For the record

[Panda Termint]

Good discussion. Nice to see.

 

[Claire Swazey]

Her point was not that Scientology is as bad as the others.

Her point is that Scientology has a double standard with regards to evidence.

The Anabaptist Jacques

Well, yanno, if you're gonna do the Opinion Leader thang...sorry, but I don't care what a cyberstranger thinks about Scn. And Mark Baker's right in his point about tarring all with the same broad brush of CofSness. (my wording, not his)

 

[Claire Swazey]

You could just as easily have answered the questions here, but I guess you'd rather not.

Dude, I think he's saying he already addressed it.

 

[Smilla]

Something that seems to be absent in all flavours of Scientology is Evidence-based Critical Thinking.

That's probably the main reason why very few people take it seriously.

 

[Claire Swazey]

In this case, I'm inclined to take it more as Geir's describing his personal journey. Personal journeys are a bit different, IMO.