What's new

electromagnetic activity and the mind & emeters

If this is true - how does the e-meter affect our brains?
Solar flare: The sun touches our psyche

WASHINGTON, March 8, 2012 - Maybe it is time to wear tin foil on our heads. With high electromagnetic activity from the sun coming this way, our human electromagnetic fields may start glowing.

Even if we do not begin incandescing, scientists have noticed correlations between solar flares and moods.

Solar Effects

From 1948 to 1997, the Institute of North Industrial Ecology Problems in Russia found that geomagnetic activity showed three seasonal peaks each of those years (March to May, in July, and in October). Every peak matched an increased incidence of anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and suicide in the city Kirovsk.

Solar Effects


From 1948 to 1997, the Institute of North Industrial Ecology Problems in Russia found that geomagnetic activity showed three seasonal peaks each of those years (March to May, in July, and in October). Every peak matched an increased incidence of anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and suicide in the city Kirovsk.

One explanation for the correlation is that solar storms desynchronize our circadian rhythm (biological clock). The pineal gland in our brain is affected by the electromagnetic activity
. more at the article http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...es-our-psyche/

There is more about solar flares in the disaster app thread which was moved to the members only area - sigh. The links I posted there are really worth looking at. Mimsey
 
Last edited:

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
I would guess the electromagnetic interference with the human field caused by an emeter is negligible compared to the other sources in the toxic EMF soup any big city dweller lives in.

Paul
 

Gib

Crusader
I would guess the electromagnetic interference with the human field caused by an emeter is negligible compared to the other sources in the toxic EMF soup any big city dweller lives in.

Paul

The very first emeters didn't have ferrite toroids to block EMI. Nor did Volney emeter and Mark 5.

Mark 7 has toroids but after hubbard died.

But, the point I'm making is that Hubbard based his emeter reads in the 1950's and St Hill Special Briefing Course, 1960's, and so called "knowledge" or observation without thinking with EMI, LOL, it wasn't really known at the time.

Back in the day when hubbard was using the Volney Emeter, why one could have voltage spikes or EMI from household appliaces which would effect an instrument such as the emeter, and Hubbard thought these emeter reads, were true, unbeknownst to hisself that EMI exists.

Anyways, Hubbards tech of emeter reads is out there in la la land and based on not really controlled science.

" Conversely, if there are other sources of EMI, such as household appliances, the bead prevents the cable from acting as an antenna and receiving interference from these other devices. This is particularly common on data cables and on medical equipment"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_core
 
snip.

" Conversely, if there are other sources of EMI, such as household appliances, the bead prevents the cable from acting as an antenna and receiving interference from these other devices. This is particularly common on data cables and on medical equipment"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_core
I don't know WTF a ferrite toroids is though it sound awfully sexy in a slurred drunken way - they had a ferrite toroid affair on the patio then the wife thowed up and fired the baby thitter.

That, ahem, aside - I don't know how much a Mk 7 Quantum is protected from interference - I have gotten needle movement from what I guess was static electricity in the OT 6/7 meter/practical room at the sand castle. It was winter when static is more prone to happen, and when I would put my hand near the meter, the needle would move.

What is the bead you mention BTW?

Mimsey
 

Gib

Crusader
I don't know WTF a ferrite toroids is though it sound awfully sexy in a slurred drunken way - they had a ferrite toroid affair on the patio then the wife thowed up and fired the baby thitter.

That, ahem, aside - I don't know how much a Mk 7 Quantum is protected from interference - I have gotten needle movement from what I guess was static electricity in the OT 6/7 meter/practical room at the sand castle. It was winter when static is more prone to happen, and when I would put my hand near the meter, the needle would move.

What is the bead you mention BTW?

Mimsey

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_bead
 

RogerB

Crusader
Roger's info on this is that, the meter passes a simple continuous direct current through the body . . . it is micro amps as to level and, as such, causes no problems.

If the current used was AC . . . now you'd be exposed to something that could damage various sensitive bodily parts or dentistry . . . to be noted is the fact that radio waves are generated by acceleration of electrons . . . and that is exactly what is occurring with AC as/when the current flux is alternating/reversing.

Solar flare radiation and cosmic particle radiation is a different but similar beast in that it often contains highly charged particles that can, both knock about the molecular structures of DNA and bodily cells and also as Paul points our, can have an affect on the human energy field/aura . . . this just as getting near a magnetic force can and as is known to occur when hit by certain high frequency RF.

I am answering this thread in detail because, coincidentally, the article linked below hit my email inbox this morning:biggrin:

Wi-fi devices increase mercury release from dental amalgams

Recent research indicates that our increasingly Wi-Fi saturated environment could be greatly amplifying the dangers of mercury exposure from dental amalgams.


A new study published in the Journal of Neuroimmunology, entitled, “Effect of radiofrequency radiation from Wi-Fi devices on mercury release from amalgam restorations”, reveals that our now ubiquitous exposure to Wi-Fi radiation may be amplifying the toxicity of dental amalgams and other forms of mercury exposure in the human body.


In what appears to be the first study of its kind, Brazilian researchers looked specifically at the potential for Wi-Fi signals to increase the release of mercury from dental amalgams, which are composed of approximately 50% elemental mercury.


The highly controlled method researchers used was to recreate amalgam-filled teeth using standard protocols and then storing them in saline solution at 37° C for 14 days. The 14 day period was chosen because previous research has revealed mercury is released from amalgam restorations at gradually decreasing amounts to a constant level 14 days after the filling. 1Afterwards, and before exposing the teeth to Wi-Fi signals, samples were poured into plastic tubes filled with artificial saliva at a 1.5 cm thickness to mimic soft tissue.

Snipped . . .
(Source: wakeup-world.com; March 4, 2017; http://tinyurl.com/zh2y827)

/
 

DagwoodGum

Squirreling Dervish
The very first emeters didn't have ferrite toroids to block EMI. Nor did Volney emeter and Mark 5.

Mark 7 has toroids but after hubbard died.

But, the point I'm making is that Hubbard based his emeter reads in the 1950's and St Hill Special Briefing Course, 1960's, and so called "knowledge" or observation without thinking with EMI, LOL, it wasn't really known at the time.

Back in the day when hubbard was using the Volney Emeter, why one could have voltage spikes or EMI from household appliaces which would effect an instrument such as the emeter, and Hubbard thought these emeter reads, were true, unbeknownst to hisself that EMI exists.

Anyways, Hubbards tech of emeter reads is out there in la la land and based on not really controlled science.

" Conversely, if there are other sources of EMI, such as household appliances, the bead prevents the cable from acting as an antenna and receiving interference from these other devices. This is particularly common on data cables and on medical equipment"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_core

People here won't hear you when you articlate any causal electromagnetic aspect an emeter possesses for some reason.
All the worse for you if you attempt to enter science into the discussion.
Goes back to protestations over Arnie Lerma's research when it was trashed by the hold over self annointed eletist mentalities as passed down upon his minions by Elron hisself.
Service facsimilies ruffled up by Arnie who innadvertently may have been coming off as more intelligent and thereby violating a superflous entrenched pecking order with its control over a few ducklings lined up in dire homeage to their new found opinion leaders after losing all of their old Scilon ones whom they were conditioned into blind obedience with.
Don't bother as it won't go where you expect it to...
But do open up an emeter and while observing that battery pack ask yourself "where does all that juice go"?
Ask also, "with all of the tens devices, zappers and a myriad of electronic devices designed to stimulate your neurons, why would Elcon choose the one and only device, if there was one to be found, that had no associative neuron stimulating buzz to it"?
Was he too much the straight shooter to fool you?
What about those who are fooling you now into thinking it is not the biggest key to the overall puzzlement of "how could this all have fooled me so"?
THIS IS THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION ''HOW WERE MY NEURONS SO STIMULATED THAT I WAS TRICKED INTO BELEIVING THE TECH WORKED"?
The emeter trickle charged you, and that was the trick.
They even used it on you during word clearing didn't they.
 
Last edited:

JustSheila

Crusader
Last year I bought a cheap instrument for detecting electricity so I could find the hot wires in my house. Unfortunately, the gadget was so sensitive it seemed to go off all the time. It freaked me out; I thought I had cut wires and open electricity all over the ceiling.:omg:

Until I turned off my electronic gadgets (like the big TV) that operated with remotes through WiFi. The gadget was going off on detecting WiFi, wow! I didn't expect that. It was mostly reacting to the television and also a bit to the router, but calmed right down after I shut off my WiFi gadgets. (It didn't react to my smartphone, though. Maybe it wasn't big enough.) The television was new, btw.

If a $10 electrical detection gadget can detect and react to electronic WiFi waves, I would think an emeter could as well. Static electricity was never powerful enough to make the gadget react, but it seems to me it could. The emeter was never designed to eliminate other electrical interference. It is basically a cheap, dodgy gadget in a fancy plastic box. Think about it - what reliable electronic device would have electrodes that are only partially covered (by your hands) and open to the environment where they are uncovered? Not an accurate one. :no:
 

RogerB

Crusader
Yes, another report in my emails this morning . . .

State of Maryland issues report on wifi schools - not favorable

The Maryland Children’s Environmental Health and Protection Advisory Council (CEHPAC) issued an eleven-page report December 13, 2016 titled “Wifi Radiation in Schools in Maryland Final Report,” which every school district in the country, if not around the globe, needs to read and implement.


On page 5 of that report, we find “What exposures are linked to WiFi technology?” Here’s what’s said:
“WiFi radiation” (WiFi), also referred to as radiofrequency radiation (RFR), is non-ionizing radiation typically in the microwave frequencies of approximately 900 megahertz (million cycles/second, or MHz) to approximately 5 gigahertz (1,000 million cycles per second, or GHz).


WiFi is used primarily for cellular telephones, local area networks (LANs), and other communications technologies. The primary bands used for WiFi are generally 2.4 GHz and 5GHz. [CJF: Which is similar to an operating microwave oven’s range of 2.4 GHz or above!]
WiFi radiation exposures are regulated by several agencies. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issues radiation exposure guidelines as specific absorption rates (SARs) for fixed antennas, hand-held cellular telephones, and personal communications services (PCS) devices. 1 These guidelines were last issued by the FCC in 1996. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has established occupational exposure limits for microwave radiation. 2 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not have standards for cellular telephones, but can take regulatory action if these devices are shown to have adverse health impacts. 3


Microwave technology researchers Martha R Herbert, PhD, MD, Harvard Medical School and other affiliations; David O Carpenter, MD, Director, Institute for Health and the Environment, University of Albany; Karolinska Institute associate professor Department of Neuroscience Olle Johannson and other respected independent-of-microwave-technology-funding researchers’ work have been consolidated into a 97-page anthology of sorts regarding EMF and RFR and their physiological effects, which can be read here.


Maryland state, education and children’s welfare officials obviously have come to the conclusion that parents have the right to know if there is an environmental hazard in the classrooms their children occupy for up to six hours a day. Currently, 20 countries around the world have taken steps to protect children from EMF and RFR microwave radiation in the form of WiFi technology in classrooms.


The upshot of the above CEHPAC report, parental and community involvement is the Report’s recommending the Maryland Department of Education (DoE) recommend to local school districts to reduce classroom wireless radiation exposures by switching over to and providing WIRED Internet connections.

Snipped . . .
/
 

Gizmo

Rabble Rouser
I would guess the electromagnetic interference with the human field caused by an emeter is negligible compared to the other sources in the toxic EMF soup any big city dweller lives in.

Paul

True.

However, I'd not go so far as to say the use of an emeter - particularly what it is used for - is harmless.

But, I'd go so far as to say the practice of scientology is more harmful than helpful.

Yet the overall claimed results produced by scientology has yet to be in evidence.

Overall, isn't the emeter - in their own terms - a red herring ?
 

Gib

Crusader
Last year I bought a cheap instrument for detecting electricity so I could find the hot wires in my house. Unfortunately, the gadget was so sensitive it seemed to go off all the time. It freaked me out; I thought I had cut wires and open electricity all over the ceiling.:omg:

Until I turned off my electronic gadgets (like the big TV) that operated with remotes through WiFi. The gadget was going off on detecting WiFi, wow! I didn't expect that. It was mostly reacting to the television and also a bit to the router, but calmed right down after I shut off my WiFi gadgets. (It didn't react to my smartphone, though. Maybe it wasn't big enough.) The television was new, btw.

If a $10 electrical detection gadget can detect and react to electronic WiFi waves, I would think an emeter could as well. Static electricity was never powerful enough to make the gadget react, but it seems to me it could. The emeter was never designed to eliminate other electrical interference. It is basically a cheap, dodgy gadget in a fancy plastic box. Think about it - what reliable electronic device would have electrodes that are only partially covered (by your hands) and open to the environment where they are uncovered? Not an accurate one. :no:

exactly, Hubbards original testing of the emeter did not have cable shielding on the wires going from the cans to the emeter. Toroids prevent wires and cans and a human as acting like an antenna to pick up RF signals and higher. Hubbards testing is done in an uncontrolled environment.

CB radios, TV cable, all use coaxial cable shielding. The center terminal is the signal, and the shielding is the ground connection, some more expensive cables have an additional aluminum shield in the cable to prevent unwanted signals entering in to distort. There is also the matter of the dialectic used to separate the center terminal from the outside ground shielding.

coax-x-section.gif


The emeter and cans use only wires and no shielding, nor is there positive or negative. Just thinking out loud, the proper way to test the emeter would be to have a testing done in a closed environment, like a large box that has been magnetically shielded from any outside influence.

FYI, old instuments of high standards had their electronics in a box lined with copper, these are precision instruments.

Cable 101:

https://www.belden.com/docs/upload/Insulations-Jackets.pdf
 
Last edited:

Gib

Crusader
I don't know WTF a ferrite toroids is though it sound awfully sexy in a slurred drunken way - they had a ferrite toroid affair on the patio then the wife thowed up and fired the baby thitter.

That, ahem, aside - I don't know how much a Mk 7 Quantum is protected from interference - I have gotten needle movement from what I guess was static electricity in the OT 6/7 meter/practical room at the sand castle. It was winter when static is more prone to happen, and when I would put my hand near the meter, the needle would move.

What is the bead you mention BTW?

Mimsey

I replied to you Mims, do you understand now?
 
I have to gird my loins and go read your post. :hide: Mimsey
Ok. I didn't die. I was a feared you would spring some electrical whoopdedoo on me and I would pass out from the M/U's, lack of mass and trashed gradients (one must apply the proper terminology, after all, this is the lingua franca of the denizens of ESMB)

However, you acquitted yourself handsomely, and I thusly thank you.

:yes:

Mimsey
 

DagwoodGum

Squirreling Dervish
exactly, Hubbards original testing of the emeter did not have cable shielding on the wires going from the cans to the emeter. Toroids prevent wires and cans and a human as acting like an antenna to pick up RF signals and higher. Hubbards testing is done in an uncontrolled environment.

CB radios, TV cable, all use coaxial cable shielding. The center terminal is the signal, and the shielding is the ground connection, some more expensive cables have an additional aluminum shield in the cable to prevent unwanted signals entering in to distort. There is also the matter of the dialectic used to separate the center terminal from the outside ground shielding.

coax-x-section.gif


The emeter and cans use only wires and no shielding, nor is there positive or negative. Just thinking out loud, the proper way to test the emeter would be to have a testing done in a closed environment, like a large box that has been magnetically shielded from any outside influence.

FYI, old instuments of high standards had their electronics in a box lined with copper, these are precision instruments.

Cable 101:

https://www.belden.com/docs/upload/Insulations-Jackets.pdf


Cut to images of Elcon testing the early device on tomato plants.
It wasn't about codifying reads as there would not be any as you're dealing with an entirely different class of life form.
What you are seeing, however, is evidence of emphasis on quantifying the electromagnetic stimulation of the energy field of another life form.
Now cut to the device being attached to your physical form...
Bingo!
More electromagnetic stimulation.
Herein lies the source of the buzz you've received while being hooked up to the device and it not being the "tech".
The answer was right in front of our faces in the early photos.
Right in front of our faces - the best place to hide something!
 
Last edited:

dchoiceisalwaysrs

Gold Meritorious Patron
exactly, Hubbards original testing of the emeter did not have cable shielding on the wires going from the cans to the emeter. Toroids prevent wires and cans and a human as acting like an antenna to pick up RF signals and higher. Hubbards testing is done in an uncontrolled environment.

CB radios, TV cable, all use coaxial cable shielding. The center terminal is the signal, and the shielding is the ground connection, some more expensive cables have an additional aluminum shield in the cable to prevent unwanted signals entering in to distort. There is also the matter of the dialectic used to separate the center terminal from the outside ground shielding.

coax-x-section.gif


The emeter and cans use only wires and no shielding, nor is there positive or negative. Just thinking out loud, the proper way to test the emeter would be to have a testing done in a closed environment, like a large box that has been magnetically shielded from any outside influence.

FYI, old instuments of high standards had their electronics in a box lined with copper, these are precision instruments.

Cable 101:

https://www.belden.com/docs/upload/Insulations-Jackets.pdf

This is of course an example of fairly stable and relatively pure conductors in a physically again stable state. Sure that is not absolutely true but compare it to the electrical And Chemical activities of human nerves with potentially highly variable of many of the factors mentioned in the educational link.

Then what about the milieu of the muscles and other tissues surrounding the nerves? Aren't they also frequently changing in oxygen and a myriad of other biocompounds. And of course the solo cans on only one side of the body vs the longer circuit from two different sides of the body.
I saw a couple of Paul's meter reads demonstrations on YouTube, interesting! They iirc seem to point away from the sweat theory but don't address the internal states of the ' hand electrodes.
But most of what I have written also doesn't really home in on Mimseys question of solar activities affecting the nerves in the brain.
We might direct some attention to EEG and fMRI amongst other similar technologies to gather info on frequencies, magnitudes of farad's, voltages, capacitances and currents as well as antenna value of said nerves.

What did El Con prevaricate about all this?

Wait a minute,,, or two I see no need to step back inside the closed universe, and shrinking, bubble of scn.
 

Gizmo

Rabble Rouser
So, in essence, the emeter is an even bigger hoax than anyone - except hubbie - every imagined !

Once again, I get to find out I was even more duped than I had ever imagined.

The onion of scientology seemingly is going to peel forever.
 

DagwoodGum

Squirreling Dervish
So, in essence, the emeter is an even bigger hoax than anyone - except hubbie - every imagined !

Once again, I get to find out I was even more duped than I had ever imagined.

The onion of scientology seemingly is going to peel forever.

Same here.
But don't feel bad as he was such a slight of hand expert that his parrots still whistle dixie about what "insignificant currants" it uses, like they would know when you can't even coax them into dissasembling one to see what's inside.
Like it would be sacreligious to even think the thought about, or "squirreling" to fool with one.
It really seems to take 3x as long to truely get entirely out as it took to get fully indoctrinated, that rule of 3 again that seems to keep cropping up.
 
Last edited:

Gib

Crusader
So, in essence, the emeter is an even bigger hoax than anyone - except hubbie - every imagined !

Once again, I get to find out I was even more duped than I had ever imagined.

The onion of scientology seemingly is going to peel forever.

Here's what is amazing too, Gizmo. Bob Duggan, a whale for scientology, has donated 360 million to scientology. And yet the guy has now just recently invested in a stock ticker symbol PLSE which recently made the headlines. There is another tread here on ESMB about it.

So, we have one of the richest man in world investing in a stock, and also investing (donating) in scientology. Go figure, what is the difference, well PLSE uses science and scientology uses rhetoric and marketing and propaganda. How on earth Bob Duggan doesn't see this is not know by me.

I mean I just today listened to the PLSE website videos of their break thru science with NPS. Looks promising and real science and not Hubbard's PDC's lectures of bullshit and all sounding scientific with his lectures of theta having wavelengths of .00000001. Maybe Bob Duggan never listened to Hubbard's ultimate bullshit OT PDC's?

Here they are: http://www.pulsebiosciences.com/pulse-biosciences-videos/

It would be interesting to see and hear the employed Doctors and PHD's people involved in PLSE, what they think of Hubbard's PDC's and Scientology religion, could they examine the Emeter and analyze the results?

And, of course, Hubbard claimed his Bridge to Total Freedom would handle cancer via engram running of chains. LOL
 
Last edited:

Gib

Crusader
Here's what is amazing too, Gizmo. Bob Duggan, a whale for scientology, has donated 360 million to scientology. And yet the guy has now just recently invested in a stock ticker symbol PLSE which recently made the headlines. There is another tread here on ESMB about it.

So, we have one of the richest man in world investing in a stock, and also investing (donating) in scientology. Go figure, what is the difference, well PLSE uses science and scientology uses rhetoric and marketing and propaganda. How on earth Bob Duggan doesn't see this is not know by me.

I mean I just today listened to the PLSE website videos of their break thru science with NPS. Looks promising and real science and not Hubbard's PDC's lectures of bullshit and all sounding scientific with his lectures of theta having wavelengths of .00000001. Maybe Bob Duggan never listened to Hubbard's ultimate OT PDC's?

Here they are: http://www.pulsebiosciences.com/pulse-biosciences-videos/

It would be interesting to see and hear the employed Doctors and PHD's people involved in PLSE, what they think of Hubbard's PDC's and Scientology religion, could they examine the Emeter and analyze the results?

And, of course, Hubbard claimed his Bridge to Total Freedom would handle cancer via engram running of chains. LOL

Here is the rhetoric of scientology supposedly were science and religion meet:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXf3pWVJOkA

Don't ask me why Robert Duggan falls for this rhetoric. :confused2:
 
Top