What's new

Dope-off. What Is It?

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
What is dope-off really? I'm not sure. It seems like I know how to fix it, but not what it is. I've been meaning to post about this on the Havingness thread, but I'll give it its own thread.

Rog just mentioned it in another thread on misunderstoods. He said:

My observation of students is that the "unconsciousness" that turns on is not typically the result of going past a MU, but going past a not fully comprehended and in particular words, terms, symbols for which one does not have a full and clear comprehension of . . . for it here that the student fails to attain his/her objective/purpose for engaging in the study, i.e., to comprehend and be aware of what is being attempted to be learned.

That failure, in my observation, is what is behind the dope-off.

People who have MU's but do not know it don't do the dope-if trick :biggrin:

I discovered how to fix dope-off in early 2006. I wrote up my first use of it in this archived article here. The fix? Vigorous contact with the physical universe, like stamping feet on the floor, rubbing the body hard, smacking fists on the table — exactly what I recommend to get one's Havingness in better shape. But it has to be done urgently before you fall asleep. Standing up is an excellent first step as it is very hard (but not impossible) to fall asleep standing up.

As I mentioned in that write-up, I found that one of three things occurred when I was running thoroughly-grooved in items (like 5 minutes of grooving in. Details at that link in the paragraph above), and had "put the topic above me" (the first step of the 6-direction process). The three possible results were:
  • it's undercharged (or uncharged) and nothing happens, or
  • it's overcharged and I go anaten (unconscious) to some extent, in which case I run Hav until . . .
  • it's just right and the charge comes off as yawns, sigh, tears, etc.

In the 6 years since coming up with that I have not changed my mind about it. I found every single instance of anaten/unconsciousness/dope-off etc. in session (or in life) is immediately fixable by a vigorous Hav process (I'm talking about real Hav processes like push on the wall, not Hubbard fluff processes like put some emotion into your asshole). It might take several minutes of very hard physical activity, not merely a pat or two.

I remember one observation of Hubbard's on some ProTRs course that unconsciousness is one way a being can non-confront something. I find with myself that if I run into a problem with something — even very low-powered problems like a bit of coding I have to think about or a tricky crossword clue — I start to go unconscious to some extent. So possibly Hubbard was right about that bit.

His thing about an engram containing unconsciousness makes sense in these terms. Although engram is such an emotive word on ESMB that I won't use it again here! I would say that any incident or any topic that is charged contains unconsciousness. The unconsciousness comes off (disappears) as the charge is dissipated.

Let's see. . . .

If a "charged" topic that one addresses in session, and releases the charge from using Rub & Yawn or some other procedure, is more or less a glob of disharmonious energy-consciousness, and the processing removes the disharmony, what is observed to release is (1) the "bad" energy in terms of yawns, sighs, belches etc. (2) the "bad" feelings, thoughts, sensations etc.

In my terms, it would seem that one is surrounded by pockets of disharmony in one's auric field (or even further out) that one may or may not have attention on. Put attention on one such glob strongly enough and it will dig its hooks into one, so to speak, as it is made of similar stuff. At that point one of the three conditions listed above will obtain.

This seems very similar to what Hubbard described, in terms of key-ins and the mechanics of auditing where the auditor deliberately restimulates something in order to run it out or maybe just in order to dick with it.

This post is getting too long. All for now.

Paul
 

La La Lou Lou

Crusader
For whatever reason I noticed when I was staff in London that most people started to be sleepy at about 3pm. My understanding was that regardless of whether I would be 'in study' or shuffling papers I would tend to have to fight to stay awake around that time. I noticed the same thing on others too. Students and staff would get a bit slow, eyes glaze over, or in human terms simply overdue a cat nap.

My specialist into chronic fatigue syndrome has the theory that humans are designed for about three hours of hard work a day, chasing animals, digging out roots etc. A hectic 24/7 life like a staff member has is severely unnatural and will have consequences. It's OK to chase mammoths over cliffs, but you have to sit under a tree scratching your belly, belching and sleeping too.

Now I know when I'm non confronting and my body is demanding sleep I let it have it's twenty minutes sleep, my batteries are recharged and I can start to solve problems again.

Sorry if it's not linked to big black boulders floating in space, or the after effects of having flu in volcanoes. Simply put, my word clearing chains all were due to me simply being tired in the first place. A good night's sleep is important but so is a power nap.
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
For whatever reason I noticed when I was staff in London that most people started to be sleepy at about 3pm.

I noticed with me that I got sleepy a couple of hours after lunch. At one time it was due to drinking milk, and if I didn't drink milk I didn't get sleepy. At other times it's related to blood sugar (the insulin hit as an over-reaction to too much sugar too fast). I found one solution is not to eat lunch, but that isn't the best solution!

Paul
 

RogerB

Crusader
Oh, shit . . . I've sparked some more brilliance in Paul!:biggrin: :ohmy:

My take on it ,Mate . . . and these are simple observations, not a definitive study of it, is this.

Hubbard did say somewhere along the line that "tiredness," Sleepiness," "dope-off" and all those similar going unconscious scenarios is variously caused by O/R, failed purposes, low have, and I forget what else :melodramatic:

But in looking at these issues based on my experience with Alan's tech, I've come to a whole different, and I believe, more accurate and comprehensive understanding of it all.

Things gone on too long that induce boredom will put one into dope-off mode . . . gone on too longs or O/Rs put us in the realm of not wanting to experience PT and what's going on in it . . . and this kills havingness.

On the other thread, I didn't get into this aspect of it thoroughly . . . but anything that occludes or causes us to want to not experience causes a drop in havingness.

Similarly, this type of KO of our key ability, power and want of experience acts as a failed purpose.

Deep down at a basic spiritual level, these items of gone on too long, O/R, failed purpose, non-comprehension all are related. Alan noted in his lectures that the basic reason the universe of "The Heavens" or also called The Supreme Beings Universe declined and broke up was due to "having gone on too long" and non-comprehension. I find that to be true. That early universe ended up as a failed purpose and appears to be a basic on this unwanted experience, loss of hav and "unconsciousness" and dope off thing.

Your bright action of getting the person up and engaged in a new endeavor such as pounding the wall or getting intent of feeling the physical universe . . . does, at a minimum, give the guy two things: a) a new short term purpose to carry out and b) some use of the basic ability that is central to havingness: that of engaging in experience of the PT environment.

Thems my quick thoughts on it :p

Rog
 

RogerB

Crusader
Yes, and sometimes a nap is just a nap! :biggrin:

How very human of you!:dieslaughing::dieslaughing::dieslaughing: Enjoying naps, we were told by Hubbard, is not on for "thetans" and and mere staff members :duh::duh:

It is true that, as has been noted, certain foods will trigger body reactions that KO's a person's awakeness.

ANd we are not talking lack of sleep here either . . . Paul is exploring the genesis of the case generated dope-off phenomena.

R
 
I read somewhere the afternoon drowzies were a harmonic of the deepest sleep experienced 12 hrs past - like the 2 -3 am zzzzzzs

And another, was that dehydration is a cause of the drowzies. All it said was: to pop awake, all you need to do is hydrate.

Mims.
 

Kutta

Silver Meritorious Patron
Reading this thread, I'm feeling really drowzy. It's 10.16am here, but I think I'll just crawl back into bed and sleep it off. :biggrin:
 

secretiveoldfag

Silver Meritorious Patron
Re: Havingness. What Is It?

Dear Rog

Forgive the side issue.

I was never able to swallow LRH even in a homeopathic dose but have tried to keep up with the jargon. However I do feel, since this is an Ex Sci MB that the jargon should be translated for the benefit of the ignorant.

I can't find havingness in my dictionary and suspect it is Hubbardese and not an accepted word in the English language.

Using Hubspeak is a bad habit IMO; it may perpetuate other mental tendencies and certainly cuts off its users from normal communication. :yes:
 

Jquepublic

Silver Meritorious Patron
I'm curious about this too, because it doesn't only take place as a result of Scientology processes but shamanic practices too and for me even meditation can cause it. I was looking for an explanation for it in some of Jung's research that tie in with shamanic thinking and think it happens when you tap into what he sometimes referred to as the collective unconscious. I can appreciate what you're using as a remedy, Paul, but I need to find something that I can do that won't drag me out of a meditative state. I need to push through the dope off into the experience.

I'm just not sure what to do yet.
 
Last edited:

Axiom142

Gold Meritorious Patron
Interesting Paul. Dope-off definitely does occur, but the question is, why?

This sort of thing where Hubbard would just make a statement such as “When you goof the floof, you go all floofy-doofy.” Why not give us the mechanism behind this phenomenon? Surely that would help us to better understand what was being taught?

Now I realise that Hubbard didn’t actually know why these things were happening and just observed certain things. Or more probably, others observed them and he wrote them up and took credit for them.

And in any case, I’m pretty much ‘meh’ now. I’m really not that bothered any more.

But ‘dope-off’ does appear to be a valid phenomenon, but I think that there are other causes other than going past a word or symbol that you didn’t understand (M/U). For example, Between 30 mins and an hour after having lunch, I quite often feel drowsy and sometimes struggle to stay awake. This was particularly annoying when I was in the courseroom and there was some martinet supervisor who insisted that I find the offending word rather than take a brisk walk and yell some rude words, in order to wake up. Eventually, I learned not to argue and made sure that I ‘found’ a word or two and thanked them for their help. :thumbsup:

Something that a guy told me at St Hill once, actually seemed to make a lot of sense, at least at the time. His explanation was that when you were reading (or listening to) something and you didn’t understand something, you were in effect, out of communication with the physical universe. This resulted in ‘an earlier similar’ restimulation of another time when you were out of communication with the physical universe, i.e. being unconscious and thus you started to become less conscious in PT.

So there you have it, a complete explanation courtesy of John Wadey, formerly of Brunel University, the Stock Exchange and latterly of the Sea Org at St Hill.

Of course this only really sounds feasible if you believe in Hubbard’s concept of ‘earlier similar on the chain’ etc. Personally I’m not so convinced anymore, but in any case it would sensible to know the meaning of the words that you are reading. Looking stuff up in a dictionary makes sense.

Axiom142
 

Bill

Gold Meritorious Patron
Or,
  1. Few people actually get adequate sleep these days.
  2. If they are sitting in a warm, quiet room with little to stimulate them, many people will tend to fall asleep.
  3. When that happens, if they move about briskly ("Get the blood flowing", my mom used to say), they will wake back up.
Or,
No, I don't believe in "dope-off" as a study "phenomenon" -- nor do I believe anyone needs any Scientology terminology or "technology" to deal with feeling sleepy in a quiet, warm room.
 

TheRealNoUser

Patron with Honors
snip...
I'm talking about real Hav processes like push on the wall, not Hubbard fluff processes like put some emotion into your asshole...snip
Paul
I understand that D.M. actually recommends receiving emotion in the asshole while pushing on a wall. It is his "Process Order Of the Day", and the emotion is often provided to him by Class V Auditor / O.T. Superstar / B.F.F. - Mr. TC himself. It always cures his tendency to dope-off. Then they go and ride their motorcycles together, while smiling at each other in a very O.T. yet curious manner.
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
But in looking at these issues based on my experience with Alan's tech, I've come to a whole different, and I believe, more accurate and comprehensive understanding of it all.

Things gone on too long that induce boredom will put one into dope-off mode . . . gone on too longs or O/Rs put us in the realm of not wanting to experience PT and what's going on in it . . . and this kills havingness.

On the other thread, I didn't get into this aspect of it thoroughly . . . but anything that occludes or causes us to want to not experience causes a drop in havingness.

Similarly, this type of KO of our key ability, power and want of experience acts as a failed purpose.<snip>

Thank you for your thoughts. My comments on them follow. :)

It's all think! Nothing but think!​

Charged topics, like life, exist on several levels. The levels do interact inductively on each other, but it is a lot more efficient to address each directly (not necessarily one by one, although that can be done).

You can address a person mainly on a physical level, by a massage, say. A person can feel wonderful after a good massage, with no talking whatsoever. In fact it would be a distraction, as one just wants to relax and "be a body" for a while.

A person can address a topic mainly through the physical etheric band of sensation, effort etc. In recreating an incident or series of incidents to run, the client mainly focuses on recreating the efforts, the masses, the pressures, the sensations, the pains, without worrying about the think.

A person can address a topic through the emotional level. In recreating an incident or series of incidents to run, the client mainly focuses on recreating the emotions, the feelings in the incident, without worrying about the think.

A person can address a topic through the mental level. In recreating an incident or series of incidents to run, here the client mainly focuses on recreating the thoughts in the incident.

A person can address a topic focusing mainly on the higher spiritual levels too.

-----

This fits in with the subtle energy model of a person as per my usual illustration. The blue level next to the skin* is the physical etheric level holding the sensations, the next level with the coloured blobs is the emotional level, the thick yellow level next is the mental level, with the higher levels outside those. If one conducts all auditing on the mental yellow level, the only way of getting at stuff in the other levels is by induction. Changes at the mental level will impinge on the emotional level, but it is not the same as addressing the emotional level directly. I mean, look at the enormous difference between saying, "I was pretty unhappy with it" and sobbing your eyes out for ten minutes.

aura_4.jpg


Session dope-off (not low blood-sugar) might start at a think level, but by the time it has got to the body level (body starts to go to sleep) it is difficult to handle from a think approach. In session with an auditor right there it is still possible, because the auditor will stay awake and kick the pc awake enough to keep looking with what little awareness is left and answer the questions enough to finally dig him out. But solo? Forget it. I remember solo auditing sessions in the CofS where I got lots of sleep slumped over a correction list. The staff didn't really care as it was "auditing hours"!

Standing up and pounding the wall is not at the think level at all. And it is a very effective solo auditing (or PaulsRobot, more to the point) tool in one's arsenal. Very very effective. PaulsRobot wouldn't work without it because most of the procedures are very intense. The general expectation is a 20-30 minute hell-for-leather session with the blood (well, yawns etc.) flying, not a 2 hour gentile question-and-answer session. And deliberately going after something with that much charge can easily result in being overwhumped — STAND UP! immediately and stamp your feet and so forth and we're off to the races; slump forward and try and find the right thoughts and you're laid out for half an hour.

Now, you still haven't found the reason for the dope-off, but in many cases it doesn't matter. If the reason is that one's topic is overcharged, the Rub & Yawn "remedy" for the dope-off will fix that all by itself by bleeding off the charge. If you're studying and get hit you would usually need to go back and try again, and maybe you'll get smacked again and maybe you won't. But as long as you have this jim-dandy remedy handy you don't need to fear getting knocked over by stuff you don't understand before you have time to sort it out.

So there. :)

Paul

*The levels interpenetrate each other and the body, not lie on top of each other like a parcel wrapped in several layers of paper. Each higher (thinner or finer) level extends out more than the one below. So the mental level still penetrates the entire physical body, but in terms of frequency is three levels removed.
 
Last edited:

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
If yawning as a sign of discharge is the same as dope off then psyches talk about it too.

Oh! Interesting references. Thanks very much.

I've found dope-off to be an indicator of over-restimulation, i.e. biting off energetically more than you can chew (release). Yawning indicates the release, where one is handling a bite-sized chunk. See the OP re the three reactions to contacting some possibly-charged topic:

The three possible results were:
  • it's undercharged (or uncharged) and nothing happens, or
  • it's overcharged and I go anaten (unconscious) to some extent, in which case I run Hav until . . .
  • it's just right and the charge comes off as yawns, sigh, tears, etc.

Paul
 

Boojuum

Silver Meritorious Patron
I think of two reasons for dope off: The first being the obvious--the need to sleep. Many, many times "morning TR's" were simply an excuse to nod off for a few minutes and wake up refreshed. That was fairly common in the 70's.

The second reason is too much inflow that you aren't fully engaged with. It's easy to fix by reversing the flow and talking to someone. Many, many times while studying, I'd notice a need to simply outflow what I was studying. If I had the opportunity to explain what I was studying to a word clearer or supervisor or even a twin, the information would come alive and I'd be engaged again. I think this is a wonderful effect of careful, supportive study and more powerful than word clearing. I think this same effect happens to an auditor or to someone listening to a tedious speaker. I can't quite bring myself to credit LRH with this but he does touch on it in Dianetics 55! I think it's a missing piece of study tech.
 

Jquepublic

Silver Meritorious Patron
Oh! Interesting references. Thanks very much.

I've found dope-off to be an indicator of over-restimulation, i.e. biting off energetically more than you can chew (release). Yawning indicates the release, where one is handling a bite-sized chunk. See the OP re the three reactions to contacting some possibly-charged topic:



Paul

So then when you find dope-off occurring more often than not, you'd undercut? Find a way to buffer it? I'm not sold on the idea that it's not something you can solo. I don't want that to be the answer. :p
 
Or,
  1. Few people actually get adequate sleep these days.
  2. If they are sitting in a warm, quiet room with little to stimulate them, many people will tend to fall asleep.
  3. When that happens, if they move about briskly ("Get the blood flowing", my mom used to say), they will wake back up.
Or,
No, I don't believe in "dope-off" as a study "phenomenon" -- nor do I believe anyone needs any Scientology terminology or "technology" to deal with feeling sleepy in a quiet, warm room.

I've seen it too often in others to dismiss it as false. Most recently last night. Paul's op though makes some interesting observations though. They are ones to which I want to give some consideration.


Mark A. Baker
 
Top