I have an MU on Indies

[Anonycat]

You are a recent arrival here. You are pig ignorant. You have already received far more attention than you deserve. You have barely passed puberty in your juvenile emotionally retarded use of pathetic sarcasm. Do you seriously think that your fukwit attempts at humour are actually appreciated by anyone over the age of 14?
Hubbard taught that one could bring people up the tone scale by communicating with them at a slightly higher tone level. Given that you are a slimy little excuse for a human being I am guessing that offering to thrash your butt would bring you upscale a bit.

I must have missed something. I read cookies asking you, if you told prospective clients that you were not accredited as a counselor or mental health professional, or something similar. I didn't see where they presupposed your business methods with new clients, but asked.

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

In the begining was the word. And the word was misunderstood.

In the beginning was the weird. And the weird was scientology.

 

[I told you I was trouble]

You are a recent arrival here. You are pig ignorant. You have already received far more attention than you deserve. You have barely passed puberty in your juvenile emotionally retarded use of pathetic sarcasm. Do you seriously think that your fukwit attempts at humour are actually appreciated by anyone over the age of 14?
Hubbard taught that one could bring people up the tone scale by communicating with them at a slightly higher tone level. Given that you are a slimy little excuse for a human being I am guessing that offering to thrash your butt would bring you upscale a bit.

Dearie me, now you've gone completely overboard and you'll have upset poor Terril's delicate sensibilities (he isn't fond of 'ad hom' and no doubt will have promptly reported you to the mods).









​

 

[Moderator 2]

You are a recent arrival here. You are pig ignorant. You have already received far more attention than you deserve. You have barely passed puberty in your juvenile emotionally retarded use of pathetic sarcasm. Do you seriously think that your fukwit attempts at humour are actually appreciated by anyone over the age of 14?
Hubbard taught that one could bring people up the tone scale by communicating with them at a slightly higher tone level. Given that you are a slimy little excuse for a human being I am guessing that offering to thrash your butt would bring you upscale a bit.

I'm back from my brief holiday now.

Just a reminder;

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?2-Board-Rules

Forum Rules

1. Treat others with respect.
You are to respect every other user on the board despite any personal, religious and political differences. The following will not be tolerated:•Personal insults
•Ad hominems
•Threats or promotion of violence

If the insults and ad hominem attacks continue bans will follow. There are no rules regarding other logical fallacies.

M2

 

[uniquemand]

oy vey!

 

[ChuckNorrisCutsMyLawn]

You have already received far more attention than you deserve.

Coming from someone who gives thousands of hours of attention to imaginary disembodied space aliens ... Does anyone else see the irony here?

 

[10oriocookies]

You are a recent arrival here. You are pig ignorant. You have already received far more attention than you deserve. You have barely passed puberty in your juvenile emotionally retarded use of pathetic sarcasm. Do you seriously think that your fukwit attempts at humour are actually appreciated by anyone over the age of 14?
Hubbard taught that one could bring people up the tone scale by communicating with them at a slightly higher tone level. Given that you are a slimy little excuse for a human being I am guessing that offering to thrash your butt would bring you upscale a bit.

Im not posting on here for attention nor to be funny or sarcastic. I apologize if you took it that way. I only want your future clients to have a choice based in fact. From what I understand you have no credentials, formal education or licenses to be delivering mental health type activities. You have scn, the same philosophy that also taught TR Lie or whatever the GO checksheet says. Its purpose was to teach scientology staff how to lie, skirt issues, etc. There's many more examples of this type of thing.

Thats part of the tech you are so vigorously defending. You have the right to believe that and all the rest of Ron's work, but when it comes to using that body of data to help others, I think you should be honest beforehand. If that upsets you, im sorry. Name calling, threats or whatever tech you are trying on me to bring me up the tone scale have no effect on me. Maybe just agree to be honest in the future and we can call it a day?

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

..

Originally Posted by Ralph Hilton
You are a recent arrival here. You are pig ignorant. You have already received far more attention than you deserve. You have barely passed puberty in your juvenile emotionally retarded use of pathetic sarcasm. Do you seriously think that your fukwit attempts at humour are actually appreciated by anyone over the age of 14? Hubbard taught that one could bring people up the tone scale by communicating with them at a slightly higher tone level. Given that you are a slimy little excuse for a human being I am guessing that offering to thrash your butt would bring you upscale a bit.

H

Hey buddy, last time I looked, one of us joined a
mind-control, dead alien hunting cult--and it wasn't me. ​

 

[programmer_guy]

You are a recent arrival here. You are pig ignorant. You have already received far more attention than you deserve. You have barely passed puberty in your juvenile emotionally retarded use of pathetic sarcasm. Do you seriously think that your fukwit attempts at humour are actually appreciated by anyone over the age of 14?
Hubbard taught that one could bring people up the tone scale by communicating with them at a slightly higher tone level. Given that you are a slimy little excuse for a human being I am guessing that offering to thrash your butt would bring you upscale a bit.

Very nasty post, but I prefer that you stay here and interact (I wouldn't report this to the mods).
"The way out [of a cult] is the way through" which can take many years.

Good luck... and "may The Force be with you".

 

[I told you I was trouble]

Very nasty post, but I prefer that you stay here and interact (I wouldn't report this to the mods).
"The way out [of a cult] is the way through" which can take many years.

I agree and I wouldn't have reported it either because I honestly think we can sort things out ourselves most times and the mods shouldn't be hassled with such twaddle (I said twaddle!).

Happy New Year everyone .... we're all ex cult and whether we still hold some of 'it' close to our hearts or not I believe if it were ever necessary most of us would have each others backs, which is not something we could ever have felt during our time in the cult.

Stay ... and be as grumpy as you like Ralph (perhaps you should come and sit next to me, we'd probably get along).

 

[MrNobody]

You are a recent arrival here. <ridiculous TR-Bullbait snipped>

I'm not into 4chan, but AFAIK there's at least one thing they're doing right: Almost everybody posts anonymously over there, which means that the content of a post counts, not the timespan of membership of a certain poster or his/her/its name.

Now, when I compare the content of 10oriocookies posts with the content of yours, 10oriocookie wins.

Jus' sayin'

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

I agree and I wouldn't have reported it either because I honestly think we can sort things out ourselves most times and the mods shouldn't be hassled with such twaddle (I said twaddle!).

Happy New Year everyone .... we're all ex cult and whether we still hold some of 'it' close to our hearts or not I believe if it were ever necessary most of us would have each others backs, which is not something we could ever have felt during our time in the cult.

Stay ... and be as grumpy as you like Ralph (perhaps you should come and sit next to me, we'd probably get along).

We've had our differences recently Trouble so perhaps I ought to weigh in here. For me, there's a difference between saying someone is misguided or deluded, and questioning their good faith or integrity by saying we're "pretenders" (unlike Chrissie Hynde and co.).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7Hy7uAb_eU

Everyone I've met on the FZ, and most of the people I knew on staff when I was in the CofS, was and were there to help people (or try to). In the the case of the Freezoners I knew, often they were aware of the limitations of the tools they were using and were at least starting to reach for better ones, but because they'd had experience of using the Tech they were taught and had seen good results from it, they used it. So, saying people who had dedicated themselves in this way are pretending crosses a line.

If you were saying it tongue in cheek, on the other hand, then good bullbait but I should point out that even in the CofS you're supposed to tell people you're going to be doing the bullbait drill on them before you actually do it.

Regards,

Cats .

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

I'm not into 4chan, but AFAIK there's at least one thing they're doing right: Almost everybody posts anonymously over there, which means that the content of a post counts, not the timespan of membership of a certain poster or his/her/its name.

Now, when I compare the content of 10oriocookies posts with the content of yours, 10oriocookie wins.

Jus' sayin'

I think it takes guts on here to post under your real name. I don't do it because I don't want the CofS on my case, but props to those who do.

I've seen discussions on other boards about whether or not people should post anonymously, and the consensus seems to be that people behave better when they post under their real names.

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

Just want to second what you said here though;

Happy New Year everyone .... we're all ex cult and whether we still hold some of 'it' close to our hearts or not I believe if it were ever necessary most of us would have each others backs, which is not something we could ever have felt during our time in the cult.

 

[I told you I was trouble]

I haz crossed the line (and I iz not coming back).

We've had our differences recently Trouble so perhaps I ought to weigh in here. For me, there's a difference between saying someone is misguided or deluded, and questioning their good faith or integrity by saying we're "pretenders" (unlike Chrissie Hynde and co.).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7Hy7uAb_eU

Everyone I've met on the FZ, and most of the people I knew on staff when I was in the CofS, was and were there to help people (or try to). In the the case of the Freezoners I knew, often they were aware of the limitations of the tools they were using and were at least starting to reach for better ones, but because they'd had experience of using the Tech they were taught and had seen good results from it, they used it. So, saying people who had dedicated themselves in this way are pretending crosses a line.

If you were saying it tongue in cheek, on the other hand, then good bullbait but I should point out that even in the CofS you're supposed to tell people you're going to be doing the bullbait drill on them before you actually do it.

Regards,

Cats .

I couldn't care less what you're 'supposed to do' in the cofs Cats and I meant every word I said about the great pretenders ... people playing at being therapists are being every bit as silly as people ligging around in fake navy suits and I very much doubt they are misguided or deluded.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ujv9aEUSyQ



​

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

Re: I haz crossed the line (and I iz not coming back).

I couldn't care less what you're 'supposed to do' in the cofs Cats and I meant every word I said about the great pretenders ... people playing at being therapists are being every bit as silly as people ligging around in fake navy suits.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ujv9aEUSyQ



​

Trouble, people KNOW if they're pretending. That's the problem with your argument; it doesn't lend itself to any consideration of ambiguity or matter of interpretation. It's not the same as saying someone's deluded or unqualified to do what they're doing, where you can at least think you're doing the right thing and making a positive difference even if you're not.

 

[I told you I was trouble]

Re: I haz crossed the line (and I iz not coming back).

Trouble, people KNOW if they're pretending. That's the problem with your argument; it doesn't lend itself to any consideration of ambiguity or matter of interpretation. It's not the same as saying someone's deluded or unqualified to do what they're doing, where you can at least think you're doing the right thing and making a posirtive difference even if you're not.

It isn't an argument ... its a statement (of fact).

They pretend in the cofs and later they pretend in the indie zone to be something that they are not.

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

It isn't an argument ... its a statement (of fact).

They pretend in the cofs and later they pretend in the indie zone to be something that they are not.

The only people who know whether that's true or not are the people themselves, but I have to say it very much much doesn't look that way to me.

OK, just an illustration; how do you know whether I'm genuinely indignant about Freezoners here, and people who support them, being called "pretenders", or whether I'm just pretending to be (I could be, after all )? You don't; only I do.

 

[I told you I was trouble]

The only people who know whether that's true or not are the people themselves, but I have to say it very much much doesn't look that way to me..

OK, just an illustration; how do you know whether I'm genuinely indignant about Freezoners here, and people who support them, being called "pretenders", or whether I'm just pretending to be (I could be, after all )? You don't; only I do.

If someone jumps into an airplane wearing a pilots uniform (or not) and with feigned authority and some 1950's knowledge of aircraft (gleaned from a known weirdo who knew nothing about aviation but managed to con people into believing he did) and starts whizzing around the sky with passengers on board ... he is pretending/acting as if he is a pilot and I couldn't give a rats rectum whether he knows it or not or if he is well intentioned or not or even if the passengers are all loving every moment of the flight and know the circumstances fully.

He is pretending to be a pilot ... but isn't one.

I'm out now ... Happy New Year!

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

If someone jumps into an airplane wearing a pilots uniform (or not) and with feigned authority and some 1950's knowledge of planes (gleaned from a known weirdo who knew nothing about aviation but managed to con people into believing he did) and starts whizzing around the sky with passengers on board ... he is pretending/acting as if he is a pilot and I couldn't give a rats rectum whether he knows it or not or if he is well intentioned or not or even if the passengers are all loving every moment of the flight and know the circumstances fully.

He is pretending to be a pilot ... but isn't one.

I'm out now ... Happy New Year!

That's making my point Trouble, not yours. If he can actually fly the plane (and land it) competently then he's a pilot in reality, whatever certification he may or may not have. If I tried to do it I would be pretending, and it would soon be obvious; the plane would crash, collide with something or never take off in the first place. That's the difference.

Happy New Year to you too!