Very true Opter!
But, they also have to DISRESPECT it if their senior tells them to look at the "other" policy on "being willing to invade another's space" in order to help them, reg them & handle them. Not wanting to discuss something in auditing is, similarly, handled by using Prompters ("...have you thought of something that you think would make me think less of you?" etc.) or in perhaps by pulling withholds.
The policy on "HANDLING THE PUBLIC INDIVIDUAL" is crystal clear that the public is NOT allowed to decide anything, ever.
So, while what you say is perfectly true....there are other perfectly TRUE-ER policies. That is the trick of Scientology. It is all good things to all people--and never the cause of anything bad to anyone ever. It is a mirror of what you just said you like...or a reverse mirror of what you said you hate. It's always perfectly what it needs to be moment to moment.
The ever-changing colors of the Church of Chameleon-ology!
So which one (1) of the two (2) contrary policies do they HAVE TO respect the most?
The one that doesn't get them sent to the RPF, I would safely guess.
I totally agree with what you say, I just used point#8 to my own advantage.
In the "Hard Sell pack" it is written that they use hard sell on a person because they CARE for the person. What a lot of c..p.
Opter
Last edited: