What's new

John Travolta sued in federal court for sexual matter..

BunnySkull

Silver Meritorious Patron
One thing that some seem to think is far fetched, but I do not is the CoS providing Kelly as a beard for John.

I don't know if many of you know the timeline of event leading up to their "blessed union." in 1991 it was leaked that the National Enquirer was coming out with a big story and interview with JT's ex-boyfriend. This was a man he lived with for approximately 4 years, in the late 70's / early 80's, and was seen with openly at many public places. JT didn't make any effort to conceal this relationship at the time and quite a few posters here have mentioned remembering JT being quite open with his sexuality during this time and in his career slumping years. There were many witnesses to their long term relationship and the guy was quite credible.

So this was going to be a pretty big story even if JT wasn't the mega star he used to be he was trying for a come back and this might kill the small comeback he made with the talking baby movie the previous year. The same week the story was due to hit newsstand -wham - John marries fellow Scio Kelly Preston. The story ran but the marriage really helped the public dismiss it as tabloid fodder. (This was the early 90's a more naive time for the public knowledge of closeted and gay celebs.)

As far as I know there was no connection to Kelly and John, besides the cult, until right around the marriage. No rumors of their dating or being seen out together. I have always though Kelly was approached by the cult, she was a struggling actress who's biggest claim to fame was being shot by Charlie Sheen, to marry JT as a way of boosting and helping both of their careers. Sell it as CoS power couple bullshit.

She is told to marry JT for the good of the cult's PR by protecting (at that time) it's biggest celeb. Besides it was a good deal for her, it made her instantly wealthy, greatly increased her name recognition, helped her get movie rules and by all accounts JT is a nice guy so maybe it worked well as a mostly platonic relationship that allowed both of them to have the children they wanted.

I have always assumed it was an arrangement put together by the cult and one of the reasons (other than PC folder blackmail) JT is beholden to the cult and will stay in the fold. One big reason the cult would have selected Kelly was her being a hardcore, dedicated member who would be loyal to the cult before JT. If my theory is correct I'm sure she reports on JT to the cult. (similar to how Tom Cruise SO staff kept DM posted on his every utterance or move.)

If you think the above is far fetched just remember the crazy shit DM did to find Tom Cruise a bride. If you will recall the first batch of candidates all came from the cult. Only after an exhaustive review and try out of all Scio babes didn't pan out were they then forced to look outside the cult. It was thought if since they couldn't find him a current Scio devotees they would just make sure his new wog squeeze would become a member, before getting married. They sure as hell did too, the cult goons and handlers were on Katie like white on rice. I don't think she was out of Jessica Feshbach's sight until the marriage, with Jess creeping out reporters by actually even inserting herself and answering questions for Katie during interviews.
 

Smurf

Gold Meritorious SP
The defense attorney is now providing a PR rationale for dumping his client.

"Okorocha said Friday that the date-challenged Doe is now looking for a new lawyer. “They have completely different issues and needs, and one lawyer can’t possibly do both cases,” Okorocha told the Daily News.

Evidently, John Doe's "proof" is that he, allegedly, passed a lie detector test administered by the National Enquirer. (?)

http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/j...ed-sexual-assault-man-steps-article-1.1076518
 

NoName

A Girl Has No Name
Evidently, John Doe's "proof" is that he, allegedly, passed a lie detector test administered by the National Enquirer. (?)

Is that even admissible in civil cases in California?

Maybe Dr. DUI needs to read up on Frye and Daubert, and how that ends up applying to lie detector tests in most places.

:eyeroll:
 

Smurf

Gold Meritorious SP
Is that even admissible in civil cases in California?

Maybe Dr. DUI needs to read up on Frye and Daubert, and how that ends up applying to lie detector tests in most places.

Polygraph results are generally inadmissible for any purpose in criminal or civil cases, even if the parties agree.

There are a very few exceptions where certain classes of registered sex offenders could possibly face criminal or civil penalties for refusals or results of polygraphs they're required to submit to by statute, but those are special cases and not the norm.
 

Lulu Belle

Moonbat
I know I promised to stop. I lied. :p

As I predicted...people are starting to come forward.

http://www.nydailynews.co...ed=false#commentpostform

Staff at the swank Peninsula Hotel claimed John Travolta was banned after several creepy run-ins with the spa’s male employees.

But the temporary ban in the early 2000s was eventually lifted and the “Pulp Fiction” star was welcomed back, says a former staff member.

Travolta was banished to the Fifth Ave. hotel’s “no-thigh zone” after his inappropriate antics led to an insurrection, said Michael Caputo, a one-time Peninsula masseur.

“Travolta would always request a man for his massage, but after a while no one would take him because of his inappropriate behavior,” Caputo said.

“It got to the point where they couldn’t find any men to take him, and they had to ban him,” recalled the masseur known as Magic Mike, who claimed he worked at the Peninsula from 1992-2008.

Travolta’s stay on the blacklist was about three years, and followed a complaint to the hotel’s bosses, said Caputo — who boasted his past clients include Ricky Martin and Jennifer Lopez.

The masseur said the sanction against the former “Sweathog” occurred roughly a decade ago.

Hotel officials didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Travolta’s attorney, Marty Singer, dismissed the allegation as complete nonsense — noting that his client was at the hotel’s famous rooftop spa as recently as six months ago.

“If he was banned, do you think he’d ever go back?” Singer asked.
“He’s never been banned, I guarantee you. . . . The hotel never told John he was banned, and John never acted improperly.”

Caputo, 55, said male staffers complained about Travolta removing his towel, grinding against the massage table and lifting his butt in the air.

“These are signs to a massage therapist that he was trying to see how much he could get away with,” said Caputo. “They went to management.”

The accusation is the latest blow to the married action star’s public persona, coming after a cruise ship worker and two other masseurs — one in Atlanta, the other in California — recounted similar sexual tales.

Caputo said he believed the two masseurs’ stories “150%. . . . I have no doubts in my mind.”

The former Peninsula masseur, who now makes $100 an hour working out of his Queens home, said he decided to come forward after hearing the allegations about previous massage misconduct.

“I just don’t want the licensed massage therapists to be thrown under the bus,” he said.


“So now the tables are turned because now Travolta has the money and can hire the best lawyers.”

But Singer offered another explanation for Caputo’s charges: The masseur is likely a “disgruntled employee” looking for publicity.

Caputo denied Singer’s suggestion. “That’s laughable. I'm not disgruntled,” he said. “I had a great overall experience as an employee.”

The Peninsula spa, replete with candles, flower petals and fresh fruit, promises visitors “a journey of deep relaxation and discovery . . . the ultimate urban escape.”
 

NoName

A Girl Has No Name
Polygraph results are generally inadmissible for any purpose in criminal or civil cases, even if the parties agree.

There are a very few exceptions where certain classes of registered sex offenders could possibly face criminal or civil penalties for refusals or results of polygraphs they're required to submit to by statute, but those are special cases and not the norm.

That's basically the evidentiary standard I know, but I aint never tried a case in CA so I wanted to make sure before I stuck my foot in my mouth.

Polygraph tends to have some evidentiary value in trial by media circus though. Nice one, Dr. DUI!
 

Smilla

Ordinary Human
Even though it might severely impact on his career, it might be the making of him as a person. Walking around pretending to be something you're not doesn't help much in building a happy life. If he were to come clean about his sexuality and part company with the Cult, I'm sure he would eventually find some genuine happiness. It just needs some courage.

He might need to cut down to maybe just two planes, but hey - he could scrape through :omg:

It's maybe a mistake to conclude that his marriage is a complete sham, because he is interested in men. For all we know, it might not be. There are such things as 'open marriages', I've heard. Oscar Wilde and his wife had a very loving relationship, and she knew all about his adventures/misadventures with men.

Assault is another matter, of course.

I believe we're all potentially bisexual anyway.

Isn't it amazing that we are here in the 21st centuary, this is still "the love which dare not speak it's name"?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt0lyIxxjgI&feature=related


 

Lulu Belle

Moonbat
It's maybe a mistake to conclude that his marriage is a complete sham, because he is interested in men. For all we know, it might not be.

You're right about that. From what I've read, he genuinely loves her and he would never leave her. And he loves his kids.
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
You're right about that. From what I've read, he genuinely loves her and he would never leave her. And he loves his kids.

And he thinks lovingly of her 10x a week while he's sucking a different guy's cock?

There's something wrong with this picture.

Paul
 

Smurf

Gold Meritorious SP
In the mid-90s when I was a witness in the lawsuit that Scientology brought against TIME Magazine & Steve Fishman's psych, Uwe Geertz, who was interviewed for the expose.

I was introduced to Paul Barresi, the bisexual porn star & masseur who first outed Travolta as gay when he sold his story to the National Enquirer fpr $100,000, had asked Graham Berry to represent him because Barresi was being threatened & hounded by OSA over the revelation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Barresi

Barresi was paid $100,000 by the National Enquirer, then paid $25,000 by Scientology to retract his claims to the National Enquirer. Barresi would later deny this, but refuse to comment about his relationship with his Scientology attorney, Lawrence Heller, whom he later fired.

I was interviewed for an article by a gay publication in 2000 about my being introduced to Paul Barresi & our friendship, in light of his claims that he & his family was being threatened by the Church of Scientology.

There were also his back-and-forth claims of being John's lover & the veracity of the claims made to the National Enquirer, which begged the question with many people, why the Enquirer would be willing to pay his $100,000 for his story, and the rumors that he was paid a large sum of money by Travolta to retract these claims.

*Barresi threatened to sue me for defamation for this article, but never got around to doing it.. "truth is a defense."
--------------------------------------------------------------

FAB Magazine, February 20, 2000 (*FAB ended publication in 2002)

PAUL BARRESI: STILL ANGRY AFTER ALL THESE YEARS

Outspoken, opinionated, rebel, snitch...or is he just misunderstood? Porn actor-director Paul Barresi is one angry man. With 52 films under his belt and a career that has endured 30 years, Barresi maintains a quirky love-hate relationship with the adult film industry, the gay community and Hollywood in general.

He's not your typical gay porn star. First of all - he's not gay. Secondly, he has probably achieved more mainstream recognition than most in the adult film industry, however, that probably has more to do with his JOHN TRAVOLTA connection than his creative endeavors.

After outing John Travolta in the National Enquirer in 1990, and receiving $100,000 for his efforts, life has never been the same for Barresi, an extremely complex man who seems to be constantly dealing with issues of acceptance.

On the one hand he complains about being discriminated against in the gay porn industry and asks why he is not accepted by his peers. On the other hand, however, he claims that most of the key players are scum bags, pedophiles and liars - which makes one wonder why he would even want to be a part of a group he seems to so intensively dislike.

While disparity seems like it should be his middle name, the truth of the matter is that Barresi, as shocking as this may seem to some, gives the impression of an extremely moral, ethical and principled fellow, more like your favorite gym teacher in high school than an adult film legend.

Those seeking an answer to the various contradictions in this man's turbulent career might gain some insight from Barresi's bio.

Born in 1948 in Lynn, Massachusetts, an industrial city north of Boston, Barresi was the second of four brothers. His father was a high-ranking civilian employee with the U.S. Navy, and Barresi, educated in Catholic schools, did his upmost to prove to his family that he was the best little boy in the world.

After graduating from high school, he secured a wrestling scholarship to the University of Maryland. Later, during the patriotic "America - Love It or Leave It" days of the Vietnam war, Barresi left college to join the Air Force.

After his discharge, it seems as though Barresi, like so many other young men who returned from the battlefields with a different perspective on life, decided to reach for his true dream. In 1972, ex-Air Force man and all-around macho guy Paul Barresi headed out to Los Angeles to become an actor. At first things seemed to be going his way. He landed a small role in the movie "The Wild
Party," starring Raquel Welch and James Coco, directed by James Ivory.

Like so many young actors in Hollywood, however, the mainstream roles didn't seem to be pouring in and Barresi did what he could to make a living.

In 1975, Barresi posed nude for Playgirl magazine and later on, during the late '70's and '80's, Barresi appeared in several adult films and videos, mostly straight, some gay.

"I have no hang-ups about straight, gay, bi, or anything else," says Barresi, who is now married with children. "When I was young and wild, just like alot of other straight boys, I would just about fuck anything," says Barresi, eloquently.

"Had it not been for AIDS," he explains, "bi-sexuality would be far more accepted today than it is. But the virus threw everybody in the closet. Everybody kept their own behavior in check because they didn't want to be branded. That's why alot of closet cases like John Travolta would only go out with straight men because he was so fearful of catching AIDS."

Speaking of Travolta, while Barresi clearly doesn't like talking about this episode in his past, (during our interview Barresi emphasizes forcefully, that he doesn't think that the subject should be delved into too deeply) there is no way one can write about the man without going into one of the most famous outing incidents of the decade.

It should be noted too, that Barresi came under heavy attack and threats by the Church of Scientology ~ where Travolta has been a decades-long member and trumpets its cause in public whenever the opportunity arises ~ and the church's cavalry of church attorneys and P.I.'s.

"It was not out of jealousy and it was not out of revenge," explains Barresi at first, but after a few seconds he recants. "Well maybe, there was some kind of a vendetta. Let me give it to you straight. In late 1983 when I was working with John Travolta on the film "Perfect," he promised me that I would be his new personal fitness trainer once his present trainer - Dan Isaacson - leaves.

"So, in 1990, I went to see John in Bel Air - he was staying in a hotel <Hotel Bel Air according to an earlier bio> and he introduced me to a gentleman that was in his suite and said, "This is my new trainer." I said, "Really? Nice to meet you," but that pissed me off.

"I was willing, however, to let it go because some years passed and maybe he'd forgotten the promise he made to me. But the straw that broke the camel's back was when I was leaving. He handed me the remnants of the complimentary hotel basket with partially eaten fruit inside and open packages. The only thing that was intact was the bottle of Dom Perignon champagne.

So I took the champagne and put it on the shelf in my apartment as a reminder of how demeaning and how cruel he was to me. To give me leftovers as if he was giving me a gift of some kind.

So, after that, I pondered the idea and I decided to tell the National Enquirer about who Travolta really is."

Note: Barresi's summation of his experience contradicts earlier statements made by him, some of which appeared on court record in 1992 in the Church of Scientology v. Fishman & Geertz case, a legal case defended by former attorney Graham Berry - who later acted as Barresi's attorney, after Barresi dropped his first attorney, Scientology lawyer Lawrence Heller.

First, Barresi has previously claimed in his bio and on court record that he met John Travolta in the shower room of a Beverly Hills gym and that they became "lovers".

Second, Barresi claims to have in his possession intimate letters sent to him by John while he was in Thailand and elsewhere on location and that each of these letters were signed "Much Love....John". (Scientologists are generally known to sign off on their letters with this or a similar reply.)

While Barresi strenuously objected last year to a post made by Garry Scarff defining Barresi & Travolta's former relationship as one of "fuck buddies", and threatened to sue Scarff for defamation, both Graham Berry, Garry Scarff and a large crowd of diners at Mark's Restaurant in West Hollywood were witness to Barresi boldly standing up from his chair and yelling to a packed crowd, "I fucked John Travolta in the ass and he loved it."

Third, though Barresi claims he bears no ill will towards Travolta, and claims to be sensitive to the subject of Travolta's letters to him, this has not stopped Barresi from exploring the idea of selling the letters to the highest bidder for "a quarter to half a million dollars, and asking Scarff for his assistance in doing so.

The hysterical reaction to the Enquirer's Travolta feature, in which Barresi revealed their sexual affair, was more, much more, than Barresi expected. In an interview with the gay mag 'The Guide' in 1998, Barresi claims that photocopies of the Enquirer article were sent anonymously, though earlier blaming Scientology agents, to the owners of his building, every one of his neighbors, every one of his fitness clients, his parents, and his brothers.

"It just about wrecked my life," Barresi told The Guide. "My whole world fell apart. My family disowned me. I lost all but two of my fitness clients. I was barred from almost every gym in town, and it cost me jobs." In the end, Travolta's attorney convinced Baressi to issue a retraction and an apology.

(This contradicts earlier sworn testimony by Barresi who claimed he was being harassed and threatened by Scientology's attorneys and thier chief security officer (and former disgraced LAPD officer) Eugene Ingram. Barresi also claimed his retraction came with a price. He claimed to have collected $25,000 from Scientology.>

"I was having a nervous breakdown," Barresi said. "I just wanted it to be over." However, Barresi told 'The Guide' that "when the dust settled, I regretted the retraction a lot more than I regretted the initial call to the Enquirer." (Barresi has claimed that although he made the profitable retraction, it never denied the sexual relationship Barresi had with Travolta).

That tumultuous episode seems to have left a lasting impression on the former wrestler, former Air Force man. While it seems as though Barresi felt that Travolta was getting what he deserved, he never expected the venomous reaction from the local gay community. Barresi, a man of his word, just wasn't ready to deal with Hollywood's "love-ya-mean-it" attitude.

Whether it has to do with his heterosexuality or the bad publicity from the Travolta affair, today, says Barresi, "not one gay-owned or run manufacturer of gay porn, despite my exceptional track record of having written, produced and directed over 52 successful gay videos to date, has hired me. They include All Worlds Video, Hollywood Sales, Odyssey, and Falcon Studios to name a few."

One of the reasons for the animosity between Barresi and the gay porn industry, revolves around, it seems, Barresi's moral code, which, according to him, is quite a few notches higher than the others.

Barresi expounds expansively on the low moral standards in the industry, mentioning names of directors and producers that, according to him, are guilty of pedophilia, prostitution and all around sleazy scum behavior.

Barresi is well-known for his egocentric arrogance and profane tirades, which was in true form in 1999 when he responded to a 'gay porn forum' where he was the focus of the discussion whether he was Travola's "fuck buddy."

Aside from that, Barresi also has a problem with the subject matter of some gay videos. "In the gay genre whenever you come up with a movie that suggests you're having sex with your son, or your father or relative, I mean the fucking video is a sell out, and the <gay porn> critics don't criticize it. But if you co-mingle some good straight man-to-man sex with scenes that have some
violence.... for example, I did a movie called "The Underboss' and I got so much fucking criticism for that. The righteous gay-porn world put that and me down, and it really pisses me off.... They don't condone that, but they condone and support incest. Now explain that to me, buddy."

Barresi fails to mention that theme of many of the gay porn videos in which he starred placed him as the daddy or authority figure engaging in sex with young men in the 18-20's crowd.

While one might think that Barresi might be better off in the world of straight porn, his ongoing work - writing and directing gay porn videos - is just one of the many complexities that seem to revolve around this unique adult video star. In the ebd, however, it seems that the real gripe is about acknowledgement, approval and acceptance.

"I'm talking to you because I want to set the record straight about these people," says Barresi. "Why should I be the only one that always gets criticized and ridiculed? I'm not recognized by my peers in the porn industry. I'm discriminated against - maybe because I live my life as a straight man." (It should be noted that 25% of those models that appear in gay porn videos claim, like Barresi, to be straight "gay-for-pay" persons.)

http://www.oocities.org/xenu2000/archive/FAB000220.htm

Barresi was an opportunist who later worked for P.I. Anthony Pellicano (now in prison). One of Pellicano's client notable client's was Bertram Fields, Tom Cruise's attorney.

http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?p=337640
 
polyamory4.jpgl


polyamory_is_right_shirt_white_on_dark_tshirt-p235740510509509637bh2ft_400.jpg


1312044227549.jpg



And he thinks lovingly of her 10x a week while he's sucking a different guy's cock?

There's something wrong with this picture.

Paul

sorry, I disagree. You are looking at things through a monogamous prism

try looking through a polyamorous prism

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/07/28/only-you-and-you-and-you.html
 

Veda

Sponsor
I don't care about Travolta's sexual orientation, but I don't like the way he uses Mafia/Scientology thug/lawyer tactics.
 

Smurf

Gold Meritorious SP
I don't care about Travolta's sexual orientation, but I don't like the way he uses Mafia/Scientology thug/lawyer tactics.

That's par for the course when a client is a highly visible & well-paid movie star. Movies don't get made unless there are investors financing it. Investors have a say on who is hired and not hired for a film, nowadays.

If the claims against Travolta rise to a point where people no longer pay to see JT in a movie, investors will not finance a film. Travolta's career is on the lines here.. he needs a pitbull attorney to defend him. It would be no different if it was any other A-list actor.
 

Lone Star

Crusader
I don't care about Travolta's sexual orientation, but I don't like the way he uses Mafia/Scientology thug/lawyer tactics.

Agreed, and I'll add that I don't like that he allowed, IMHO, the cult and his extremist wife to overrule his better judgement with regards to pursuing the proper help and treatment for his son Jett's autism.
 
Top