At the APIS site (where you're commended for your P.R. work Terril), there's this site page stating that all members believe 100% in KSW as written by El Con. No deviation per standard tek. Yet here you are in a video, at about 9:30 to 9:42, you state that Xenu is a metaphor. Rhetorically speaking, is that standard tek or P.R. to satisfy your interviewer? What you're doing is very similar to Marty's dissemination drill, curry favor by dismissing the true b.s. that's in $cientology so it's "acceptable" to the public. Franky, you remind me of an Hubbardian ambulance chaser with a twist.
ambulance chaser redefined (noun) slang - a Non-Cof$ $cientologist who seeks to mislead the public and is ever mindful of finding fresh victims to recruit from the Cof$ into a continued state of mind fuck.
I was kicked off IFA the forerunner of APIS some time ago. I've not looked at the APIS site I don't think and am suprised they wish to recommend me. Maybe your looking at an old URL?
I'm pointing out your dessim drill on the video is misleading, KSW vs Zenu is a "metaphor". Contrariness is standard $cio fare. The link to the KSW ref works just fine and what you P.R. to get people to stay in $cio or join is just wrong. Try the truth, El Con made it all up to make money and control people for his own fiendish pleasure. Bet your efforts wouldn't be as good if you said that, huh.