Is Mike Rinder a Trusted Source of Inside Information for Aussie Exes?

[Mark A. Baker]

Why do we always have to pay for your not lurking enough?

Mark A. Baker

 

[Infinite]

Why do we always have to pay for your not lurking enough?

Link please.

 

[Emma]

Link please.

I'm sure with your google-fu you can find them yourself. Try.

 

[scooter]

I'm sure with your google-fu you can find them yourself. Try.

Hint: the last firefight over this issue was about Mike Laws - suggest you start with that thread.

 

[scooter]

Don't misunderstand me. I very much appreciate Ned Kelley's contribution here. It is so much better than smackdown invalidations of any discussion of this sort that we have been stuck with here on ESMB for far too long.

'lanzo maybe I don't understand your definition of a discussion.

Seems to me more like you were running a "truth at any cost" campaign to extract as much info about Aussie ops as you could. All to support your hypothesis that Mike Rinder was somehow running us Aussies now.

Was I wrong in my assumption?

 

[Infinite]

Hint: the last firefight over this issue was about Mike Laws - suggest you start with that thread.

Is that the one where Mike Laws said I was OSAOSAOSA?

But, yeah, I geddit now. Silly me. The "X" Cherished was referring to was to denote anyone who has come under suspicion. I see now why the word "evidence" was in quotes.

 

[Emma]

Is that the one where Mike Laws said I was OSAOSAOSA?

It could be, but it might have been the one where Zinj said Mike Laws was OSAOSAOSA. Not sure. Or it could have been the one where Zinj said Mike & Marty are OSAOSAOSA. Or it could be the one where Zinj said that ESMB was OSAOSAOSA. You'll just have to have a look yourself.

 

[Alanzo]

'lanzo maybe I don't understand your definition of a discussion.

Seems to me more like you were running a "truth at any cost" campaign to extract as much info about Aussie ops as you could. All to support your hypothesis that Mike Rinder was somehow running us Aussies now.

Was I wrong in my assumption?

Yes.

 

[Infinite]

It could be, but it might have been the one where Zinj said Mike Laws was OSAOSAOSA. Not sure. Or it could have been the one where Zinj said Mike & Marty are OSAOSAOSA. Or it could be the one where Zinj said that ESMB was OSAOSAOSA. You'll just have to have a look yourself.

Heh!! Dear ole Zinj - ESMB's universal Third Party ; )

 

[Free to shine]

Heh!! Dear ole Zinj - ESMB's universal Third Party ; )

You don't understand Third Party.

And the allegations are all written here to read.

 

[Infinite]

You don't understand Third Party.

And the allegations are all written here to read.

Probably not.

Yes, Zinj was quite open in discussing his theories but now that he's pretty much long gone, his name keeps popping up as being a source of dissent and confusion. It was just joke anyway, feeble, I know, but I'm trying to get better.

 

[Emma]

Probably not.

Yes, Zinj was quite open in discussing his theories but now that he's pretty much long gone, his name keeps popping up as being a source of dissent and confusion. It was just joke anyway, feeble, I know, but I'm trying to get better.

Yep - dissent, confusion, division, conspiracy theories, pitting folks against folks. He's been quite good at that for years.

 

[TheSneakster]

Yes, Zinj was quite open in discussing his theories but now that he's pretty much long gone, his name keeps popping up as being a source of dissent and confusion.

I strongly suspect that as long has he has Alanzo to post on his behalf, he's not gone yet.

 

[Outethicsofficer]

As long has he has Alanzo to post on his behalf, he's certainly not gone yet.

Dox on this Mr Sneakster please.

James

 

[TheSneakster]

As long has he has Alanzo to post on his behalf, he's certainly not gone yet.

Dox on this Mr Sneakster please.

James

Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot to add "I strongly suspect that..." before the rest of that sentence.

 

[Outethicsofficer]

Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot to add "I strongly suspect that..." before the rest of that sentence.

All right then
Thanks
James

 

[Infinite]

As long has he has Alanzo to post on his behalf, he's certainly not gone yet.

Is that because you suspect Alanzo can't think for himself or gather information to reach his own conclusions?

 

[Emma]

Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think anybody suggested that Amy Scobee, Marc Headley or Jeff Hawkins were part of a Church of Scientology plot. David Miscavige's name has been "trashed" for years now. In 2005 in particular, stories of David Miscavige's beatings started to come out from multiple sources. When the St. Petersburg Time's Truth Rundown came out, there were already multiple credible accounts, from named individuals of David Miscavige's beatings.

You're right Ray. My post wasn't well written.

Although none of these books were written by Rathbun, the authors have all pretty much been claimed by Rathbun as either "independents" or buddies. Rathbun wrote the forward to the Blown for Good book IIRC. I think if M&M were an OSA op sent by DM, I'm not sure this would be the case.

This might be dumb logic and I still can't word exactly what I'm thinking. Too much red wine over the weekend maybe

 

[TheSneakster]

I strongly suspect that as long has he has Alanzo to post on his behalf, he's not gone yet.

Is that because you suspect Alanzo can't think for himself or gather information to reach his own conclusions?

Blip, I can't tell whether you are trying to bait me into saying something disparaging about Alan or just misrepresenting yourself as able to read my thoughts (which you aren't).

 

[Infinite]

Blip, I can't tell whether you are trying to bait me into saying something disparaging about Alan or just misrepresenting yourself as able to read my thoughts (which you aren't).

Its not that I have evil intentions, Sneaky, its just that I too have been accused of posting on Zinj's behalf. I was wondering what the thinking is behind that.