Re: Isabella Cruise links above...
The
Hollywood Hiccups commentary was published/posted
May 28, 2013.
The
RadarOnline story was published
January 25, 2013....a story which is based directly on Tony Ortega's story dated
January 21, 2013.
These stories aren't new but the websites probably refreshed the pages since new scientology stories are currently popular/generating site traffic.
Re: Connor Cruise links above...
The
CelebDirtyLaundry commentary is new (March 18, 2014); and,
the
CelebTeenLaundry commentary is new (March 17, 2014)....
...but those 2 sites are only commenting on
WomensDayAustralia's actual interview with him.
In that actual interview, as commented upon by the 2 sites above, he stated that he and Nicole Kidman were "solid".
Nothing more, really.
Consider the timing...
The disconnection policy of Co$ has been getting a TON of media coverage these last 8-10 weeks; and,
Connor Cruise doesn't regularly/routinely give interviews.
Many websites (
especially those with celebrity-centric content) refresh their pages when a subject heats up in the media.
Some websites (CelebLaundry, CelebTeenLaundry, etc.) exist only to comment upon the original content stories published by bloggers/sites.
These comment-only sites are, unintentionally, helping in two ways:
(1) perpetuation/refreshment of older stories keeps the issue(s) in the public eye; and,
(2) if the celebrity didn't deny the original story/article, the celebrity has another opportunity to deny it when the commenter-sites rehash the issue(s).
Ex.: Isabella Cruise didn't confirm or deny the original story in early 2013. Will she release a statement re: Co$ now? :confused2:
We all want to see Cruise family members to leave Co$.
It'd be terrific, too, if they left publicly.
The info in the links provided doesn't
yet confirm any of them have left Co$.
But we're still free to hope it comes true soon -- for the Cruise family and for
all similarly-situated families.
JB