What's new

I had a glimpse of R6 Bank

Vinaire

Sponsor
I know I seem to be heading toward the next element of R6... POLITICS...

Shall I start a thread on that... shall I not start a thread on that... Shall I...

:hmm:
 

Zinjifar

Silver Meritorious Sponsor
But I must say, on my recent thread, I did found myself face to face with some very complicated stuff... Middle East is still embroiled with those kind of viewpoints on both sides.

.

Well, to be serious, there are very *real* problems in human society and beyond, including the 'problem of evil' itself. Those are questions complex enough to bedevil even the clearest sight, but, what's *less* than helpful is to attempt to stuff such real issues into Ron's mystery sandwich grab bag-o-worms.

Scientology *does* have all the answers to such complex issues and questions; to so load you down with its own horrors that you don't have time to 'put attention on' real questions.

R6 *deserves* to be mocked.

Zinj
 

Lesolee (Sith Lord)

Patron Meritorious
Ot II (http://www.freezoneearth.org/Prometheus04/otTwo/index.htm) lists the 21 different implant GPM's that were "installed" during the 36 days of implanting during Incident II (the catastrophe of 75 million years ago.)
The CC implant was also installed at this time according to Hubbard. This super manic psychic engram is the unconscious basis of humanity, and "groups" on this planet.
Vin intends this thread in a joking way. Even so your statement above is a bit wrong. According to OTIII 2nd handwritten note (28 Oct 68) and others we have

Incident 2 (up to the Pilot)
then Clearing Course implant (repeated - as the original was much earlier)
then OTII implants
and then 36 days of other picture implants.

The final version of the terminology for this lot seems to be

Incident 2
then
R6

The terminology has certainly changed as more data came to light. For example "the 7's" have eight items and are part of the CC now.
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
The final version of the terminology for this lot seems to be

Incident 2
then
R6

The terminology has certainly changed as more data came to light. For example "the 7's" have eight items and are part of the CC now.

No. In the III pack Hubbard says, "Incident 2 is R6, 75 million years ago" or something very similar. If you have it there take a look.

I thought the 7s got the name because it came after level 6, although I don't remember him explaining where the name came from.

Paul
 

uniquemand

Unbeliever
R6 is the collection of pictures, purposes, scripts, etc., ostensibly installed during an implant. It is most certainly NOT addressed by Dianetics in any of its forms. It is, instead, handled on R6EW (R6 "end words", see http://www.freezoneearth.org/Prometheus04/powerR6/index.htm), and then in the Clearing Course. If a person skips those, then it should be handled by the time the person completes OTIII.

Paul, my information is that "the sevens" referred to the number of times you checked through the various implant platens on the CC (7).
 

Lesolee (Sith Lord)

Patron Meritorious
No. In the III pack Hubbard says, "Incident 2 is R6, 75 million years ago" or something very similar. If you have it there take a look.

HCO BULLETIN OF 4 MAY 1968

"When one runs Incident I out of one thetan and then Incident 2 out of another (thinking it was the first one) one can get a partially run body thetan who won’t blow but who may start to go on through the whole of R6 automatically …"

HCO BULLETIN OF 2 OCTOBER 1968
"A preOT can free wheel into R6 if you run only an INC 2."

And
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 OCTOBER 1968
"Only those in this Old Confederation have Inc 2 and R6. All CC and OTII materials are in R6 75 million years ago."

Those references tell me that R6 and Incident 2 are not the same. Of course you are also right. In the same damn bulletin he says …

HCO BULLETIN OF 2 OCTOBER 1968
"Inc 2 is R6 75 million years ago."

They conflict and I assumed there was a typo/OCR error because there are quite a few in that "tech vol". How do you resolve the conflict? (And don't tell me to read it again!)
 

Lesolee (Sith Lord)

Patron Meritorious
Paul, my information is that "the sevens" referred to the number of times you checked through the various implant platens on the CC (7).
http://freezoneamerica.com/Prometheus04/clearCourse/index.htm
Part A is the sevens, and there are 8 items per set. I assumed that only 7 per set were found initially, but it is only an assumption.

The wikileaks version also has them as the 7's for the BE/DO/HAVE/STAY sets, although there are 8 items per.

CC is of course 10 runs not 7.
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
They conflict and I assumed there was a typo/OCR error because there are quite a few in that "tech vol". How do you resolve the conflict? (And don't tell me to read it again!)

Disclaimer: Talking Hubbard here, not what I now believe.

The only problem I see is "Only those in this Old Confederation have Inc 2 and R6." The others are explained by the principle of cross-auditing, i.e. you run Inc 2 out of one BT, and Inc 1 out of a second. The unrun Inc 2 on the second one causes it to run Inc 2 on automatic (freewheel).

I always understood the "and" in ". . . have Inc 2 and R6" in the sense of "or", meaning "in other words." I'm not saying that is correct, but that is how I interpreted it for myself.

The meaning of "R6" changed throughout the years, i.e. it was kinda slippy. I think Hubbard had the concept of "R6" being the core bank, originally addressed at Level 6. As he changed the tech to address his changing view of the core stuff, he dragged the term "R6" along with him, with its meaning creeping around to fit his requirements. When he thought the basic bank came from an implant at trillions three (I think he said that. Trillions three is 10^36 years ago) he called that implant "R6." That's in one of the tapes or films, either on R6EW or the CC. He then had the main implant addressed on the CC. I forget the date he first plotted that one as. He later changed it to 10^15. I don't remember if he revised that to 75 mill or not. Then the main implant to address was Inc 2 at 75 mill, so ALL of that got the slippy "R6" name, not just the CC bit. That's my idea, anyway.

Paul
 

Lesolee (Sith Lord)

Patron Meritorious
I always understood the "and" in ". . . have Inc 2 and R6" in the sense of "or", meaning "in other words." I'm not saying that is correct, but that is how I interpreted it for myself.
Thank you. A well reasoned response. :thumbsup:

I found another reference to shoot my argument in the foot. In the OTIII "2nd note" of 28 Oct '68 titled "Incident 2" on page 4 it says "The pictures contain god, ... you name it, it's in this implant we call in its entirety "R6".

That seems to be the most recent reference of the lot.

Just to add to the confusion is the (undated) Incident 2 platen from OTIII. After the pilot it says "(R6 material follow, then days of pictures, God, Devil etc.)"

Make up your freakin mind already! :grouch:

Oh and then there's that earlier bit in there
"It was then pulled down and he was (as part of a group implanted with R6."
:melodramatic:

I have obviously fallen into R6 and don't know which way is up.:bigcry:

Reading R6 as a subset of Incident 2 might work slightly less badly than having them synonymous, although I don't think all the references can actually be logically consistent.
 

alex

Gold Meritorious Patron
And


Those references tell me that R6 and Incident 2 are not the same. Of course you are also right. In the same damn bulletin he says …



They conflict and I assumed there was a typo/OCR error because there are quite a few in that "tech vol". How do you resolve the conflict? (And don't tell me to read it again!)

Incident 2 is the incident, R6 is the content.

Perhaps too subtle a distinction? But maybe if R6 is thought of as a package and Inc 2 is the trip to the installer? Sort of the same sort of different viewpoints on each?
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
Reading R6 as a subset of Incident 2 might work slightly less badly than having them synonymous, although I don't think all the references can actually be logically consistent.

They don't have to be logically consistent, if Hubbard's guiding principle is that "R6 is the REAL core hot stuff" and the core changes as his who-knows-what-fueled ideas change.

Paul
 

knn

Patron Meritorious
Those references tell me that R6 and Incident 2 are not the same.
R6 is only a part of Incident 2.

In incident 2 other previous implants were reimplanted (e.g. the CC content). Thus R6 is the content not previously implanted but newly implanted during Incident 2.
 

Operating DB

Truman Show Dropout
Hubbard can't even get his own stories straight. Sounds like he just made up shit with with every lecture or writing he gave.
 
Top