Panda Termint
Cabal Of One
Just the appropriate amount above "Victim"... you'll thank me for it later."No Sympathy"
Where is THAT on the Tone Scale, DAD!
Just the appropriate amount above "Victim"... you'll thank me for it later."No Sympathy"
Where is THAT on the Tone Scale, DAD!
Alonzo; You are trolling on the forum. Yeah, and you know it. I do understand that you want the attention - but you need to chill down.
May I suggest that Alanzo calls Isene Isone?Alonzo; You are trolling on the forum. Yeah, and you know it. I do understand that you want the attention - but you need to chill down.

I lurked some on Giers board to see what it looked like, man, Alonzo, you got some heavy duty plumbing ahead of you for sure.
But I can understand the problem the people there express, they don´t like coming to a board to be ridiculed. Hopefully we will see a surge of people going to that board to read their opinions, because they won´t come here.
I lurked some on Giers board to see what it looked like, man, Alonzo, you got some heavy duty plumbing ahead of you for sure.
But I can understand the problem the people there express, they don´t like coming to a board to be ridiculed. Hopefully we will see a surge of people going to that board to read their opinions, because they won´t come here.
Be careful wot you read. Can make you sick.

When I posted on scnforum.org that LRH didn't have a "particularly good track record of telling the truth", Geir said that was an ad hom of LRH! So I referenced Bare Faced Messiah for evidence and proof of his track record as regards telling the truth and I questioned if criticism of scn and LRH is not allowed. That reply hasn't been approved by the moderators yet.
I believe Geir is well intentioned, but freedom of speech is a hard concept for a scientologist to put into practice. I wish him well.
I tried to be "lionheart" on his forum, but my log-in kept getting booted off. Geir has been trying to sort it out and I registered under his suggestion as another ID "Earthling" but that ID also gets booted out repeatedly making it almost impossible to post.
Geir is trying to sort it out, which I very much appreciate.
Geir himself, have labeled me a "troll".
I think my lifetime is limited on that board.
One moderator has already called me "low-toned", and others, including Geir himself, have labeled me a "troll". I have had to defend myself against AdHom attacks, and report AdHom attacks in posts which have gotten by the moderators, even though one of their jobs is to supposedly police ad hom attacks in posts and not let them onto the board. Many people have complained about my posts there, which is continuing to annoy the other moderators and cause them more and more "dev-T".
These are the storm clouds gathering on my horizon at the Scientology Forum.
They want a "pro-Scientology" board.
And yet they also want "the freedom of speech".
Such is the touching naivete of ideologues. It's like neo-conservatives saying "We will be greeted as liberators", or communists saying "the state will eventually whither away". An ideologue never realizes that his ideology can not withstand reality. When he finally does realize this, he's no longer an ideologue.
Oh well.
Such is life, and our own paths to enlightenment.
When I posted on scnforum.org that LRH didn't have a "particularly good track record of telling the truth", Geir said that was an ad hom of LRH!
I tried to be "lionheart" on his forum, but my log-in kept getting booted off. Geir has been trying to sort it out and I registered under his suggestion as another ID "Earthling" but that ID also gets booted out repeatedly making it almost impossible to post.
Geir is trying to sort it out, which I very much appreciate.
It was adHom - and I would protect you the same - if anyone started question your "track of truth" to discredit you.
It was adHom - and I would protect you the same - if anyone started question your "track of truth" to discredit you.
As I mailed you, FUDforum seems incapable of producing the behavior that you report except if there is some bug in the software. We'll figure out some solution to this, as I do want you to post.
As for freedom of speech etc,; yes as long as the rules are adhered to (so far it's been damn difficult to keep up with traffic and the number of reported posts).
That's an odd use of Ad hominem on a forum, since, as far as I know, Ron isn't a member there, doesn't post there and is, in fact *dead*Not to mention that saying that Ron had a less than stellar track record of 'truth telling' is being *kind*.I think that you (and others) should also look a little more deeply into what Ad Hominem means too. As it happens, an 'ad hominem fallacy' isn't even really a fallacy per se, although it tends to get lumped in with them. But, there are completely legitimate uses for disputing both the authority or truthfulness of a debater or witness, because, when someone is claiming something on his own experience or authority or testimony, whether he's an *honest* reporter is a crucial element.And, the facts speak for themselves; Ron had a long history of claiming experience and qualification that He did *not* have. Which brings into question every bit of his testimony that's based on those qualifications or claimed experience.Is it your contention that anyone making any claim must be taken at face value regardless of the blatant falsity of his claims?Will you apply your 'AdHom' protection to someone who claims to have seen L. Ron Hubbard felating goats in mexico?Zinj
Poor old David Misc. He's being Ad hom-ed to hell and back. Geir. Do you have the courage to look at evidence that people have ("Bare faced Messiah"), that Ron Hubbard did actually lie about things, including very very important things.?