What's new

FROM BLOWNFORGOOD - HOW TO GET FAMILY OUT OF INT

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
I hope noone minds me going back to the main theme of this thread.
I want to say that this is some amazing information. Not only is it revealing, it is vital that this infornation be made available to as many as can possibly view it.

The thread was discussing the oppression at the top most level of the church, and situations that indicate that there are likely to exist severe violations of basic human rights. There are so many questions that need to be asked about this situation.

By the way, my name was on that list that MarkWI posted. So are some of my friends. It is the list of individuals considered FAIR GAME by the Church Of Scientology. It is the list that is a roster of the people that could not take the oppression and left. (as Ozzie said from the 90s) It is the list of people that were to be considered FAIR GAME. In other words if they were to ever decide to speak out against the church......retaliation would be justified. In other words..."shut up or you will pay for it."

God knows it kept me quiet for 20 years.

Before I go too much furher I know that several amoung us give a hats off to Chuck Beatty. He is one person amoung us that is brave enough to stand up to them.

Some of the things I am reading here and on BFGs earlier threads makes me sick. Mostly because having been in the SO, and because many of my memories of similar kinds of oppression have been....well oppressed. I chose to forget them, and so have.

Many of us have our own experiences, and to many of us that have been in the SO, (if you heed the posts) this is the real stuff. THIS IS REAL. Whether you understand how a person could allow themselves to become part of such a thing or not, it is still real.

Thank Emma for this message board. We can have dialog and try to help each other understand.

I understand that SO members are victims of brain-washing. Brain-washing Set in, layer upon layer, upon layer, year after year after year. Set in by the nature of the system, and the tech.

Part of the brain-washing is the environment of total dependancy. SO members are dependent upon the organization for all needs. Many have children and spouses in the mix.... Some may not stand up against it because they feel they have too much to loose.

Part of the situation is that many of these individuals now suffering are guilty of the same crimes DM is guilty of. Many of then were no doubt proud to have been so close to the top....Many have oppressed others. They know well the consequences of going against DM, because they have been party to it themselves.

Part of the situations is a problem that seems to have no resolution, but to give in. What do you do? Your entire family...your children are in another building, or in another city being taken care of by someone else. Your husband or wife is also in the organization....they may not feel the way you do. Do you want to also give up your marriage? Your children? All your friends? If you did leave, or could leave...where would you go. You have no experience on the outside....nowhere to go, noone to turn to. "This is all I know..."

There have been so many incredible postings here. It hurts my heart to read what I am reading.

But the word is getting out. Something can be done. A solution will be attained someday. But when? Big questions abound. People need to keep discussing it, without bullshit distractions designed to take our attention off of it.

I for one, wonder why our government tolerates the SO. What is going on in the SO makes WACO look like a true heaven on Earth. Yet, our government did not tolerate WACo. The government looses millions in taxes. They have no doublt heard horror stories. Why does it tolorate the SO? Who benefits?

Imagine what they could find in a raid?

There, I rambled...sorry

Love to all,
Duddins

Good point, Dudins.

The sole founding purpose of the US federal government was to protect peoples' rights. I think we have lost sight of that in the last few years.

And so groups like the Church of Scientology are just fine.

Excellent post.

I'm glad you are here. :)
 

Krysti

Patron with Honors
Krysti,

This posting at #49 by some anonymous person called 'BTs2Free', and posted here by another anonymous person called 'Lulu Belle' is not evidence. Any half-decent German intelligence officer could write this up in an afternoon between mugs of Warsteiner.



Eamonn

So, which is it? You don't believe people are being held against their will or you think they are being held against their will to make them "tough as nails"?

Also, you still didn't answer my original question.
 

Voltaire's Child

Fool on the Hill
Eamonn,

I know Chuck Beatty. I've met him. And I know others who've described very similar things.

Ever hear the term "universal truth"?
 

Voltaire's Child

Fool on the Hill
Krysti,

I think Eamonn is making the point that CofS doesn't do that stuff and when they do, it's ok, because somehow the people deserved it.

So they don't do it, but they do and it's ok!!

:coolwink:
 

Krysti

Patron with Honors
Krysti,

I think Eamonn is making the point that CofS doesn't do that stuff and when they do, it's ok, because somehow the people deserved it.

So they don't do it, but they do and it's ok!!

:coolwink:

Hi Fluff,

I just wanted to see if he'd be okay with it if someone did that to him for the "greater good..."

I don't really expect to get an answer, but hopefully he'll at least think about it. It's easy to say whatever you want when it's happening to someone else, but if you can put yourself in the person's shoes...

Krysti
 

Krysti

Patron with Honors
And I don't buy the whole "evidence" bit either. Just a diversion tactic. Anyone who is on the internet knows what's going on in the CofS. They might want to turn a blind-eye to it or think it's justified for whatever nonsensical reason, but to talk about "evidence" is just nonsense.

Krysti
 

alex

Gold Meritorious Patron
And I don't buy the whole "evidence" bit either. Just a diversion tactic. Anyone who is on the internet knows what's going on in the CofS. They might want to turn a blind-eye to it or think it's justified for whatever nonsensical reason, but to talk about "evidence" is just nonsense.

Krysti

Yes of course any kind of proof would just get in the way of what we all know already.
:)

alex
 

Krysti

Patron with Honors
Are you all sure that the tough treatment of the Sea Org doesn't do people any good?

Are you sure that you are all not being a little overly sympathetic?

Are you sure that the firm approach of the Sea Org does not result in toughening folk up---making men out of mice, and the like?

Are you sure that you don't want the Sea Org to be turned into a pansy's paradise run by a bunch of limp-wristed fluffcakes?


Surely with the Sea Org having the job to do that they have, you can see that they need folks in it that are as hard as nails, for gawd sake!



Eamonn

What was this post in response to, Eamonn?

Someone posted about being held against their will and then you posted the above.

First, it seemed you were saying it is justified to hold people against their will to make them "tough", make "men out of mice", make sure the Sea Org isn't turned into a "pansy's paradise run by a bunch of limp-wristed fluffcakes", make folks "hard as nails".

Then, when asked if you would think it was okay if it happened to you, you wanted to know where the evidence was?

Which is it? Do you believe it is justified that people are held against their will or do you believe it doesn't happen?
 

Voltaire's Child

Fool on the Hill
Hi Fluff,

I just wanted to see if he'd be okay with it if someone did that to him for the "greater good..."

I don't really expect to get an answer, but hopefully he'll at least think about it. It's easy to say whatever you want when it's happening to someone else, but if you can put yourself in the person's shoes...

Krysti

Yes, I know you were making that point.

And it's a good one!
 

Mick Wenlock

Admin Emeritus (retired)
This Chuck Beatty?
(referred to in url link below)







Eamonn

Hmm.

You are whining about "free speech" I noticed. So I thought I might address that very point.

You claim that you are being put upon by having your links pulled. Yet you don't show that the site you are linking to supports freedom of speech. That site (RFW) does not contain links to its opponents sites, so why are you linking to it if you are such a proponent of Free Speech?

Or is it the case that you are trying to cloak yourself in a virtuous pose of supporting freedom of speech when, in fact, you support the Church of Scientology's vicious and hate filled campaign against that very principle?

It is funny to watch, you - the Church of Scientology and it's leprous supporters - are so divorced from reality that you fail to realize that most people can see through your attempts to try and disguise what you are truly about.

It is obvious that you support the wholesale ad hominem attacks that are the only content of the website you link to. That would mean that you do not care to engage in discussion but merely wish to try and shut people up.

You, sir, are a tosspot and a wanker. I am kind of surprised that your presence in Australia does not cause the entire continent to heave in revulsion in an attempt to expel the carrion that you represent.

You support people who are repugnant in the extreme.

FOAD, toad.
 

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
Hmm.

You are whining about "free speech" I noticed. So I thought I might address that very point.

You claim that you are being put upon by having your links pulled. Yet you don't show that the site you are linking to supports freedom of speech. That site (RFW) does not contain links to its opponents sites, so why are you linking to it if you are such a proponent of Free Speech?

Or is it the case that you are trying to cloak yourself in a virtuous pose of supporting freedom of speech when, in fact, you support the Church of Scientology's vicious and hate filled campaign against that very principle?

It is funny to watch, you - the Church of Scientology and it's leprous supporters - are so divorced from reality that you fail to realize that most people can see through your attempts to try and disguise what you are truly about.

It is obvious that you support the wholesale ad hominem attacks that are the only content of the website you link to. That would mean that you do not care to engage in discussion but merely wish to try and shut people up.

You, sir, are a tosspot and a wanker. I am kind of surprised that your presence in Australia does not cause the entire continent to heave in revulsion in an attempt to expel the carrion that you represent.

You support people who are repugnant in the extreme.

FOAD, toad.

Well!

Thank you , Mick.

While Mick goes off to powder his nose, I'd just like to add to you, Eamonn, that I respect your right to speak freely here. But, as you now, freedom comes with responsibility.

So until you handle your own Church and its criminal disregard for the rights of its members, you, as a member of the Church of Scientology, will not have the right to full and complete freedom of speech.

So why are you so criminally irresponsible for your own right to the freedom of speech?

Do you think that you may have pulled it in?
 

alex

Gold Meritorious Patron
Funny, Alex.

Evidence is evidence.

But only proof is proof.

Would you say that evidence exists that people are being held against their will?

Or are you just playing "The Devil's Advocate"?

I would first want some proof.
:)

alex (transparent mode)(I havent been following the thread, just replied to a comment)
 

alex

Gold Meritorious Patron
Funny, Alex.

Evidence is evidence.

But only proof is proof.

Would you say that evidence exists that people are being held against their will?

Or are you just playing "The Devil's Advocate"?

I would say that people are being held....with their will.

If you get that whole gestalt.

alex
 

Krysti

Patron with Honors
I would say that people are being held....with their will.

If you get that whole gestalt.

alex


If someone kidnapped you and told you if you tried to leave they would kill your family, would you consider you were being held against your will - or with your will?
 

Zinjifar

Silver Meritorious Sponsor
I would say that people are being held....with their will.

If you get that whole gestalt.

alex

I would agree that many are being held using their *damaged* will. But, there are almost certainly any number being held against their will, although, a percentage of those will not have expressed that will, due to very real fear of retaliation.

Zinj
 
Top