5th Invader Force
Patron
I'm sure DM does follow some of LRH's policies but not all of them, and I would go so far as to say, not even most of them.
That's why the COS is in trouble.
Here's just a few examples.
He's altering LRH's writings, which is certainly not following policy and is something he definitely not supposed to do. As a matter of fact, I believe doing so is a "high crime" as far as LRH was concerned.
Doing something like that is totally off policy.
LRH came out with St. Hill sized Orgs idea, DM has abandoned that policy from LRH.
What's this Golden Era of Tech? It's nothing but alterations.
Did you ever hear LRH speak of "Golden Era of Tech" in his writings or lectures?
Following the tech? Are you kidding, he's altering it.
LRH policy is to run the church on stats, people and delivery, DM is running it entirely differently. Like with IAS donations with no exchange.
I think someone on the Internet did a complete side by side comparison of how DM is running things and how LRH ran things and they are very different.
There was one person who definitely did follow LRH's policies, LRH.
When LRH was in control, the church was growing, when DM took full power in 1990, based on what Marty Rathbun stated, that's when it started it's slow slide downward.
DM on source?
Maybe on some of the polices from LRH that served his agenda but there's a lot of polices that he's not following.
He's supposed to follow all the polices, not just the one's that support his agenda.
And to say that because DM followed a few LRH polices while ignoring all the rest means he's "on source" is fallacy.
To be truly "on source" DM needs to follow all of them.
Here's a link to that comparison between LRH and COB that I was referring to in my first reply.
Just click on the subject matter and you will see the comparison between LRH and COB at the bottom.
http://www.friendsoflrh.org/COBvsLRH/
Exactly how low are Indy standards to choose someone deeply involved in all of this as a leader?


