"Postulate off equals erasure" is an old Scientology Maxim. FZ Auditors are often using old Scientology concepts.
I haven't tried L. Kin's work, specifically, but when I did do "auditing", I never stopped until the "pc" voiced a "cognition" that showed he had spotted the "postulate" he had created during the incident that he was stuck in.
Is the postulate auditing Scientology process or is made by L.Kin?
What do you mean by "the postulate auditing"?
Paul
By "Postulate Auditing" I mean "Postulate Auditing". In L.Kin's third book you have chapter that is called "Postulate auditing" and goes step by step explaining that procedure. And my questions is: is there any Sci Process that is called "postulate auditing" also, or is just L.Kin's stuff.
Thanks for answering the question. I'm not familiar with that chapter of Ulrich's, so can't help.
Paul
NP Paul. Who is Ulrich? Is that real name of L.Kin?
I thought that he is anonimus...
Postulate Processing is an "old" Scientology process. Have you any Scn reference materials? You will find references to Postulate Processing in them.
It was dropped out sometime before 1965 or so as a process, although "postulate off" occurs as EP for Dn/ Scn processes.
HTH
chlng
The Tech Dictionary, the Red Volumes, the PDC tapes, Scn 8-8008.I was thinking that Postulate Auditing is in NED... Of which SCi materials do you speak?
Elijah
The Tech Dictionary, the Red Volumes, the PDC tapes, Scn 8-8008.
Getting the "postulate off" is a part of the full EP of a Dn inc. or chain.
It is also valid EP of any other process which restores " self determinism" to the PC, thereby allowing him to change his Postulates.
Most of the ex scn'ists on this board are not here to educate you.
Why are you not asking your questions on the FreeZone Boards?
chlng
Paul,
Thank you really, I was looking for the real name of L.Kin for months and now boom! -when I was not looking, suddenly it appears. It's something like your example when you found your ex-girls after your session..
Elijah
All Scientology auditing is "postulate auditing", the point being to get you to change your postulates.
Per C/S Series 6 the main point is to get charge off and fuck the significances. Or rather, the significances will then take care of themselves, eventually.
It's actually quite a big omission in Scientology.
Paul
Underneath the charge is the postulate and it is the postulate that is effecting the undesired condition, not the charge. I do not think that significance = postulate = significance in Scientology. Different animals.