Gib
Crusader
Re: Garcias back in court in fraud lawsuit after Scientology makes arbitration imposs
I know this is subtle, and meant to be by Hubbard and DM/COS/Lawyers.
follow policy?
If you ask me that is brainwashing, or creating Ronbots. LOL (hey, at OT8 you get to find out who you are not, and the next level you get find out who you are, or some such carrot on a stick BS, LOL)
No independent thoughts allowed, just follow policy or "what would Ron do". LOL
But, anyways, didn't the lawyer on Leah Remini latest episode state that the way he won lawsuits was to separate religion from 1st Amendment rights or something like that.
This latest rhetorical appeal by Wally Pope is trying to get religion involved whereas the lawsuit is about fraud of money and not religious beliefs.
I hope the Judge sees thru this, for rhetoric is not to be considered in a court case.
http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4424&context=uclrev
I do believe this fellow has figured it out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvMoSsuRVW8
Latest update.
In short, scientology want to send out a letter to possible candidates from MIKE ELLIS (IJC) asking them if they would participate.
OMFG.
I suppose the idea that it comes from him is supposed to stop people immediately ringing OSA (which of course they will) so they don't get into legal trouble though IMO there is no way they wouldn't be 'briefed' anyway, no way. "Meet me at this street at midnight and I'll brief you". Oh yes, that happens. This is so totally crazy I can imagine the frenzy it is creating to try and find a way to "handle" this terrible emergency. The bolded sentence below is telling them what to say per policy! The letter is giving scientologists protection from their own organisation's other policies!! I really hope the Judge understands the complexities of this. Also the fact that NO scientologist "in good standing" is EVER going to do anything other than what they are told and expected to do - follow policy.
From the motion:
To see the proposed letter: http://tonyortega.org/2017/06/03/sc...ge-calling-our-members-directly-are-you-nuts/
I know this is subtle, and meant to be by Hubbard and DM/COS/Lawyers.
follow policy?
If you ask me that is brainwashing, or creating Ronbots. LOL (hey, at OT8 you get to find out who you are not, and the next level you get find out who you are, or some such carrot on a stick BS, LOL)
No independent thoughts allowed, just follow policy or "what would Ron do". LOL
But, anyways, didn't the lawyer on Leah Remini latest episode state that the way he won lawsuits was to separate religion from 1st Amendment rights or something like that.
This latest rhetorical appeal by Wally Pope is trying to get religion involved whereas the lawsuit is about fraud of money and not religious beliefs.
I hope the Judge sees thru this, for rhetoric is not to be considered in a court case.
http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4424&context=uclrev
I do believe this fellow has figured it out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvMoSsuRVW8
Last edited: