I think people who are vulnerable get attracted to Scientology as it claims to have all the answers.I honestly believe that had it not been for my exposure to scio that I would have been dead from suicide long ago. For all that is bad in scn, it taught me to be resilient and so I can still raise a fog on a glass.
I think people who are vulnerable get attracted to Scientology as it claims to have all the answers.
So it may well be that there are some who decide to put their life in the hands of a cult instead of taking it. Looks to me that both decisions are not the best possible outcome.![]()
I think people who are vulnerable get attracted to Scientology as it claims to have all the answers.
So it may well be that there are some who decide to put their life in the hands of a cult instead of taking it. Looks to me that both decisions are not the best possible outcome.![]()
I got to come to know some really wonderful people in spite of the fact we were deeply under the influence of a nasty little cult called scn.
Randomly chosen, here's a good experience in Scientology:
<snip>
He responded with eyes closed but a slight Monty Python-esque smirk, "One good fuck."
<snip> "Move through the incident to a point one good fuck later."
<snip>
It doesn't sound like much, but it was a very interesting experience.
<snip>.
These are experiences that - in and of themselves - were positive.
![]()
Please stay on the very limited topic.
If no one has anything positive to add on the subject, that's fine. It will be an empty thread, and that's OK.
Randomly chosen, here's a good experience in Scientology:
Having worked at a summer job, at the seashore, to get the money to buy the Scientology training levels, from Student Hat through the Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course through the five Lower levels, I had just completed the Student Hat, and was now at one of many tables in the enormous Academy room of the New York Org at the Martinique Hotel.
I was on the HSDC theory part and approaching completion. The course Supervisor came over and informed me that the person who was my twin was going to also be my PreClear, when it came time to audit.
My twin was a very tall Monty Python-esque/John Cleese sort of character, and we had often eaten lunch together at the nearby Automat, occasionally serenaded by a white-coated elderly fellow whose job it was to push a small tray around, picking up empty glasses and plates. The old fellow sang in perfect pitch while performing an assortment of operas.
![]()
It seemed like almost everything we did was comedic or ironic, and my twin could simply raise an eyebrow and I would find it funny. It was enjoyable.
But now I was going to audit someone who could make me laugh, pretty much at will?
This I did not eagerly anticipate.
Nonetheless, we continued, and then the day came when I took my PC into session for the first time. Everything went well, and this continued for several days, session after session, until one day when he said something which - at the time, and with a particular expression on his face - seemed, to me, to be incredibly hilarious.
There we were, sitting at a table, in an auditing room, with an e-meter between us and, as my PC, he was "way down the track" following a Dianetic (R3R) chain of incidents.
I ask him, "What is the duration of the incident?"
He responded with eyes closed but a slight Monty Python-esque smirk, "One good fuck."
At that point something extraordinary happened. Every cell in my body wanted to laugh - and I mean laugh hysterically - but I stepped outside myself and took control and calmly, and effortlessly, said, "Move through the incident to a point one good fuck later."
And the session continued to successful completion, and I soon graduated to continue my Scientology adventure.
It doesn't sound like much, but it was a very interesting experience.
There were lots of little experiences like that and it added to the mix that motivated me to continue.
Amusing story. Nice picture. I think your memory (or mine) is a little off on the wording of that R3R command, though.
As I remember it, when I learned to run R3R on the HSDC in 1975, we did not repeat the duration when telling the pc to move through the incident. We said "Move through to the end of the incident." The version of the command you mention, "Move through the incident to a point (duration) later" belongs on the NED course, which came out a few years later. I remember this because I thought it was an annoying and unnecessary addition, like much of the rest of NED.
To try to stay on topic, though: I believe doing TR's 0-4 (almost every day for 6 1/2 years) actually DID improve my ability to communicate, and this resulted in greatly increased self-confidence. This is a benefit which continued after I left scn, and if I had to put it in just a few words I'd say that's the main thing scn did for me.