degraded being
Sponsor
For the record, Mr. Rathbun never said he didn't believe in BTs, he merely stated he did not believe they were "space aliens". Just because he may not believe the story of "X" doesn't mean he doesn't believe in the tech. Similarly, just because someone doesn't believe in the "immaculate conception" doesn't mean he would invalidate the words of Christ.
Most would agree that LRH was many things, but "stupid" was not one of them. I think he made up that story so that when the materials inevitably became public, people would ridicule the fairy tale rather cave in on the idea that they're infested with beings not unlike themselves, many of which aren't very nice.
"X" is new to the world. Exorcism is not. And as a concept, it is much more credible than many so called "facts" promulgated by some of the world's "legitimate" religions.
Way to go Mr. Rathbun. You held your ground against a sniveling little prick intent on luring you into his trap, and not once were you tricked into invalidating your own beliefs. Those who heard the interview differently might consider the possibility that they are blinded by their own biases in the same way they accuse Scientologists of being blinded by theirs.
And as for that radio host, I wonder how often he spends an entire hour ridiculing the "immaculate conception"? In the now infamous words of John Carmichael: "I smell pussy."
I could be wrong, but I believe he said he doesn't believe space aliens inhabit our bodies. Regardless, it's unfair to ridicule one's religious doctrine. Go ahead and ridicule the inquisition. Ridicule the RPF. Ridicule pedophile priests. Ridicule child neglect. But out of respect for our fellow man, let's not ridicule "walking on water" or "body thetans". Even to an anti-Scientologist (which I am not), it merely detracts from the more important things.
Can anyone tell me if the story of X, or any of its components, is really even required to run the processes? Is it required that one actually recall being aboard an earthbound DC-8 to exorcise a BT? Must one recall volcanos to EP on any process? It seems to me that, whether or not the story is true, it is highly irrelevant to properly "disabusing" oneself of an unwelcome being. Just curious.
OK, I've seen the 'ol "confusing Scn with science fiction" line enough to be pretty certain they're coached to say that. But would it be any better, in a practical sense, if they brushed it all off as "matters of faith" like all the "legitimate" religions do? Why should anyone be obligated to expose themselves to public ridicule?
Meanwhile, some twelve year old in Hollywood is giving lap dances for swigs of whiskey from her demented stepfather because her mother is too busy on the RPF to care. Oh, I'm sorry, did I interrupt something about Xenu?
Honest about what? Xenu? Wow. I could give a rat's ass if someone lies about Xenu. Um... maybe I just need to get my priorities straight.
I have never denied that the Xenu manuscript is authentic Scientology doctrine - it certainly looks and sounds like LRH. What I was referring to are the actual processes one runs on himself during OT3, and I am quite confident at this point that, yes, the Xenu narrative is inseparable from the actual auditing process. While that might be a bit "far out" for me personally, it certainly does no harm that others find value in it, and I remain of the opinion that it serves no useful purpose to mock people and their beliefs or condemn them for telling little white lies to avoid public ridicule. I am much more concerned with condemning the RPF, disconnection, and child neglect/forced abortions.
I previously referred to the villain as "X" out of respect for those who may be offended by public pronouncement of "Xenu". But I suppose it is a bit silly to do that, at least on ESMB where everyone already knows about it.
I never said I wasn't an Ex-Scientologist, I said I wasn't anti-Scientology, at least not insofar as the philosophy is concerned. Haven't been in an org for over 25 years, but I have much love for both Scientologists and ex-Scientologists. There seems to be commonality amongst us, and I think that is the fact that we all more or less consider our own spiritual growth an important, if not the most important, part of life. That's why we used to be Scientologists - it was part of that search for our true selves.
And I don't mean to be over assertive. The truth is, I know very little about the upper levels, so it's sometimes helpful to ask questions. I do, however, have a very keen understanding of the theory behind Dianetics, which seems to pervade the entire doctrine insofar as the concept of "running" incidents of pain and suffering. If not for that, I would never have joined the Sea Org.
Thank you for your response, ThisIsNotOK! Hope my reply makes my positions more clear.
Thank you TG1! This is also very helpful information. Maybe I should revise my opinion to: "I guess I'll find out if I ever do OT3", which is unlikely, but who knows what I might do with enough time and money on my hands! .
Nah. The lust for money and power motivates the pitfalls of Scn Inc. The story of Xenu is relatively harmless in my book. .
.....Umm....

