Hi, Lionheart,
You have made comments directly to people about their practice of Scn. You've written a number of posts evidencing distaste with both the ideas in Scn and with the practice of it.
This does convey an opinion and it evidently is one to which you are holding on since I've not seen evidence that it has changed.
Whose to say one can't have an opinion when one is released?!! It is your evaluation that my opinion
should change - is that because you don't like the opinion?
Letting go isn't a command. It's not a scn process! It is an invitation and genuine non-scn releasing tech can't be used as evidence of "case" just because someone is expressing beliefs.
I know scn tech is often used to make people wrong in scn, but outside the Hubbard box, using other technologies to make people wrong or to impose censorship of criticism is not particularly constructive. Scientology does that a lot, but we don't play Hubbard's slavish games any more.
After lots of releasing and letting go, one doesn't become some sort of ineffective, undecided sponge. In my experience when one is released, one has a powerful source to tap into, when one desires to do so, without the liabilities normally associated with action and expression of opinion.
Please don't mistake opinions for "case". And please don't try to use tech that you don't practice to censor or make wrong. This is a discussion board and opinions should be allowed to be freely expressed.
Hubbard wanted to shut people up, we don't have to play that game any more.