Vinaire
Sponsor
In continuation to the following post:
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=453235&postcount=29
OT Levels would not be needed if
(1) One did lower level strictly on the basis of LOOKING as described in KHTK materials.
(2) LOOKING means simply recognizing what comes up in the mind in response to the auditing question.
(3) This includes recognition of the fact that there is NO response when nothing comes up in the mind in response to the auditing question.
(4) There is likely to be no response when the question is not relevant to a person's case, or when that question has been considered before and not found to be relevant, or the person is simply not ready to tackle that question.
(5) Insistence by the auditor that there must be a response can trash the ability to LOOK big time. This is the most insidious type of invalidation.
(6) Procedures that involve repetitive questioning can be very invalidative.
(7) When there is no response to a question it does not necessarily follow that a person should now be F/Ning. Insistence that one should search for a response until one gets an F/N is taking a lot of chances. It is very dangerous. It generally leads to "chewing the bank."
(8) Running proceses to an EP is again an arbitrary. If the the preclear feels he is through with the process then he is through with the process. Forcing a proces to EP can be very invalidative even when one seem to get an "F/N". This is more like brainwashing. It is creating a dependence on the E-meter by invalidating the gut feeling of the preclear.
(9) Lower levels can be run in much less of a time with much greater wins if E-meter is replaced by LOOKING as covered in KHTK. No EP should be forced on a person. The person should determine his or her own EP.
(10) Processes are there to get a person to LOOK at his case from different viewpoints. There are millions of viewpoints to look at the same thing. No set of process will ever cover all the viewpoints. Processes are not important in themselves. It is person's LOOKING that is important.
(11) A Scientology process may give a person an idea of a certain viewpoint. A person may then look from that viewpoint and may devise his own variations of that viewpoint. He may do that even outside the session. Thus, he may get gains even outside the session. Idea that EP should be gotten within a session is an arbitrary.
(12) These arbitraries in Scientology as described above are creating all the troubles with auditing. They are tremendously increasing the auditing time and expense for the preclear.
(13) OT levels become totally unnecessary if these arbitraries are eliminated.
(14) What is confidential at OT levels are the vias that are being used. The "incidents" audited at OT levels are bogus. What works at OT levels is more permissive LOOKING. But not everybody gets it.
.
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=453235&postcount=29
OT Levels would not be needed if
(1) One did lower level strictly on the basis of LOOKING as described in KHTK materials.
(2) LOOKING means simply recognizing what comes up in the mind in response to the auditing question.
(3) This includes recognition of the fact that there is NO response when nothing comes up in the mind in response to the auditing question.
(4) There is likely to be no response when the question is not relevant to a person's case, or when that question has been considered before and not found to be relevant, or the person is simply not ready to tackle that question.
(5) Insistence by the auditor that there must be a response can trash the ability to LOOK big time. This is the most insidious type of invalidation.
(6) Procedures that involve repetitive questioning can be very invalidative.
(7) When there is no response to a question it does not necessarily follow that a person should now be F/Ning. Insistence that one should search for a response until one gets an F/N is taking a lot of chances. It is very dangerous. It generally leads to "chewing the bank."
(8) Running proceses to an EP is again an arbitrary. If the the preclear feels he is through with the process then he is through with the process. Forcing a proces to EP can be very invalidative even when one seem to get an "F/N". This is more like brainwashing. It is creating a dependence on the E-meter by invalidating the gut feeling of the preclear.
(9) Lower levels can be run in much less of a time with much greater wins if E-meter is replaced by LOOKING as covered in KHTK. No EP should be forced on a person. The person should determine his or her own EP.
(10) Processes are there to get a person to LOOK at his case from different viewpoints. There are millions of viewpoints to look at the same thing. No set of process will ever cover all the viewpoints. Processes are not important in themselves. It is person's LOOKING that is important.
(11) A Scientology process may give a person an idea of a certain viewpoint. A person may then look from that viewpoint and may devise his own variations of that viewpoint. He may do that even outside the session. Thus, he may get gains even outside the session. Idea that EP should be gotten within a session is an arbitrary.
(12) These arbitraries in Scientology as described above are creating all the troubles with auditing. They are tremendously increasing the auditing time and expense for the preclear.
(13) OT levels become totally unnecessary if these arbitraries are eliminated.
(14) What is confidential at OT levels are the vias that are being used. The "incidents" audited at OT levels are bogus. What works at OT levels is more permissive LOOKING. But not everybody gets it.
.
