OK, one more thing.
By the way, I do believe you... but if you were making this up, I would write the same things. This chain is for ANYONE who has been hit, punched, pushed around, had hot coffee thrown on them, screamed and cussed at by a Scientologists. I'm sorry to all those decent people out there who never hit or screamed at another when they were a Scientologist and maybe think it silly to attribute this kind of behavior to a Scientologist in particular. Well... what I'm saying is that there are clues and hints in LRH's teachings that a PERSON can USE if they are a Scientologist to JUSTIFY hitting someone or screaming at them viciously. I'm not saying it's part of Scientology at all. But I do know that there are elements of LRH's teachings that can be USED to justify this kind of behavior and so it actually does not shock me to hear a story about a Scietnology exec or staff member doing something like this.
In the very beginning, when Scientologists get taught the Communications Course and they do TRs, Training Routines -- There is the TR 4, where the coach is supposed to try to get up and leave to avoid answering the question, "do Birds Fly?" or "Do Fish Swim?" and it is a FLUNK if the trainee, the person doing the TR, LETS THE COACH LEAVE. I was trained, and so are all Scientologists, to PHYSICALLY prevent someone from leaving in that drill. Later, this is included in Scientology Counselling. Counsellors are trained to always sit by the door of a counselling room and to PHYSICALLY block their pre-clear (person getting counselling) from leaving the room. The explanation for this is that "the reactive mind", the part of the mind that Scientology believes to be the root of all evil (besides the other stuff on the Advanced Levels), can take over and cause someone to react and to dramatize to prevent them from getting better. So right there, there is a door open to the non-recognition of the pre-clears RIGHT to freely walk out of the auditing room.
In the Hubbard policy letter called "Keeping Scientology Working" -- LRH kind of makes some deragatory comment about Democracy. OK, that is just one sentence, it might not seem like it means much. But I will tell you that it's actually a very important thing to know that LRH did not like Democracy. In the United States we live by the rule of law. Laws are set and determined by people who get voted for, our representatives. We all have some say in how we are governed that way. So -- if someone doesn't like Democracy, they probably don't like following the laws that we have passed. LRH absolutely would have wanted to be some kind of great leader setting all the laws and rules himself, leaving no one else a vote.
Look, you have a right to pursue happiness as long as it is legal. There are many many legal things that are fun to do. It happens to NOT be fun if someone hits me. Especially hard too. Now, in most of America, it has been determined to be ILLEGAL for someone to hit you, cause harm to your person, assualt -- there are many names for it. This society as a large group of people decided a while ago to make it illegal to assault people. It is part of Democracy that got his law into place and if will stay in place as long as we all decide we like and are happy with this law.
Now, Mr. Scientologist over there in LV wants to come along and say the he is somehow ABOVE Democracy and our rules and laws.... just maybe LRH's anti democracy crap is letting him think that way, and he thinks it is OK to hit someone, to be above the law.
I have met Scientologists who DID think they were above the law, and they used LRH"s teachings to support these views. NOt, the majority, not EVERYONE, but enough to make me realize that Scientology teachings are peppered with open holes for this kind of behavior. I met a Scientologist who had openly admitted to me that he was involved with a hit and run car accident. He'd purposefully accelerated his car towards another car whom he THOUGHT was a drug dealer, just to scare him, then--- after he smashed in the guys car accidentally, he backed up and he just took off and drove away and never reported it. He felt that he had "delivered an effective blow to the enemies of the group" in doing so. The quotations are out of the Intro to Scientology Ethics Book, it's a step that Scientologists do to get out of the condition of Liability. This guys may not even be a Scientologist anymore, but at that moment in time, in his OWN MIND, he was applying "Scientology."
Another example. I had a boss that I was working for and one of his other employees, a married man, had made an inapproriate pass at me while I was working with him. I told my Boss. My boss DID NOTHING. I was upset about this. My Boss cited the L. Ron Hubbard policy letter about ethics protection. He said that this married man was "upstat" which was a Scientology term for the fact that the guy did his job and got his products regularly, on time and so he was not going to discipline him or even bring it up. This was according to an L. Ron Hubbard policy, to let "upstats" get away with whatever they want.
If you search the internet and look up tommy gorman's story, about how his wife had been raped before he had married her, by a Scientology church Executive and both she and him were told NOT to tell the police by other Scientologists!!!! They got mad at her for it and not the Church Exec because this exec was apparently "UPSTAT." Those are stupid Scientology policies, they don't work in REAL life. In REAL life, you HAVE to punish criminals, it DOES NOT MATTER how hard they work and how much money they make, they broke the law.
Us Americans, us democrats, we want a society where we do not get unjustly physically hit. We do not want a society where anyone can just hit someone because they feel like it. I'm not talking about justifyable self defense, I'm talking about using unnecessary pain and force. People used to whip their slaves back in the old days. Many human rights activists risked their lives, gave their lives over the years to CHANGE that, so that there was NO Slavery and whipping and hitting others to gain compliance is now against the law.
If you are robbing a store and have a gun in your hand, expect the police to tackle you and hit you. But if you are in that store legally and there is an unlocked door that you curiously looked inside, the police, that store owner, has NO RIGHT to hit you or discipline you beyond a "Please don't go in there, I'm sorry I didn't lock the door and put a big sign on it"
OK, enough of my soap box