snip-
Hitler decided Jewish science was worth nothing.
You following this idea re psycho therapy?
Excerpt from a 28 March 2010 post by Terril Park:
"You often claim that I and others use PR.
"That scientologists are not able to discern anything.
"You here blatently use black PR.
"You describe the creed as 'sordid insincerity', 'Phony'.
"As PR cover for its 'religion angle'.
"That it's a bad thing leading others 'up the Scientology Bridge'.
"
So you don't subscribe to human rights?
"The Creed expresses many points re
human rights.
"
We could assume here that you and human rights are distant."
Some background:
Around 1971, after surveying public opinion, Hubbard switched from mainly calling his enemies "communists" to mainly calling them "Nazis"; these days, "haters" and "bigots" are amongst those "buttons" judged most effective, but Nazi is still used.
L. Ron Hubbard explains how to use propaganda (to push the "hate" and "love" "buttons" of "wogs") in 'Battle Tactics' of 16 February 1969:
"The only safe public opinion to head for is they love us and are in a frenzy of hate against the enemy, that means standard wartime propaganda is what one is doing... Know the mores of your public opinion, what they hate. That's the enemy. What they love. That's you."
And another piece of Scientology tech, from Hubbard's 'Black Propaganda' of 12 January 1972:
"The objective is to be identified as attackers of popularly considered evils This declassifies us from former labels. It reclassifies our attackers as evil people."
And from 'Ron's Journal 68', with references to the "human rights" button excerpted only. (A complete statement, featuring both buttons of psychiatry and human rights, was posted some time ago, and can be easily located):
"...And the general attack line is along the line of human rights; yes human rights...
"Now I'll give you a clue on how this is handled, somebody comes up to you he's hostile - he's hostile to Scientology and he says to you and he says na na na Scientology and you say why are you against human rights and uh and if you know anything about human rights like the universal declaration of human rights, United Nations - that sort of thing you know if you know something about this subject you just follow it right straight up - in other words you don't defend Scientology, you just attack along this line of human rights, you see...
"Tell him or her ...uh ...the hostile person the hostile press line uh...for instance a newspaper writes an article on how bad Scientology is - any Scientologist reading this should run right to that newspaper and demand: Why are you against human rights?...
"Whereas an attack on Scientology is actually an attack on human rights - anyone making an attack on Scientology is an attack on human rights...
"Each time Scientology is attacked, we build into society, if you do this, we'll build into society an actual stimulus response mechanism whereas an attack on Scientology is an attack on human rights."
You against Human Rights? You for Hitler? You against helping people?
