eldritch cuckoo
brainslugged reptilian
On another thread, Scooter has made an interesting post ... as it indirectly inspired me to make this thread, I'll copy it here:
I'm wondering how much David Miscavige really gets to see, now that there is so much daily entheta. I'm not referring to the "threatening" leaks and scandals themselves, as he undoubtedly gets informed about each of these, - I'm but wondering about the 1000+ Underground Bunker comments daily, dozens to hundreds (?) of daily postings on ESMB,... All intentions for micro-managing Co$ aside, since David Miscavige certainly is a person who doesn't hesitate to punish the messenger, I wonder whether they increasingly talk down and gloss over that stuff in their reports...!
Imagine him as a totalitarian leader (I'm thinking of communistic Stalin and Mao now... but really you might take any dictator), who on the one hand demands of his goons to keep him informed about each birdshit - but who, on the other hand, gets into a homicidal rage about each bad news. People are only willingly to take so much, even in Co$. When there is a way to minimize the punishment, the hissyfits, the senseless and arduous orders "to make things go right" and the RPF-ing (whether they ever see him personally or not), then they will resort to "damage control", even when they have a bad conscience about it. That's a survival instinct. I can easily imagine even a very devouted Scientologist, who is close to David Miscavige, having little to no problem with doing so, - as even they might see that David Miscavige is kinda overreacting and going hysterical, and since they are not willingly and not daring (which I can understand) to , they can don nothing but one: telling themselves that it is the best for "the church" if he does get as little hissyfits and rages as possible. Gloss over things. Omitt things. Even with the Co$ mindset, it shouldn't be a crime to omitt stuff and to tell oneself that something simply isn't "relevant". If this person is the very person, e.g. one of them, who has to decide which things are relevant ... then they are only following their job description! To tell them that they are not doing it well, would be the job of their superior, but alas... --- In former times, potempkin villages may have been built and the harvest was heaped at the side of the road to satisfy the driving by leader. Co$ glosses over and distorts facts shamelessly in the flyers and magazines for their members. To which degree is the same done to David Miscavige, since chances are good that he never personally searches for information?
Personal informations and informations about planned pickets etc are always considered "relevant", I get that. OSA will collect them, even if meanwhile there are so many "enemies" that they won't ever do anything with much of it. But what about all the rest...?
I'm asking myself such maybe ridiculous questions as to whether David Miscavige gets to see all or some of the shoops that include David Miscavige's face, done by "Observer" and others, who post them on a nearly daily basis at the "Underground Bunker". Does he see any of HelluvaHoax' ESMB postings which are directly about David Miscavige? I can't think of how anybody could dare to collect and show these things to David Miscavige, whether personally or not! Does he ask, "are there shoops"? Does he even care?
I think that at this point in time, his either unspoken or shouted reaction about much of the online criticism is, "FUCK, I DON'T WANNA KNOW".
It is plain that since Co$ can't get new members, David Miscavige's main concern is to keep the whales donating, to keep the members donating - and under an impression that Co$ is expanding and "changing things". Nonetheless...
The answer to him, ever more often, might be something like that: "Well yes, there's some activity, as usual. Ofcourse they do "D&B". Well, meaningless stuff." And they are increasingly not giving details, and get away with it ... because he really doesn't want to know.
Adding to that: How much of the scientological conspiracy theories does David Miscavige believe (nowadays), if any? Does he think that all "joking & degrading" is instigated/paid by "the psychs", Marcabians, etc? Might that be his excuse to dismiss the details of it as meaningless and insignificant, even while he really is ever more interested in money and power than to "keep Co$ working"? :confused2:
In fact, some of David Miscavige's decisions about "counter measures" - the ones which don't even make sense in regards to keeping up some impression of activity for the whales - are so delusional and backfiring that I can't but think that partially, this might happen because he is, very, very disinformed and unknowing ... about what really happens on the internet. As a narcissist he's undoubtedly delusional about the effectivity of his measures (regarding Scilons and/or the rest of the world), but I bet that's not all to it, that's not the whole explanation.
In any case I personally think that David Miscavige sees very little of the original contents. It is likely that, because he demanded this, he gets to read some lines that are directly about him, but then these information snippets will be excerpts from what the more famous whistleblowers are writing/saying. Again, this doesn't refer to any stuff that directly brings him into danger from the law. Undoubtedly he gets informed about all that. But otherwise ... I think he only gets reports, summaries. And that the people who are in charge of the final versions of these reports - and maybe even the people collecting materials and reporting to them - are increasingly emitting stuff, glossing over the "devastating" state of the public opinion about Co$, omitting whatever they can, in one of their numerous attempts of self protection, dismissing details as "not relevant for David Miscavige" that would bring him into a rage or send them to the RPF. Right, wrong? I'm just pulling this out of my ass and go by intuition (as a never-in). Just my 2c...
Side note:
I consider the effect of this thread (and similar discussions), if in some form David Miscavige gets note of it, as a chaos bringing one, adding up to the given situation where hysterical hissyfits and increased stress and punishments make the situation increasingly unbearable and inspire people to "blow" ... and that the effect will in no way be that David Miscavige "learns" from it, or realizes how much duped he is.
Personally, I think the longer the Drunken Maggot manages to clutch the reins of "power" in His tiny hands, the better. I can't think of a better punishment for the Dwarf Malignant than to watch His "empire" crumble in front of His beady little peepers.
Can you imagine what's going through His thoroughly pickled head every night as He peruses the daily Interwebs summary and sees just how bad it's all going? EVERYTHING is happily gurgling down the toilet bowl in Planet $ciloontology right now.
AND, everything He does just accelerates the whole mess.
I suspect that large chunks will fall off the cult this year, bigger than we've ever seen. And poor little Slappy will be madly trying to hold them all in place - and failing.
For Deputy Malignant, that has to be the best punishment.
That, and the fact that "we" are all laughing at him.
I'm wondering how much David Miscavige really gets to see, now that there is so much daily entheta. I'm not referring to the "threatening" leaks and scandals themselves, as he undoubtedly gets informed about each of these, - I'm but wondering about the 1000+ Underground Bunker comments daily, dozens to hundreds (?) of daily postings on ESMB,... All intentions for micro-managing Co$ aside, since David Miscavige certainly is a person who doesn't hesitate to punish the messenger, I wonder whether they increasingly talk down and gloss over that stuff in their reports...!
Imagine him as a totalitarian leader (I'm thinking of communistic Stalin and Mao now... but really you might take any dictator), who on the one hand demands of his goons to keep him informed about each birdshit - but who, on the other hand, gets into a homicidal rage about each bad news. People are only willingly to take so much, even in Co$. When there is a way to minimize the punishment, the hissyfits, the senseless and arduous orders "to make things go right" and the RPF-ing (whether they ever see him personally or not), then they will resort to "damage control", even when they have a bad conscience about it. That's a survival instinct. I can easily imagine even a very devouted Scientologist, who is close to David Miscavige, having little to no problem with doing so, - as even they might see that David Miscavige is kinda overreacting and going hysterical, and since they are not willingly and not daring (which I can understand) to , they can don nothing but one: telling themselves that it is the best for "the church" if he does get as little hissyfits and rages as possible. Gloss over things. Omitt things. Even with the Co$ mindset, it shouldn't be a crime to omitt stuff and to tell oneself that something simply isn't "relevant". If this person is the very person, e.g. one of them, who has to decide which things are relevant ... then they are only following their job description! To tell them that they are not doing it well, would be the job of their superior, but alas... --- In former times, potempkin villages may have been built and the harvest was heaped at the side of the road to satisfy the driving by leader. Co$ glosses over and distorts facts shamelessly in the flyers and magazines for their members. To which degree is the same done to David Miscavige, since chances are good that he never personally searches for information?
Personal informations and informations about planned pickets etc are always considered "relevant", I get that. OSA will collect them, even if meanwhile there are so many "enemies" that they won't ever do anything with much of it. But what about all the rest...?
I'm asking myself such maybe ridiculous questions as to whether David Miscavige gets to see all or some of the shoops that include David Miscavige's face, done by "Observer" and others, who post them on a nearly daily basis at the "Underground Bunker". Does he see any of HelluvaHoax' ESMB postings which are directly about David Miscavige? I can't think of how anybody could dare to collect and show these things to David Miscavige, whether personally or not! Does he ask, "are there shoops"? Does he even care?
I think that at this point in time, his either unspoken or shouted reaction about much of the online criticism is, "FUCK, I DON'T WANNA KNOW".
It is plain that since Co$ can't get new members, David Miscavige's main concern is to keep the whales donating, to keep the members donating - and under an impression that Co$ is expanding and "changing things". Nonetheless...
The answer to him, ever more often, might be something like that: "Well yes, there's some activity, as usual. Ofcourse they do "D&B". Well, meaningless stuff." And they are increasingly not giving details, and get away with it ... because he really doesn't want to know.
Adding to that: How much of the scientological conspiracy theories does David Miscavige believe (nowadays), if any? Does he think that all "joking & degrading" is instigated/paid by "the psychs", Marcabians, etc? Might that be his excuse to dismiss the details of it as meaningless and insignificant, even while he really is ever more interested in money and power than to "keep Co$ working"? :confused2:
In fact, some of David Miscavige's decisions about "counter measures" - the ones which don't even make sense in regards to keeping up some impression of activity for the whales - are so delusional and backfiring that I can't but think that partially, this might happen because he is, very, very disinformed and unknowing ... about what really happens on the internet. As a narcissist he's undoubtedly delusional about the effectivity of his measures (regarding Scilons and/or the rest of the world), but I bet that's not all to it, that's not the whole explanation.
In any case I personally think that David Miscavige sees very little of the original contents. It is likely that, because he demanded this, he gets to read some lines that are directly about him, but then these information snippets will be excerpts from what the more famous whistleblowers are writing/saying. Again, this doesn't refer to any stuff that directly brings him into danger from the law. Undoubtedly he gets informed about all that. But otherwise ... I think he only gets reports, summaries. And that the people who are in charge of the final versions of these reports - and maybe even the people collecting materials and reporting to them - are increasingly emitting stuff, glossing over the "devastating" state of the public opinion about Co$, omitting whatever they can, in one of their numerous attempts of self protection, dismissing details as "not relevant for David Miscavige" that would bring him into a rage or send them to the RPF. Right, wrong? I'm just pulling this out of my ass and go by intuition (as a never-in). Just my 2c...
Side note:
I consider the effect of this thread (and similar discussions), if in some form David Miscavige gets note of it, as a chaos bringing one, adding up to the given situation where hysterical hissyfits and increased stress and punishments make the situation increasingly unbearable and inspire people to "blow" ... and that the effect will in no way be that David Miscavige "learns" from it, or realizes how much duped he is.
Last edited: