Reluctantly, here's a footnote:
It appears that you're referring to an event from August 1950, in Los Angeles, where Dianetics was "tested."
For the sake of historical accuracy, it should be noted that the woman involved was a student of Dianetics by the name of Sanya Bianca.
And since I'm writing this, I'll add that Ron Hubbard has a number of grandchildren, most are the sons or daughters of the three children - from his two prior marriages - that he disowned.
L. Ron Hubbard was a "public personality," and spread his tall-tale-saturated "biographical sketches" far and wide, and then established a kind of alter-ego in his "Church of Scientology" and other Scientology corporations, and if you look closely at the prime directive of the Church of Spiritual Technology (also Scientology), you'll see - strangely enough - that it has to do with the maintaining and protecting of the name and image - and "legend" - of L. Ron Hubbard.
Hubbard's "blueprint" for the Scientology "movement," that he called 'The Brainwashing Manual', also, 'The Textbook on Psychopolitics', is relevant, not only beacuse it remains, essentially, the 'blueprint' for official organized Scientology, but also because the effects of decades of its application, in official organized Scientology, are still rippling through society, and through the minds of those affected.
Information and analysis allows people a chance to understand this secretive and manipulative subject, and maybe even salvage and further develop what positives are to found within it.
I have no personal interest in Hubbard at this time.
Sorry I do not share interest in this history.
I am only interested with general practical information.
I don't belong in any other club.
I don't care to get into degradeing you or the past habits of other people.
There are many different rooms on this forum for entertainment.
If I dropped a statement in some hallway that interests you I'm glad.
Beyond that I have no interest in making apologies for who I am or what I think.
I'm sure you can find many people here who share your interest and goals.
If I'm not one of them that doesn't mean I will come to think less of myself no matter the challenges you place before me.
I wish you well.
We just are not on the same page and I like the chapter I am in.
If I offend you, you have the freedom to put me on your ignore list so you can wander here undisturbed.
For the record, I will put you on my ignore list so in the future whatever complaints you have against me will be for the benefit of other audience.
I feel great about myself, who I am, and what I know, and I will not apologize about that.
There are plenty of people here who find you very interesting and agree with you.
If I have violated the rules of this forum the owner will notify me.
To the best of my knowledge I have not stalked you, challenged your words, attacked or gone out of way in any capacity to have any exchange with you.
In fact, I have gone out of my way to entertain you.
In my heart of hearts, I feel you are on a mission to tear me down.
In all the history before you it has not been done yet.
I am an abolitionist by nature, my own freedom as first purpose.
I represent billions who came before me and refused to be erased.
Time is just objects moving through space.
I stand without scars scratched on my face.
The clawing and emoting an energy waste.
I stand because I occupy myself with building people up.
I would appreciate the same behavior in return.
It has nothing to do with Scientology.
It has to do with live and let live.
And it has to do with treating others as you would want to be treated yourself.
There is a lot of abuse under the umberella of Scientology.
That is an arena that is of no personal interest to me.