Challenge
Silver Meritorious Patron
Mary
I have searched everywhere for an 'Ignore' button. I don't want to Ignore Thread", I want to 'Ignore Poster'.
How do I do it?
challenge
Mary
Same with you, Ray.
I have searched everywhere for an 'Ignore' button. I don't want to Ignore Thread", I want to 'Ignore Poster'.
How do I do it?
challenge
I have searched everywhere for an 'Ignore' button. I don't want to Ignore Thread", I want to 'Ignore Poster'.
How do I do it?
challenge
Yeah, thanks for the stern reminder, you mentioned this already: "Those who jump your shit, you will take it up with them." (paraphrased.) On the other hand, you just jump the "MANY MANY critics'" shit in such a vague way that none of them, whoever they are, will be able to take it up to you. I think I will stick to my way.
Just don't worry about it, Ray. Don't use terms like weasel words unless you want to piss the person off.
Challenge, thanks for requesting the button, will be very useful for us!
Well, if Marty feels he's the only one who really and truly understands- that's not good but it would give him something in common with MANY MANY critics who post on critical forums.
Just sayin'.
Nothing "ad hom" in there. No matter how often I read your post, and how often I read the definition of "weasel words," I see a match ("vague and ambiguous".)
…
I have searched everywhere for an 'Ignore' button. I don't want to Ignore Thread", I want to 'Ignore Poster'.
How do I do it? challenge
Go to that person's profile and there's a dropdown menu called something like user tools.
Great! Thanks, I know just when to apply this. Love Ya Mary, stay cool and use that button, you too Rhill. Too many good things happening, and too many really good posters to listen to.
At the risk of re-igniting this ‘disagreement’, I’d like to make this observation.
VC said:
Perhaps there is a suggestion of an unnecessary tautology there, but the meaning is clear and, IMHO, the statement is entirely justified.
Rhill said:
‘Weasel words’ are defined as: “words or statements that are intentionally ambiguous or misleading” (Concise OED) The key word is 'intentionally'. People can often be ambiguous or misleading. Normally this is through carelessness, not maliciousness.
Given this, I disagree with rhill’s assertion that VC’s original statement used ‘weasel words’ and I agree with VC’s interpretation of this being a personal attack.
If someone suggested that I was using ‘weasel words’ I would be rather offended as I associate this term with one of the lowest forms of life extant on this planet - the politician.
Axiom142
Any opinons on that?
I have searched everywhere for an 'Ignore' button. I don't want to Ignore Thread", I want to 'Ignore Poster'.
How do I do it?
challenge
At this point though, I'm not very much in favor of even yourself having the 'controls' on any kind of short-cut basis, such as autohypnosis or even 'affirmations'.
Zinj
Mine? If marty was *ever* a free operative and not a false flag, he and davey had MAD to protect them. Neither can be honest without both being dragged down into criminal prosecution.
But, in the meantime, I doubt that Marty was *ever* actually independent.
Zinj
I'd tend to agree with you but I don't know what you mean by the term MAD
I'm not sure, but it does fit Mutual Auto Destruction.