Part 10
"Evaluate the intentions and statistics of that group, and its creator, casting aside all bias and rumor"
I also decided to look at the Church of Scientology itself in an unbiased way, its main people, its activities, what good it was doing, what harm it was doing, not through rose-colored glasses, with a prohibition against all critical thoughts, but just at the actual results, statistics, and actions without bias. For the first time ever, I decided to do what anyone trying to honestly evaluate a subject comprehensively would have to do: look at data, pro and con, and use my own judgment and common sense if there were contradictory claims of truth or veracity, looking at actual evidence and corroboration, until It was possible to conclude what was most likely the true state of affairs. For the first time I was going to get more than just the Scientology side of the story. I was going to see what was on the Internet that I'd been told for years to not read or look at. Instead of taking Scn's word for it that everything there was a pack of horrible lies told by psychopaths and suppressive persons, I was going to review whatever evidence was there and come to my own conclusions. Of course this was completely forbidden, but I felt it was something I needed to do.
I started reading and continued link to link for 3 weeks 12-16 hours a day. I read accounts of people I personally had known to be very dedicated and well-intentioned Sea Org members, but who now were "out" and spilling the beans. I also focused on the accounts of many, many people who had either known well or worked very closely with Hubbard from the 30s through each decade up to his death, many of whose names I knew from them being mentioned in glowing terms by or given trusted senior positions by LRH himself . I read books such as Jon Atack's "A Piece of Blue Sky", affidavits from court cases, excerpts from other books and investigations into Scientology. And I compared the things that were revealed there to the explanations and stories of the same events as they had been described by LRH, by Church PR staff, and Church defenders.
A lot of my inquiry focused on Hubbard himself. With one or two exceptions, I found the stories of ex-Scientologists, ex-wives, one time close friends of Hubbard, even LRH's own previously undisclosed letters, writings, and diaries were credible and described a person of completely different behavior and motivations than the ones that had been presented to me and all other Scientologists. We had been taught to look at him as man's greatest friend and benefactor, as one of the greatest geniuses of all time. What really struck me is how many people over more than 50 years of his life who were at one time very close to him, including almost all of his family and top execs working directly under him, whom he turned on, denounced, and attacked. Either he was the worst judge of character ever, or he had a tendency to fall out with almost anyone who became close to him
The essence of LRH's character, modus operandi, motivations, veracity or lack thereof, products, habits, health, and psychological and spiritual functionality or disfunctionality is a large and complex subject that I have actively pondered for nearly 50 years. Since he is the source of almost every part of Scientology, it would appear that all evaluations of the worth and utility of the subject itself must start with him. My analysis during that first three weeks, amplified by exhaustive research in the 18 following years, led me to an assessment so starkly different from the story presented by LRH himself and Church PR operatives that the validity of Scientology itself as a religion or as a business selling anything worthwhile was completely discredited for me.
I have come to a number of conclusions after my analysis of Hubbard's behavior and life, some of which I will quickly summarize. I believe he was mentally and emotionally quite disturbed. From his teenage years, he was a chronic exaggerator and fabricator about his own experiences, exploits, and qualifications. He repeatedly utilized lies to gain advantages, rewards, and results that he couldn't get honestly, which in common and simple terms is called being a con man.
Despite decrying any kind of substance abuse and demonizing anyone who had a drug history, he was observed by many people for decades as late as the 70s drinking copious amounts of hard liquor and taking large quantities of illegally obtained prescription drugs.
He had a violent temper and was at times quite cruel, brutal, and vindictive. He strove to destroy utterly anyone whom he saw as a threat or detractor, and he decided eventually most people who were close to him were out to get him.
Despite presenting a public image as a family man and insisting on Scientologists avoiding any type of sexual impropriety, he was married 3 times, once bigamously, abandoned all his wives, had numerous adulterous affairs, had a reputation for seducing other mens' wives or girlfriends, took part in magical sexual rituals, and fathered 7 children, all of whom he eventually abandoned to a greater or lesser degree.
He was very motivated by money, was heard by numerous individuals to say in the late 40s that the best way to make a lot of it was to start a religion, and from the beginning of Dianetics to the end of his life went from a state of near-poverty to running a group worth somewhere around $200 million.
He cultivated an image of being cause over (senior to and able to control) matter, energy, space, and time and having OT abilities, yet he had bouts of depression, crying fits, smoked 5-6 packs a day of unfiltered cigarettes, had rotten teeth and foul breath, was obese, suffered a number of severe heart attacks, had accidents like the rest of us, died at 75 of a stroke, and was found at his autopsy to have an anti-psychotic drug in his body. In short, he was a disturbed but highly successful charlatan.
I know that I am only presenting conclusions, as opposed to detailing the evidence that convinced me of them. There are a number of exhaustively researched biographies as well as great quantities of official records, first hand accounts, his own writings etc. available online adequate to convince anyone with the time and constitution to review all of it. Many previously dedicated and fanatical Scios besides just myself spent a while reviewing the data there and departed the group forthwith, realizing quite simply that they had been lied to and duped.
Of course, some die-hard members characterize the mountains of damning evidence now available easily for anyone wanting to evaluate Hubbard as being 100% forgeries and lies concocted to smear the greatest man who has ever lived. But the group's near hysterical efforts to keep their own membership from reading or watching anything critics say or present as evidence of the true character, actions, and motivations of LRH speaks volumes to how persuasive is the data unearthed by 65 years of independent investigation and enquiry into his life.
I would suggest that any person contemplating getting involved in Scientology, or any friend or family member of a member, or just any person concerned with human rights, would find it worth some time better educating oneself before coming to a conclusion, as opposed to accepting the validity of the self-serving propaganda put out by Scientology.
By the end of my my first three week foray delving into the online world of Anti and Ex-Scientology, I had already returned all of my confidential OT materials to Flag, stating as I did so that I was going to cease auditing the level for the time being, I had enough information that i no longer had any interest in participating further in Scientology.