Gadfly
Crusader
Reminds me so much of my favorite scene in "The Bladerunner" where Rutger Hauer's character is about to die.
I've done the same thing so many times.
It's weird how we have come to consider being wet in clothing as something to desperately avoid. You watch people huddled at the doors of stores when the rain comes pouring down, afraid to go out. It's so silly.
I just walk out, thinking, "Ahhh, how wonderful! We need this stuff to sustain life."
And thunder! Wow!
In martial arts training, we used to sit in very cold water to help develop chi and to transcend the body's resistance. Our considerations of "pain" and "discomfort" give them dominance over us.
It's funny that you mention the thing about "avoiding getting wet", because my own socially-defined and created "natural inclination" is to "get out of the rain". I am one of these people who "watches myself" like I might watch a movie or complete strangers. The same with this thing about "getting out of the rain, and remaining dry", as if to not do so is "uncomfortable" or at least is somewhat of a nuisance because you have to change into dry clothes at some point (or get cold, or mess up the clean floors or carpet, or . . . ). Part of it IS "practical", but like anything, context changes everything!
I don't know if we actually "need this stuff to sustain life", but ONE most certainly MUST ADD THESE MOMENTS OF INNER DEPTH AND MEANING to whatever is "out there", if you want to "enjoy a happy life". It seems that when people cease "adding to life", and "filling it with meaning and value" - that they fade away and die. That might be part of why some elderly people suddenly take a turn for the worse, and die. They stop "creating life" for themselves. :confused2:
One thing that hooked me into Scientology right in the very beginning was the first chapter of "A New Slant on Life". Hubbard talked about how "a little child derives all of his HOW of life from the grace he puts upon life". Hubbard added, "one's attitude toward life (or some aspect of life) makes every difference in ones living". Hubbard gave examples, some dumb, but his point was valid.
Hubbard was 100% spot-on correct. Life is for you, life unravels for you, and life is experienced by you, based largely on HOW YOU first conceive of it. There ARE tidbits of brilliance within the larger inane subject of Scientology - this is one of them.
This notion exist all throughout New Age literature, that YOUR mental world CREATES a PATTERN for the universe to enact and bring about. In a very real sense ones experience of any aspect of the universe is determined greatly or possibly completely by HOW one conceives of it in the first place. The world you see, feel and experience is largely determined BY YOU (by your beliefs, your attitudes about certain things, by your fixed ideas, by your values, by your considerations about a great many things, etc.). This is as true for the things you like as for the things you don't. The world, as you experience it IS an "illusion". It is a "fiction" of your own creation, but THAT is NOT necessarily a bad thing, once one becomes aware of how it all works.
I worked for a great part of my life to get rid of all mental things, such as considerations, agreements, opinion, and I do now see them as the arbitrary creations that they are. BUT, also, knowing that, I can also choose a set of considerations, agreements and opinions that "work for me", and that define and determine a DIFFERENT experience of reality. Changing sets of considerations and beliefs can be sort of like changing sets of glasses. As they change, your perceptions and expereinces change.
See, since considerations, agreements, attitudes and opinions do minimally "greatly color" ones experiences of reality, it behooves one to become aware of this mechanism, and also to adjust ones own set of considerations, agreements, attitudes and opinions so that the "new pattern" results in a "more desirable, peaceful, or better" experience of all-that-is for you (for whatever THAT means for you at this moment). To add complexity to the mix, it is also true that these personal considerations, agreements, attitudes and opinions are always CHANGING!
Any experience of reality is relative. The only experience free of that restraint is the pure experience of awareness itself, where awareness is the only object of perception and experience. But otherwise, just as with Einstein's Theory of Relativity, ANY experience of some aspect of the Universe is WHOLLY DETERMINED by the (mental/spiritual) STATE OF THE OBSERVER (in this case "you"). When Einstein was asked about, "well then what is objectively real?", he answered that as far as ANY OBSERVER (conscious entity) is concerned, there can be no such thing, because any finite experience of the Universe is patterned after and determined by the STATE OF THE OBSERVER. The same is quite true for consciousness.
This whole "psychology of consciousness" has not been much studied in the west, and is not viewed as having much value or importance in the modern world of consumerism, capitalism and materialsim (not that it has been ever valued much by ANY earlier versions of civilization and/or societies). Also, the main organized religions find such studies a great threat, because a true psychology of consciousness would "see through" and often act to tear apart "beliefs". That is partially why some versions of Christianity and Islam have such negative attitudes towards all things "New Age".