Ignoring the idiocy of even dreaming such changes would ever see the light of day, I see the following proposals:
1. The Legislature, Judicial and Executive should "be made to" agree on any law before it becomes the law of the land.
2. A government employee can be sued personally for his public acts should they prove unconstitutional.
3. Define in the Constitution criminality and insanity and deny these the right to vote or hold public office. Criminality = "violence against persons and property in the state." Insanity = "the inability to assume personal and social responsibility or to perfrom routine work."
4. One qualification of voting is knowledge of the Constitution and the penal codes.
5. "Grant no court rights" to either the habitual criminal or the insane, "thus letting police handle them without bogging your legal machinery."
6. Make broad use of the e-meter. (The details aren't given in this letter, but an issue called something like "E-meters Not Guns" [HCO Info Letter October 16, 1968 'E-Meters Replace Guns'] from the same time period gives the details, basically grabbing rioters and putting them on the cans to find out who recruited them even if they don't speak or want to disclose the info; then grabbing those named people and asking them the same questions; then very soon you get the guy(s) you want.)
-----
This is so unreal in that it assumes the powers-that-be are basically interested in the general welfare of the people. Since this is a false assumption, none of this will work out and isn't even worth discussing. Maybe on some other planet.
Paul
