RogerB
Crusader
Boobs?Originally Posted by RogerB View Post
Time to get on with what's important in life . . . .
Rog
Paul
PS: did we ever get to see the promised land of them offered boobs?

R
Boobs?Originally Posted by RogerB View Post
Time to get on with what's important in life . . . .
Rog
Paul

Ok. I know I'm new here, but, damn it, at last I'm offended ! There it is again, talk about boobs, Boobs, boobs, boobs, boobs. All this talk about boobs. I'm an ass man. Has there there been even one word about that fine part? No. Not one word. Just boobs, boobs, boobs. I must depart in search of some ass talk and pixtures.
After I've seen some.......I'll be back.
This post made me giggle, Mick. I get it, I think, but I also think that you're a cranky ole 'one stop shop' bastard at times........ Maybe that's why I luv ya.![]()
Don't agree though that one airing one's grievances equates to "pathetic" or the "hallmark" of Scientologists. From my experience, most Scios don't share what they actually feel, and to me it's not "pathetic" coz ya communicate your hurt over being slammed by someone or something who ya had faith and trust in.
He is, I think the same problem you have with Emma's rant occurs with Dexters.
It's hard to get personal about it. Dexters post should be relabled "I have a new opinion about emma" and Emmas post should be "I have a new opinion about terril (or what ever freezoner pissed in her cheerios)" That way there is no colateral damage.
You even posted a thread about it about being a [me]-ologist.
Personally, as a never have been scientologists, seeing the freezone / cos success stories are invaluable in keeping any one with an IQ above room temperature away from the scientology cult. I think Alanzo wrote that scientology worst enemy is actually scientology. When you see applied as intended reasonable people, like yourself, come to the conclusion that it's pretty much worthless.
So in an effort to not make it personal, I think emma and dex do a diservice to each other. Chances are a phone call or a PM would have settled the difference. Instead you now have PR efforts and camps setting up for war all over perceived slights.
I'm not sure why people (you / terril) who always want to be peace bringers keep stirring the pot with weird none posts. Granted I have only a small partial view into what set emma off but she is entitled to her opinion. I actually agree that any one who has read this forum and all the associated issues with scientology and thinks hubbard insanity is a worth while subject must have a mental deficiency. You wouldn't go on a 5 page rant about some dude on the internet calling freezoners stupid, yet emma has to kowtow to unknown sensibilities when expressing her opinion. Seems like a double standard.
Ok. I know I'm new here, but, damn it, at last I'm offended ! There it is again, talk about boobs, Boobs, boobs, boobs, boobs. All this talk about boobs. I'm an ass man. Has there there been even one word about that fine part? No. Not one word. Just boobs, boobs, boobs. I must depart in search of some ass talk and pixtures.
After I've seen some.......I'll be back.

Ok. I know I'm new here, but, damn it, at last I'm offended ! There it is again, talk about boobs, Boobs, boobs, boobs, boobs. All this talk about boobs. I'm an ass man. Has there there been even one word about that fine part?
Long ago I put the FZ Success Stories thread on ignore. I haven't seen one post to it for years.
Are there ESMBers who *didn't* put it on ignore, maybe because they don't know how to, and got annoyed by the occasional post Terril made to it? (The "Ignore thread" option is in the "Thread Tools" menu).
Paul
It won't be too long before all scientologists (in or out of the CofS) recognise the liability of using that word to describe their beliefs or activities. The scientology brand name is irreversibly tainted. Some bright spark needs to come up with a less-loaded label for whatever aspects of scientology they choose to use.
"Spiritology" has been tried but that seems to be too lame and tainted by association. I can think of several alternatives but they all make me feel uncomfortable.
Any ideas from those practicing some aspect of scio-tech?
Ha ha!
It sounds like the academic masters degree level course of study for sanitation workers of the future, as in,
"What's your major?" "Sanitology." "Oh, wow! So have you picked a topic for your thesis?" "Yeah, my thesis is going to be on Twenty-first Century Methods and Systems for Recovery of Previously Undetectable Micro-Unit Precious Metals from Twentieth-Century Landfills.![]()
I'm outraged at the blatant sexist tone of this board
Time for some boy parts to toy with...
if only in the imagination![]()
I think Sanitology is a great name. It even sounds like the dreaded S-word. I was so impressed with my brilliance in thinking of it just over a year ago that I went and registered sanitology.com. However, I didn't renew the domain name when it came due a month or so ago, and I see that it is available again as I write if anyone wants it.
Paul
Sure there has. See post #9 here from yesterday in praise of a fine ass in a thread showing a video of same: http://forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=20944.
Paul
Admittedly, manboobs don't have much of a fan base, but, butts are a different story (or, so I hear) and nobody specified.
Of course, there's always Beardsley, if you meant different 'parts':
![]()
Zinj
I hate to tell you this, but... http://zippythepinhead.com/Merchant...=1-Apr-99&Category_Code=a1999&Product_Count=0
To me, the upset over this was not over you locking the forum, but over you calling all Freezoners "fucking stupid". .


Is this over and done yet?
![]()
I don't think Dexter or Marina or Mark Baker are stupid, But I DO think it's a dumb (stupid) idea to go on calling yourselves Scientologists when you clearly are not. There is no value in it. And I wouldn't and don't ever want to again be associated with that kind (The true Scientology kind) of behaviour and I don't understand why anyone else would.

I think they should just call themselves "Squirrels". I really loves the squirrels.![]()
