programmer_guy
True Ex-Scientologist
Chris Shelton talks briefly about the state of Clear (4:43 minutes)
Last edited:
I agree. The term "in session" simply means "interested in own case and willing to talk to the auditor". So it's like when you go to a job interview you need to be interested in getting the job and willing to talk to the interviewer. That's just common sense."With both OT 2 and OT 3, Hubbard is TELLING people, who are "in session," and thus in a light hypnotic state, the details (and it's very detailed) of very important (to their surviving or succumbing) events, that they have no ability to examine independently, thus requiring Hubbard to TELL them."
I dunno know Veda, but I'd probably state they were in a rhetoric state as opposed to a hypnotic state.
https://rhetoric.sdsu.edu/resources/what_is_rhetoric.htm
"Cherwitz and Hikins:
Rhetoric is the art of describing reality through language. Under this definition, the study of rhetoric becomes an effort to understand how humans, in various capacities and in a variety of situations, describe reality through language. To act rhetorically is to use language in asserting or seeming to assert claims about reality. At the heart of this definition is the assumption that what renders discourse potentially persuasive is that a rhetor (e.g. a speaker or writer) implicitly or explicitly sets forth claims that either differ from or cohere with views of reality held by audiences (e.g. a specific scholarly community, a reader of fiction, or an assembly of persons attending a political rally). Communication and Knowledge: An Investigation in Rhetorical Epistemology. 62."
I think that's what hubbard did to get us to get involved and believe. He altered our reality, or agreement.
just my humble opinion.
Brilliant! I've never heard or read anything here that so precisely mirrors my feelings about the state of clear and scientology auditing in general.Chris Shelton talks briefly about the state of Clear (4:43 minutes)
I already know the Hubbard definition that you're providing.I agree. The term "in session" simply means "interested in own case and willing to talk to the auditor". So it's like when you go to a job interview you need to be interested in getting the job and willing to talk to the interviewer. That's just common sense.
So to equate being "in session" with being in "a light hypnotic state" is a stretch of the imagination and especially so when one is talking about solo auditors who are running their own session complete with operating the e-meter and writing worksheets.
I've read the Brainwashing manual, it's just another fear tactic used by hubbard:Addendum post.
Quiz question: "What is the 'case' of someone doing OT 2 or OT 3?"
Here's a sampling of a typical implant description from OT 2, plus a smattering of introductory material by Hubbard:
"Never proceed past a non-reading item. To do so can be very deadly.......Many persons experience unreality at the start of [implant] GPM running; this leaves when you see the meter reads."...."They are implant incidents...Trillion, 20,095.Hot Cold.This is a pole with a split in it. The back split is hot, the front is cold. Two temperatures. Duration is 1 [and] 1/8th seconds...Dance Mob.Trillions, 18,992.This duration is 7/8 of a second. There is a pole that pulls one in. One is caught in the pole."And a little more:"230 trillions.This seeks to install...Implanter X... Target X," etc. [Shows diagram of implant], etc._____________A typical reaction to running these materials is amazement at having contacted previously inaccessible incidents from ages ago, and delight at having expected (and hoped for) e-meter responses.Those without the expected e-meter responses usually respond with dread and upset at their failure.Their "cases" must be reviewed, and actions taken to "set" them "up" them for the "level."It's an impressive P.T. Barnumesque ride.![]()
Is it a coincidence that the brainwashing valve in Scientology was turned to full ON (1965), around the same time that Hubbard started releasing these levels?
When it was first written, it was used as propaganda.I've read the Brainwashing manual, it's just another fear tactic used by hubbard:
https://www.midlandisd.net/cms/lib01/TX01000898/Centricity/Domain/129/MILLER RHETORICAL.pdf
Hubbard wrote a book called "fear".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_(Hubbard_novella)
Kids playing the fake navy with fake costumes, commanding adults in a pseudo planetary operation to salvage earht in danger from intergallaxic evil Commander Xenu. In the back, the enormous photograph of the megalomaniac guru playing the kid naval army commander; Commander Hubbard, who had the kids to sign a billion years contract of slave working, in a lunatic paranoid psycho drama....Although it is true that, around that time (mid/late 1960s), Hubbard had put into application a big additional chunk of the ideas and methods from his 1955 "Russian" manual.
![]()
Pretty much the situation though!I wonder if this "aura" thing of OTs and other higher up scios was a thing of " I know what you don't know and now I'm better than you " manifesting itself.
Strutting around like some doggy doo on steroids.
People who have a puffed up sense of self can often give off an air that makes people look up to them.
Perhaps?
Ouffffffffffffffby Hubbard:
Duration is 1 [and] 1/8th seconds...Dance Mob.Trillions, 18,992.This duration is 7/8 of a second. There is a pole that pulls one in. One is caught in the pole."
Quiz question: "What is the 'case' of someone doing OT 2 or OT 3?" (snip)
A typical reaction to running these materials is amazement at having contacted previously inaccessible incidents from ages ago, and delight at having expected (and hoped for) e-meter responses.Those without the expected e-meter responses usually respond with dread and upset at their failure.Their "cases" must be reviewed, and actions taken to "set" them "up" them for the "level."It's an impressive P.T. Barnumesque ride.![]()
Is it a coincidence that the brainwashing valve in Scientology was turned to full ON (1965), around the same time that Hubbard started releasing these levels?
Ooohhh!But who said it was a game ????
Only Dr Hubbard said so...
(snip)
Isn't a game something we may or may not play..for fun????
And isn't Life is a divine mystical great plan in which we was gifted to be a part of, for a brief time????