I don't get it - the OP was about the guest, not the interviewer, yet for some reason that seems to be lost in the above comments. Bitching about Joe and not the content Eric is presenting.
Did everybody fail miserably on Op Pro by Dup? Flunked the obnosis drill? Can't do the duplication drill - "1, 2, 3, What did I say?"
If this were a BS subject, why then does this particular pod cast have 2,049,147 views?
Sigh.
I guess it's me. When I was studying Scientology - I loved the axioms, the four conditions, the factors, logics, pre logics, the concept of co-existence as theta, all of his mumbo jumbo in the nature and structure of the universe. That made a world more sense than the Christian theology of heaven and hell, the all powerful God allowing his son to be crucified - the vengeful god of the old testament toasting whole cities. Where was his vengeance when his son died? Crickets.
I wrongly assumed, or so it seems, that others had the same or similar interests, and they would continue to have them post Scientology. That those others lived on ESMB. I'm certain some do, perhaps many do, but gosh.
Where is the urge to learn something new? I post these things to present other concepts, and yes, some are hair brained, but some, like the above are not. Well, I tried.
Oh well.
Mimsey