What's new

How did you envision your Body Thetans?

Challenge

Silver Meritorious Patron
Dear Challenge,

After recently investigating down stats in my area, I realized that production was crashed because some of my personal executive staff had gone awol. I believe they have taken refuge in your blue glass collection. Can you please round up the ones that do not legally belong to you and return them by Fedex to their rightful owner (me) at your earliest convenience?

Also, I really hope you have not been allowing Freddie (the fat one) to watch any of those cooking tv shows because he gets wayyy over-restimulated.

Sincerely, HH

LOL!
I suppose that you have not heard of my BT Big Band? I tried recruiting some Brass players for years on ARS and OCBM. I got a few good 'uns.
I think Freddie is that one out in my Magnolia tree.
Alan and I exchanged quite a few, so I'm not sure who belongs to whom. How about I send you some 'copies' and you select your guys?

Challenge
 

Gadfly

Crusader
I have not done OT 3:
In all the talk about BTs I have never visualised them as "really" living things. Just a kind of idea of an entity which can be "audited". But when I read this "...Hubbard believed these thought forms where conscious and just as real as you, .."
from the quoted post, BTs suddenly came "alive" for me.
Seriously. It made me realize that if if peole really do experience that way, or "mock them up" as really alive, then it seems like one hell of a noisy party going on around you, and in you all the time. How calm and quiet it must be when the party stops!
I'm guessing the BTs are never all that real to a ot of people who do OT3, but if they are experienced as "...conscious and just as real as you are...." then ....well, I dunno, seems to add more context to hubby going insane with all those BT fuckers around him. ...On the other hand, it could be a lot of fun...never a dull moment...never a lonley moment.....always someone to talk to.....would be nice if you could get them to run errand.

I ran quite a bit of OT III, many many years ago.

It was no big deal. When you run out an ARC break on yourself, you sometimes feel the upset. When you run out the ARC break from a BT, you sometimes feel some upset. Same magnitude, no big deal.

When you run out a withhold on yourself, it goes as it goes. When you do it with the BT, it also goes as it goes. No big deal.

When you run out a moment of pain, sometimes the pain turns on. You get through it. When you run out the pain of some BT, it is the same. No big deal.

Also, realize that these little buggers aren't all TURNED ON, and HUMMING violently out of control. There is generally no "big party". I never had a "conversation" with one, though if one actually admits the degree to which you TALK TO YOURSELF, endlessly and chronically about all sorts of nonsense, playing out little dramas in your head, well maybe it isn't so far-fethced.

Anyway, you deal with the OT III stuff largely in auditing. Otherwise, for most people not TYPE III, you have little attention on any of it outside of auditing. They have no meaning outside of auditing, and I doubt there are many people who even have any attention on them outside of auditing.

You actually have to "dig them out" to a degree, because they are NOT awake, causing any trouble or vibrating at any level. They only become accessible when you focus a tight beam of attention on them. Otherwise, for all practical purposes, even to a person OT III or above, and serious about auditing this stuff, they don't exist. Part of the "tech" involves doing drills to learn to focus the placing of attention onto small areas.

It is really simply a matter of a "slight" variation in viewpoint. Previously, some aspect of case was thought to be part of "yourself". Now, this aspect of case, which you still largely experience as part of "yourself" is viewed as "some other being". I doubt most people doing the levels have much concern about it. I never knew anyone who started running around complaining about all "the noise in my head" after starting OT III, and getting familiar with the BT paradigm, unless of course he or she was crazy to start with.
 

Challenge

Silver Meritorious Patron
Remember that OT3 was issued in 1967, I think. There were some revisions that came out around 1978 (NOTs era) and 1982 (I think), but these revisions did not directly change the EP. So when one studies the III pack, it says the EP is no BTs left. I seem to remember an HCOB that was said to be Mayo's error around 1982 that wasn't available to solo auditors, but was to the Solo C/S, saying if the guy gets stuck into an endless OT III trip then D/L or rehab a good point, have him attest, then put him onto NOTs. But I believe that got cancelled.

So the way it works now is the OT3 comp believes he has no BTs left, then maybe goes straight onto OT4 (Drug RD addressing BTs) and ARCXs when he finds there are more. And again on NOTs, same trip.

It might be humane to note this somewhere in the III pack, but not necessarily. I would guess that Hubbard didn't feel like changing it, if he even thought of it, and DM also never felt like changing it. Maybe the think is that as soon as you tell a pre-OT he only has to deal with the easy ones, as soon as he hits a problem on III he can rabbit and be allowed to attest. I certainly felt like that as an OT3 Solo sup, and would rather they maybe got an ARCX when they routed onto OT4 than blew from OT3 because it seemed uncomfortable.

Paul

The EP of OT3 is NO MORE BTs on OT3, or no more BTs with OT 3 in restimulation. This opens the door to the running of more BTs.
I learned that EP of 3 on the Cl 8 course, and don't recall the issue. I could I guess, go thru my pack and find it.

Challenge
 

Challenge

Silver Meritorious Patron
The 1000s of people who died in the Haitian earthquake will likely form a gigantic cluster, with the earthquake as a mutual incident.

Challenge
 

tiptoethrutheminefield

Patron with Honors
This realm of creativity (mocking up things) is largely unexamined and endeveloped in current Man. At this point in time, most people "mock up" by "buying into some framework or paradigm" (whether that be in the realm of science, religion, economics, philosophy, etc). And, doing so very much does affect them in some way (affects which are largely unconscious). The trick, the ability to learn, is how to CREATE BELIEF AT WILL. Most people can't even grasp the concept there. Because "belief" usually involves belieng in some already existing thing.

I always figured in Scientology, when I got to the end of the Bridge, that the LRH hand-written message would simply say:

"The entire substance of the Bridge was make-believe. There were no BTs. There were no implants. There were no moments of heavy charge. But, you needed to believe that to make it this far. NOW, you can abandon ALL belief systems, all methods, and CREATE your own. Have at it!"

But, I sort of doubt it. Hubbards seems to have had a little too much interest in getting others to buy into his framework, on some weird personal level.



Don't you think he also just wanted an easy way to make a living? Sci Fi writing of his caliber--any caliber in those days--couldn't even buy him a bungalow, I would imagine. He liked easy money, which can be seen in his yacht-selling stunt. He was hip to how Aimee Semple MacPherson and a host of other religious quacks cleaned up, and he was conscienceless enough to go about creating his own little empire of the same kind, only sci-fi based. Trouble with empires is that they turn a lot of people into Caligulas.

I had "wins" in Scientology, but I now think that was because I was around decent, intelligent people who truly wanted to help others, most of them.
That's a contact high right there!:)
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
The EP of OT3 is NO MORE BTs on OT3, or no more BTs with OT 3 in restimulation. This opens the door to the running of more BTs.
I learned that EP of 3 on the Cl 8 course, and don't recall the issue. I could I guess, go thru my pack and find it.

Challenge

The EP is no BTs left. This thing about having BTs is OK as long as they don't have OT3 in restim is not in the III pack.

And WTF is a BT with OT3 in restim? I would have used that for a euphemism of one freewheeling, but nothing else.

It's not like all the OT3 stuff, wherever it's found, is one big coherent, sensible whole, and all the parts match.

Paul
 

Gadfly

Crusader
The 1000s of people who died in the Haitian earthquake will likely form a gigantic cluster, with the earthquake as a mutual incident.

Challenge

That's not quite true, according to the "tech".

A shared bad experience is only part of it, but there needs to be INCREDIBLE FORCE, such as a planet blowing up, space ships colliding, or implanting. As far as I recall.

There needs to be some aspect of force that acts to collapse the entities TOGETHER.

But, I haven't read the issues on clusters recently. Anyone have the reference handy? I remember from OT III that Hubbard explained how and why clusters could form, other than from implants. As I remember he did give examples, but for the life of me, I don't remember. It has been consigned to that large garbage basket in my mind, where I place anything that no longer has any meaning or value to or for me.
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
That's not quite true, according to the "tech".

A shared bad experience is only part of it, but there needs to be INCREDIBLE FORCE, such as a planet blowing up, space ships colliding, or implanting. As far as I recall.

There needs to be some aspect of force that acts to collapse the entities TOGETHER.

But, I haven't read the issues on clusters recently. Anyone have the reference handy? I remember from OT III that Hubbard explained how and why clusters could form, other than from implants. As I remember he did give examples, but for the life of me, I don't remember. It has been consigned to that large garbage basket in my mind, where I place anything that no longer has any meaning or value to or for me.

You expect it to make sense?!!

Look at the assessment list for cluster-making incidents used as part of the cumulative cluster D/L trip. Items on there include drugs. In the HCOB it calls one a "horse incident" or something, and it wasn't an atomic-explosion horse. Here, I copied the list from the Prometheus Reports: "Accident, Impact, shooting, Injury, Illness, a drug, shock, Implant, heat, freezing, electrical, explosion, implosion, psychiatric incident, electrical, lightning, crash, burning, vacuum, radiation."

Paul
 

Gadfly

Crusader
This realm of creativity (mocking up things) is largely unexamined and endeveloped in current Man. At this point in time, most people "mock up" by "buying into some framework or paradigm" (whether that be in the realm of science, religion, economics, philosophy, etc). And, doing so very much does affect them in some way (affects which are largely unconscious). The trick, the ability to learn, is how to CREATE BELIEF AT WILL. Most people can't even grasp the concept there. Because "belief" usually involves belieng in some already existing thing.

I always figured in Scientology, when I got to the end of the Bridge, that the LRH hand-written message would simply say:

"The entire substance of the Bridge was make-believe. There were no BTs. There were no implants. There were no moments of heavy charge. But, you needed to believe that to make it this far. NOW, you can abandon ALL belief systems, all methods, and CREATE your own. Have at it!"

But, I sort of doubt it. Hubbards seems to have had a little too much interest in getting others to buy into his framework, on some weird personal level.



Don't you think he also just wanted an easy way to make a living? Sci Fi writing of his caliber--any caliber in those days--couldn't even buy him a bungalow, I would imagine. He liked easy money, which can be seen in his yacht-selling stunt. He was hip to how Aimee Semple MacPherson and a host of other religious quacks cleaned up, and he was conscienceless enough to go about creating his own little empire of the same kind, only sci-fi based. Trouble with empires is that they turn a lot of people into Caligulas.

I had "wins" in Scientology, but I now think that was because I was around decent, intelligent people who truly wanted to help others, most of them.
That's a contact high right there!:)

I have no way of knowing, and I stopped caring about it a long time ago.

There is no doubt that part of what Hubbard did was of the nature of a sham, a scam, an attempt and intention to trick and decieve. To make money? Probably partially. I have a gut feeling that THAT, while of some concern, was not the major or primary concern for him. I could be wrong.

But also, Hubbard may very well have been running a "black magical operation" on people through his system. That part of it he would NEVER tell anybody. Money would be necessary and help, but it doesn't seem to me that Hubbard was the typical materialist interested in playing with all sorts of big money toys. From what I have heard, he spent most of his time running things and conducting "research" (using the term very loosely).

He developed a VERY SLICK system to get people involved, keep them involved, extract lots of money from them, and who knows what else? One of his largest "tricks" was working out such a slick system to get people to willingly CONTRIBUTE their own living energy, time and minds! People in Scientology often fall over their own feet running to "help"! :whistling:

See, the vampire can't enter the room unless it is first invited in! He gets you to WANT what he convinces you that you need. And, you contribute to the charade on a mental level by buying into the whole thing. This aspect of creating a sphere of activity where so many people are thinking, intending, mocking up and acting in unison has strange "esoteric" or "occult" possibilities. On a certain level, I think he was conducting a big experiment of his own design. I do not think that DM is carrying on THAT aspect of it all. I think DM is just another sucker, who takes the whole sucker paradigm way too seriously. But, really, who knows?

I think Hubbard took the words of Aleister Crowley quite seriously, and I DO like Crowley, but Hubbard took it way too far:

"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law."

Hubbard took it WAY too far.
 

HelluvaHoax!

Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on
You expect it to make sense?!!

Look at the assessment list for cluster-making incidents used as part of the cumulative cluster D/L trip. Items on there include drugs. In the HCOB it calls one a "horse incident" or something, and it wasn't an atomic-explosion horse. Here, I copied the list from the Prometheus Reports: "Accident, Impact, shooting, Injury, Illness, a drug, shock, Implant, heat, freezing, electrical, explosion, implosion, psychiatric incident, electrical, lightning, crash, burning, vacuum, radiation."

:roflmao:

Also...your "cluster making" list is incomplete. It doesn't list this one:

"....a cluster formed by a this-lifetime implant dealt to a large group of people worldwide thru the treacherous application of a covertly debilitating mental technology that makes them all think the same degraded thoughts in compliance to one Big Being."

For more information on this implant, please refer to Scientology Grade Chart.
 

Gadfly

Crusader
You expect it to make sense?!!

Look at the assessment list for cluster-making incidents used as part of the cumulative cluster D/L trip. Items on there include drugs. In the HCOB it calls one a "horse incident" or something, and it wasn't an atomic-explosion horse. Here, I copied the list from the Prometheus Reports: "Accident, Impact, shooting, Injury, Illness, a drug, shock, Implant, heat, freezing, electrical, explosion, implosion, psychiatric incident, electrical, lightning, crash, burning, vacuum, radiation."

Paul

Wow! I have not read any of this in many years. Thanks for the "reference". Yeah, one sure does have to read in all sorts of nonsense to have it "make sense" with what you just pointed out. No doubt! That list is extremely vague and general. Shit, anything falls within the purview of an "accident"!!!! :confused2: :duh:

I suppose if two people dropped dead of heart attacks at the same time, per this "data" that they could form a "cluster" since it IS an "accident". In other words, anything can form a cluster! How amazingly convenient.

But really, as I have said before, why bother trying to make sense of any of it at all? I do it as a sort of game, as something to do for the moment, occasionally, when someone asks a question here, but otherwise, it doesn't exist for me. Cripes, really, the only time any of this even crosses my mind is when reading stuff here.
 
G

Gottabrain

Guest
"Do it til you're satisfied!"



Confidentiality Alert: Do not read if you are not OT VII or above!

The E.P. of great sex and OT VII are identical.

You gain complete certainty that you have been totally f*cked.

:roflmao:

I just love this, HH! This has got to go down as one of the best quotes about Scilo ever. :thumbsup:
 

Ron Paul

Patron
Just a kind of idea of an entity which can be "audited". But when I read this "...Hubbard believed these thought forms where conscious and just as real as you, .."
from the quoted post, BTs suddenly came "alive" for me.

And for me. But I kind of see it as a beautiful thing. As all matter being alive and merely assuming the form that it feels it must posses. Each Monad a living universe within the great Universe, all colliding and flowing in around each other. As each Thetan becomes aware of it's independence it becomes free from the cosmic dance and becomes cause over itself. Or, more correctly, realizes that it was always cause over itself and that is has never been any other way; only unrealized.
Very beautiful indeed.
 

Mystic

Crusader
:roflmao:

Also...your "cluster making" list is incomplete. It doesn't list this one:

"....a cluster formed by a this-lifetime implant dealt to a large group of people worldwide thru the treacherous application of a covertly debilitating mental technology that makes them all think the same degraded thoughts in compliance to one Big Being."

For more information on this implant, please refer to Scientology Grade Chart.

This ^^
 

lkwdblds

Crusader
Nice graphic presentation!

You know those little square yellow "post-ems", about 3" on each side? They have a little bit of "stickum" on the top part of the back, so you can "stick them" wherever you want?

Well, imagine about 200,000-300,000 of these, or maybe even MILLIONS, all with different messages written on them, some about thoughts, some about feelings, some about pain, and some about sex, stuck to you from head to your toes. Sometimes groups of "post-ems" unite together to form well-stacked and tight "clusters". Also inside of you, these "post-ems" are attached to your internal organs and going out attached to whatever mental energy exists outside of the range of the physical body. They can be stuck onto cells, areas of the body, body parts, just about anywhere you can IMAGINE!!!!! :omg:

Tha's how I envision body thetans! :thumbsup:

Very nice graphic representation of what it seems like. You captured it well, not much to add.
Lakey
 

freethinker

Sponsor
Originally Posted by FinallyFree and response from Gadfly
Yeah - pretty confusing. I have questions, if you would be so kind as to entertain me (OT III was my 'button' as a scientologist. But I did not even make it to Clear, thank God). You might be able to address all of them in one answer.:

- Are BT's the same a thetans, only stuck to an occupied body?

LRH's describe them as thetans who have been largely asleep the whole time (since the moment they were originally compacted together with other such unconscious thetans). They went unconscious due to the overwhelming force, invalidation and chaotic energy of HUGE INTENTIONALLY CONDUCTED IMPLANTS. There can be other ways for thetans to crunch up together, stick together and form "groupings" of mostly unconscious thetans. Such as space craft collisions. But the BIG EVENT, the one that Hubbard claims caused all of the trouble was 75 million years ago, when Xenu and cohorts intentionally smashed thetans together and formed huge clusters. Since then, none or maybe a few have woken up or become "unattached". The effect can be viewed as 1) negative for the many unconscious thetans, and 2) the many negative effects they have on the person with all of them stuck to him or her.

One of these BTs, or a group of them (known as a "cluster" of BTs), can be stuck ANYWHERE, though most often PCs experience them as being stuck to his or her body. Hubbard does stress that you are still "you", and you have somehow managed to be the one who "runs the show", but these little buggers can affect you JUST LIKE ANY OTHER ASPECT OF CASE WHEN IT GETS RESTIMULATED. So, just as some long lost pain of your own might restimulate by the sight of a similar environment, during a moment of pain or unconsciousness, so goes the notion that some pain in the case of SOME OTHER thetan might restimulate by the sight of a simalar environment.

The problem, as the theory goes, is that we can't differentiate "whose it is", the restimulated pain (or whatever), we don't see any of this phenomena as "other than ourselves", and the person confuses all these reactive impulses of MANY other thetans as HIS or HER OWN, since they basically occur "in your space". So, from this view, most of "your case" above OT III is not "really your case". But these reactive cases of many others, who you can't differentiate or experiences as anything other than yourself, AFFECT the PC just as his own case. More identity type phenomena, but here instead of the A=A=A of events, pains, emotions, sensations and pain with TIME, the A=A=A occurs between actual THETANS! THAT is the basic theory of OT III. Also, these can be attached to anything, even a ridge that you imagine exists 28 billion miles on the other side of Arcturus! If you experience it as "there", then it is "there".

- how is it that the BT’s supposedly effect you? If they are stuck to your body (or are they stuck to something else?) – how could they have influence over you?

They work how I explained above. I will give another analogy. For me I always imagined restimulation along the lines of "resonance". The idea is that all energy responds to like energy, by growing, and all dislike energies tend to cause other energies to change or dissipate.

Experiment #1. Take a shallow pan of water, at least 2 feet in diameter. Place a speaker, connected to an amplifier, aim it at the pan, with the amplifier attached to a signal generator. As you move through lower frequencies, you will find points where the vibrations of the speaker cause similar vibrations in the water. Resonance. Frequencies of energy cause similar frequencies of energy in the environment.

So, when some aspect of the environment is similar to some aspect of the content of some "negative energy memory bundle" (engram, call it whatever you want), that component of similar energy in the incident starts "vibrating" and comes alive, exciting the rest of the package of negative energy. Restimulation.

Take that idea and apply it to BTs. Something appears in the environment, it excites some aspect of the BT's case, and BINGO, it appears right there in YOUR SPACE, and you incorrectly interpret and experience the energy as your own. With all of the attendant negative side-effects. Remember, these little buggers are invisible - they are thetans. But, just like the purported PC, they each have a time track, a case, PTS items, right on down the line. And, the person cannot view or experience this energy as separate from his or herself. Why? Because the SOURCE of the energy is invisible. People tend to interpret energy existing "in their space" as being their "own". This is true whether or not OT III data is.


- Where does the BT go when you get rid of it?

According to LRH they will most likely go out and "pick up a body". In a sense it is a "person" just like you. When you "audit" them out, you have to keep in the same TRs, grant beingness, and persist helping the entity through the incident, as would any other auditor. People who frame this as "auditing out little aliens" are dumb, misinformed, and are confusing what is happening here with the details of the OT III implanting story.

- Can you audit a BT up to the point of it being able to get its own body?

Answered above. Yes. It "blows" as does any aspect of case, with the required F/N (and cog - though the cog can be as simple as "oh, it blew").

- what happened to the BT for it to be stuck to an occupied body rather than inhibit one itself?

There are handlings for BTs who "won't leave". Often, they can be PTS, and rarely, per Hubbard, they might be suppressive and require an entire special rundown to dislodge it. Simply, ANY process or list that can be done on a person, can be done on a BT. The aim is NOT to address its entire case, but only to free it up enough to leave and get back into its own "game of life".

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From what you've said above Gadfly,OTIII debunks the entire Scientolgy and Dianetics tech.

According to the tech a thetan has no mass, energy, space or location in. So therefore BT's which are some form of degraded thetan cannot be smasshed together as they have no substance, They can not stick together or to other things as they have no substance. In order to have a cluster it has to be material which per definition thetans are not.

Additionally, according to your analogy, you can't do Dianetics after you go clear because it would be a confusion as to whether your somatic or whatever was you or some BT or God forbid a cluster. So when your a mere preclear you can do Dianetics because you won't be confused. But after clear you will be. This goes to show that you were better off and had less confusion before you went clear because you had the ability to know they were your engrams. But after you would be confused as to where the hell the problem was coming from.

Additionally, with all the somatics a person can have with there own reactive mind, with 2-300,000 more reactive minds one would be frozen into extreme unfunctionable agony. Whadaya think?
 

Gadfly

Crusader
From what you've said above Gadfly,OTIII debunks the entire Scientolgy and Dianetics tech.

According to the tech a thetan has no mass, energy, space or location in. So therefore BT's which are some form of degraded thetan cannot be smasshed together as they have no substance, They can not stick together or to other things as they have no substance. In order to have a cluster it has to be material which per definition thetans are not.

Well, if it is true that YOU are a thetan, and I suspect that SOME version of that idea has some truth to it, realize that ANY condition that you find yourself in actually is an illusion and exists ONLY because you consider that it does. Make sense? Theoretically, along the lines of the "thetan" theory, YOU are a "static", with no mass, no wavelength, no space or location, BUT you can and very much do mock up and create, through postulates and considerations, space, time, mass and location. And once located, you make the big mistake of identifying with many of these arbitrary creations (illusions). You can feel "crushed". You can feel "squashed". You can feel "overwhelmed", and you can go the effect of "force". But, can a thetan? No, of course not. But, once you consider that you can, then you can and you do. Following me here? I agree with Hubbard, and many others, who express the idea that YOU create, enable and feed your own limitations (through what you accept as true - postulates, considerations, agreements). So, as far as BTs go, it is the SAME idea. If they actually can be crushed, or collapsed, or "stuck together", it is ONLY because they accept, believe and agree that they can. That is the long and the short of it. Of course a thetan can't have ANY force or mechanical effect influence it, BUT by virtue of how a thetan brings realities into existence, by agreement, it can become victim of anything it chooses to imagine.

Additionally, according to your analogy, you can't do Dianetics after you go clear because it would be a confusion as to whether your somatic or whatever was you or some BT or God forbid a cluster. So when your a mere preclear you can do Dianetics because you won't be confused. But after clear you will be. This goes to show that you were better off and had less confusion before you went clear because you had the ability to know they were your engrams. But after you would be confused as to where the hell the problem was coming from.

Let me clarify what the theories state. A person below "Clear" is entirely unable to differentiate between WHOSE charge it is. It just doesn't matter. Everything is run as if it were "yours". And it all seems to blow, without any concern for whose charge it is. Above Clear, one becomes able to differentiate, on a gradient, WHOSE charge it is. There is no more or less confusion. At the level above Clear, one now has a "higher awareness" and supposed greater tolerance for randomity, and so can finally comfortably confront the "Nature of the Being" as a combination of entities. There is no more confusion above Clear, because methods are supplied to resolve the problem. You learn how to detect and determine WHOSE charge it is. Again, as I said earlier, it is really no big deal to anyone running this stuff. The actual experience is not unlike any earlier auditing, and involves MORE of a SIGNIFICANCE regarding whose actually charge it is. But you run the same sort of stuff, and when the charge blows, it feels just like charge blowing in lower auditing, except now, supposedly thetans and clusters of thetans peel off in the process. Subjectively, for me, there was no big difference. You feel like something "left", and you feel like something "blew" just like in all earlier auditing.

Additionally, with all the somatics a person can have with there own reactive mind, with 2-300,000 more reactive minds one would be frozen into extreme unfunctionable agony. Whadaya think?

As I said, these buggers are supposedly largely asleep. Just as with any personal "case", it isn't all "keyed in" at one time. Little parts key in from time to time, and really, it is only during auditing that you ever contact and activate all the charge that is hidden away and carried around by the thetan. Most of the pain and unconsciousness is NOT in restimulation. Same with the BTs. Unless they are restimulated, it is pretty much as if they aren't there.

I think anyone familiar with the subject, even someone who agrees with it, would mostly agree with the above.

But again, most of any of this can only be real to you, and only affect you to the degree that you buy into it on some level. It is a theory. Past a certain point, entertaining possibilities about it all gets simply dumb.

Just download the entire confidential materials from Wikileaks, read everything from Power Processes on up through OT V, and answer your own questions within the framework of the THEORIES.

Answers above in BOLD.

Many Scientologists get a big button on OT III, because of the way it is presented. Hubbard promotes it as the BIG REASON WHY this entire sector of the galaxy has been in a state of collapse for the last 75 million years! It is pumped up as the entire reason behind the "4th dynamic engram" (whatever THAT is). The scenario of OT III is explained as the primary reason WHY CHAOS CAN AND WILL CONTINUE FOREVER, unless this gets addressed and handled. It is promoted as the sole reason why NO SOLUTION can or will bite along 3rd or 4th dynanic lines.

So sure, it gets to be a big button for people in Scientology. Obviously the Church PR machinery did a GOD job on you, if you have so much attention on it.

Plus there was all the drama added in about how Hubbard broke or almost broke his back "researching and figuring out the level". And how any person who contacts it, before they are made ready through proper set-ups (earlier Bridge steps), will "freewheel" through the implant and DIE of pneumonia! Not many have died!!!!!

There is just so much HYPE attached to OT III. That is a contrived and created reality. To a large degree it is of the nature of a phantasm. People buy into the hype and illusion.

I won't include my usual Mystic Disclaimer here, because most likely whatever Mystic might say about phantasms and illusions in regards to OT III would hit the nail right on the head! :omg:
 
Last edited:
This is all per Hubbard, not my ideas at all:
...
4. Supposedly one can once released from its current attachment to other BTs and/or you or your body. There is no procedure in Scn for helping them beyond getting rid of them from your space.

You can run dianetics on them if you've a mind too, or any other scientology process come to that. However, as you imply Paul, that's not an "official" part of Co$ practice. :)

As to what do they look like? More or less like any other thetan. :whistling:


Mark A. Baker
 

I told you I was trouble

Suspended animation
:roflmao:

Also...your "cluster making" list is incomplete. It doesn't list this one:

"....a cluster formed by a this-lifetime implant dealt to a large group of people worldwide thru the treacherous application of a covertly debilitating mental technology that makes them all think the same degraded thoughts in compliance to one Big Being."

For more information on this implant, please refer to Scientology Grade Chart.

Bum.

I need to run that now ... and I jumped on my e-meter a few years ago (it's in tiny little pieces).

:nervous:

I know! ... I can just go for a run instead and be at one with nature for awhile .... (and that will be of actual benefit to my health).

:lol::lol::lol:
 
Top