
Here's a video, that KESQ TV dated March 31, 2009, highlighting former Sea Org staff member, Maureen Bolstad. Review the video section starting at 2:55 (2 minutes and 55 seconds).
www.youtube.com/watch?v=o44_TPWVRVM
The following information is US oriented. The first form shown is an
annual employer-employee tax form, which each employer is required to provide each employee, each year. The employer is also required to send a copy to the state and feds. The employee takes their copy of that form (one for each employer) to their tax preparer, to prepare their taxes each year. I'm not sure what the minimum amount required to file taxes is, but I suspect Sea Org staff fall below it, and are not required to file taxes. And if an employee doesn't file, I'm not sure what information would be retained. The form pictured in this video does not show the amount deducted for SS tax. But I'm pretty sure it was deducted and hopefully passed onto each government taxing authority.
The second form shown is an
aggregate tax form, showing earnings for each individual year, which the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) mails annually to each taxpayer. It only lists the year, SSN earnings, and medicare earnings. But it does not list the amounts actually withheld. And I'm not sure where that information may be retained. In Bolstad's case; All figures shown are blank for 1986 thru 1993. My theory is, the forms that scientology sent to the IRS each year, didn't get posted to her account, because she didn't file tax returns during those years. And she probably wasn't required to file, because her income was below the minimum filing amount. So just because an employer (scientology in this case) says they withheld SS money, doesn't mean the IRS is going to post that amount on a taxpayers form, if the employee didn't file a return. And if not, I'm not sure if or where those amounts would be listed. That's my theory. In the news clip, KESW mentions that she broke a camera once, and scientology took it out of her pay.
----- Below is off topic -----
On another note, I remember when the IRS began mailing out these annual forms, roughly 15 to 20 years ago. I was amazed. All my life I'd heard about how incompetent the government, and the IRS were, and I believed it, because everybody said it was so. But I spent a fair amount of my time auditing their annual salary-SSN-Medicare figures, and I was truly impressed. The information went back to my first job, at which point I went out and got a SSN number. Every tax return that I'd prepared over the years, some of them ancient, matched the IRS annual form to a T. The IRS knows every place I've every worked, and thus who I worked with, the physical addresses my taxes were mailed to over the years, which can easily be converted into 9-digit zip-codes, which gets them to within a few feet of my home, so they know who all my neighbors were over the years, where they worked, and how much money they made. In addition, these days if a parent wants to claim a child as a deduction they must get them a Social Security Number (SSN) at birth. I'm not sure when that became a requirement. But anybody who's about 25 or so, they know this information about them from childhood.
Everything is based of SSN, the "key" field, consider that you have to provide your SSN to get health insurance, a drivers license, a bank account, credit cards, phone number, insurance, etc. People with access to those databases, can tie everything together. If you have access to the right databases, you can tie them together in so many ways I can't imagine which. For example, let's take the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It's their job to know which geographic areas are toxic. Let's say during WW1 or WW2 the government looked the other way, while some environmentally toxic or nuclear toxic substances were manufactured in a certain area, or near a particular river. Those 9-digit zip codes (another "key" field) would be in an EPA databases. Let's say a lot of people who lived in a certain zip code started developing a certain type of cancer (another "key" field). Anybody with the right access would know the right areas to move into, or avoid. Which areas to locate a school into because it was a safe zone. Which areas to not build on, or to locate a trailer park on because it was known to be toxic. In other words if they tied together hospital, or health insurance records with IRS records of your home addresses over the years, and your family members, and children who are dependents, you'd know who else was likely to come down with the same disease. It may not be perfect, but it would be accurate enough to be scary. I once attended a funeral for somebody who lived at a trailer park, and who died of cancer. After the funeral a bunch of people got together, and somebody said, "a lot" of people who lived in that trailer park have died of cancer of the years. I pursued it and asked what does "a lot" of people mean 5 or 7? They said, "no try 'dozens' of people" who died of cancer over the years, and who lived at that trailer park over a period of time. It turned out this person had lived there a long time, and was the type that gets out and about, and knows everybody, and talks a lot. When they said it was dozens, the air went out of the room, because a lot of the people present also lived at that park. And considering that people move around a lot, and cancer takes so long to kill someone, it might be hard for most people to catch. Rather than constructing an apartment building on that land, was this the reason they built a trailer park, being able to move these residences out at will? And maybe also the reason that residents had to be 55 or older, with not as much time to live, avoiding children residents? And then if you tie those toxic zip codes together, with the IRS database of people who lived there over the years, with the health insurance records showing the types of cancer people died of, you'd start to see some trends. The safest place to live and go to school, is where the EPA chief goes. By now insurance companies must be able to assess risk, and determine premiums based on such information.
As a reminder, all content that I post at ESMB, under the name of CornPie, past, present or future, I place in the public domain.