OSA Operatives: How-to Guide

[Nurse Pinch]

Thanks for that.

I found the document entitled "B1 Drills" particularly interesting, which include drills on "Spreading Rumours", "Third Partying", "Creating effects" (by adopting various guises) and "Creating incidents".

How come that when dealing with their "enemies" scientologists do the opposite of what their tech says and find it quite justifiable to be "low-toned" and "suppressive" ?

Excellent. Another example of Scientology's hypocrisy.

Pinchy.

 

[Panda Termint]

Thanks for that.

I found the document entitled "B1 Drills" particularly interesting, which include drills on "Spreading Rumours", "Third Partying", "Creating effects" (by adopting various guises) and "Creating incidents".

How come that when dealing with their "enemies" scientologists do the opposite of what their tech says and find it quite justifiable to be "low-toned" and "suppressive" ?

Excellent. Another example of Scientology's hypocrisy.

Pinchy.

Are you kidding? The whole edifice that is the CofS (including the Bridge To Total Freedom) was built upon these simple actions.
It's only hypocrisy if you pretend otherwise... oh, wait a minute!
Carry on!

 

[byte301]

Thanks for that.

I found the document entitled "B1 Drills" particularly interesting, which include drills on "Spreading Rumours", "Third Partying", "Creating effects" (by adopting various guises) and "Creating incidents".

Interesting how these are the same techniques applied by the anon in their fight for "freedom of speech" and against scientology.

Well, Anonymous has never claimed it was the most ethical group on the planet. And you know why they adopt "various guises"...not to infiltrate but to protect their identities.

The only incidences they create these days are protests. The scilons are much better at creating faux effects.

The 3rd partying is true. They 3rd party co$ like crazy. But I prefer to call it telling the truth, an ability the co$ doesn't seem to have.

 

[Martini]

The 3rd partying is true. They 3rd party co$ like crazy. But I prefer to call it telling the truth, an ability the co$ doesn't seem to have.

Anonymous is the motivator for Scientology's overts. Karma for all the 3rd Partying they have done over the years. It's all come back on them, and it's killing them, slowly, but surely.

 

[byte301]

Anonymous is the motivator for Scientology's overts. Karma for all the 3rd Partying they have done over the years. It's all come back on them, and it's killing them, slowly, but surely.

Yes, they pulled them in. lol And they keep pulling them in. It makes me laugh.

 

[Lovesnightsky]

Yes, they pulled them in. lol And they keep pulling them in. It makes me laugh.

Oh, haven't you heard? Only individuals "pull in" entheta and SPs. The CoF$ pull it in because they are upstat and thriving!


Some people never learn.

 

[byte301]

Oh, haven't you heard? Only individuals "pull in" entheta and SPs. The CoF$ pull it in because they are upstat and thriving!


Some people never learn.

Is that the garbage they are spreading these days? LOL They are so dense.
One of the handlers at Big Blue was telling the protesters that they were afraid of Co$ and that they didn't want people to get free because they knew Scientology works so that's why they were protesting.

Yeah, right, you brainwashed dimwit. LOL It was the same guy that got in WBM's face that time with another scilon yelling, "What are your crimes?" He's still in and still being an asshat!

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

Well, maybe they weren't very good PIs...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/28/Sellers_pinkpanther7.jpg

Just read through the B1 documents. It provides a fascinating insight into the mindset of the CofS and also their patchy understanding of the outside world; ("Convince the bishop that the priest is really a rabbi"? Right.)

 

[Zander]

Thanks for that.

I found the document entitled "B1 Drills" particularly interesting, which include drills on "Spreading Rumours", "Third Partying", "Creating effects" (by adopting various guises) and "Creating incidents".

How come that when dealing with their "enemies" scientologists do the opposite of what their tech says and find it quite justifiable to be "low-toned" and "suppressive" ?

Thanks for that.

I found the document entitled "B1 Drills" particularly interesting, which include drills on "Spreading Rumours", "Third Partying", "Creating effects" (by adopting various guises) and "Creating incidents".

Interesting how these are the same techniques applied by the anon in their fight for "freedom of speech" and against scientology.

hi Alex, I think you may have got your quoting a little mixed up there, unless you meant to copy some of my words exactly!

You do point out a useful comparison here but I disagree that there is that much similarity.

"Adopting a guise" is not the same thing as simply putting on a mask, it is playing a role to such an extent that they are believed to be that person. Putting on a mask is merely concealing one's real identity rather than pretending to be another - no-one is expected to believe that an anon really is Guy Fawkes!

If someone were running this drill successfully it would be very hard to tell that they were not the person they claim to be.

 

[Zander]

Well, Anonymous has never claimed it was the most ethical group on the planet. And you know why they adopt "various guises"...not to infiltrate but to protect their identities.

The only incidences they create these days are protests. The scilons are much better at creating faux effects.

The 3rd partying is true. They 3rd party co$ like crazy. But I prefer to call it telling the truth, an ability the co$ doesn't seem to have.

Actually this is often forgotten (and I only realised it again myself recently when looking it up) but "3rd partying" by definition includes the spreading of false reports in order to create discord.

.

 

[alex]

hi Alex, I think you may have got your quoting a little mixed up there, unless you meant to copy some of my words exactly!

You do point out a useful comparison here but I disagree that there is that much similarity.

"Adopting a guise" is not the same thing as simply putting on a mask, it is playing a role to such an extent that they are believed to be that person. Putting on a mask is merely concealing one's real identity rather than pretending to be another - no-one is expected to believe that an anon really is Guy Fawkes!

If someone were running this drill successfully it would be very hard to tell that they were not the person they claim to be.

I meant to copy (some of) your words exactly. A form of humor called parody. Done in the interest of pointing out a certain dichotomy....a dance, and its partners....

 

[byte301]

Actually this is often forgotten (and I only realised it again myself recently when looking it up) but "3rd partying" by definition includes the spreading of false reports in order to create discord.

.

You're right. Thanks to the co$ we don't need to spread "false" rumors. The truth is damning enough.

 

[Tim Skog]

You're right. Thanks to the co$ we don't need to spread "false" rumors. The truth is damning enough.

^^^^^^

 

[klidov]

IF this story is true, then that was one PI who was totally shit at his job.

This story comes from my own backyard, and it just happens, I know PI's.

Martini's story is a lie. I will say it outright.

Either someone was pulling his leg (possible), or he made this up (probable).

I am not buying it, and I would advice others to be suspect of Martini.

 

[klidov]

This story comes from my own backyard, and it just happens, I know PI's through out the State of Florida, as well as local Law Enforcement. There are not so many PI's that they do not know "of" each other, nor know when a new PI is in town.

Martini's story is a lie. I will say it outright.

Either someone was pulling his leg (possible), or he made this up (probable).

I am not buying it, and I would advice others to be suspect of Martini.

See the corrections made to the original post. I find it so insulting when someone tries to decieve others. It is an insult to intelligence.

 

[klidov]

Sometimes they want you to know they're watching/following you, so you'll get "spooked" and go paranoid.

Lynn

Agreed. You are spot-on, Lynn!

 

[Martini]

This story comes from my own backyard, and it just happens, I know PI's.

Martini's story is a lie. I will say it outright.

Either someone was pulling his leg (possible), or he made this up (probable).

I am not buying it, and I would advice others to be suspect of Martini.

I just found this - it talks about the P.I.s. at that time. The LMT trust was right down the street from the Fort Harrison.

Whether I met them in the Lemon Tree is rather inconsequental - people can discard it or believe it, and it will make no difference.

The reality that the chruch hires p.i.s is perhaps more note-worthy.

In a side note the judge also criticized the presence of off-duty police officers that were hired by the Church of Scientology as security guards. Using police officers, private investigators and their own security staff, the Church of Scientology had kept the LMT and its staff under constant surveillance [Exh. No. 70].

http://www.holysmoke.org/mo/federal_complaint_ii_-_public-controversy-c.htm

 

[Martini]

Agreed. You are spot-on, Lynn!

Lynn is like Mulder on the X-Files. I love her speculations.

Lynn for President!

 

[Tim Skog]

well...........

 

[Panda Termint]

Tim, we all know CofS uses PIs, that's nothing surprising.
The old GO had a much different and more capable personel pool for these actions but they have always used PIs for certain things.