OSA Operatives: How-to Guide

Jachs

Gold Meritorious Patron
To me the documents are ubdoubtedly genuine. They're not a Manual as such but rather a collection of document seized in the FBI raids on US Churches. They were most probably in someone's Hat Pack (the Drills included would seem to indicate this).

It certainly reads as authentic USGO B1 ie. Bureau/Branch 1 of the Guardian Office = Intelligence Bureau/Branch (later renamed "Information" so it wouldn't scare the kiddies so much).

There is an actual Manual in the archives over on Xenu.net.

Cheers Panda
 

Jachs

Gold Meritorious Patron
OSA INT Stats

From BFG..OSAs Stats

At the end of each and every day, an OSA Daily Report is sent up to COB RTC.
This report is basically a summary of all of the legal and PR situations and handlings that are being dealt with by OSA. Current cases and legal proceedings.
Upcoming protests being planned, proposed handlings etc. No one makes any moves with Dave Miscavige either ordering it or approving it in these reports.

When local cops are brought in for security and rough up protesters, who was there when that happened, Dave Miscavige.

There is also a "Press Update" that has any and all Press that has appeared anywhere is the world on the Scilons.
They have a clipping service that does this for them. If there are press in areas other than the United States, these articles are translated and the translation is attached to the original printed article.
The press update goes to COB RTC, and a plethora of INT level Execs as well as the CO OSA INT and most of the goons listed on the above list.
Articles or Press are how OSA keeps stats. Each printed article is counted by column inches. Each audio or video article is counted as minutes. If the item is generally pro Scilon, than it is counted as a Positive inch or minute.If the item is negative and against Scilons, then it is counted as a negative minute or inch on the stats.



Additional Stats.
Legal Rudiments.
There are certain legal rudiments that must be in place for a Scilon hive to be considered following the law.
Any one of the 50 points listed out counts as a minus on the stats.

Legal Situations Found and Handled.
Scilon Rapes someone at the Org. This counts as a Legal Situation Found and counts on the stats as a minus.
It stays on the stats until it is "handled" and no longer a situation.

PR Situations Found and Handled .
Local Scilon stands in front of Subway sandwich shop and tells little girls they are not allowed in and must starve.
This is a Public Relations situation and must stay on the stats as a minus until it is handled.

OSA used to have LOT of staff. As long as the stats are down, people will keep getting busted until they go up again.
Dave will take every last person off post until there is no one left.


OSA's stats are the stats that LRH gave them. They cannot change them. As long as people are willing to talk about
Scilons and print articles about footbullets and other Scilon activity, OSA stats will be down.

Every time there is a flash raid or picket or group of anon on TV, some statistic at OSA just took a hit.

Printed articles or audio or video interviews all count. I am not sure how they count Internet items.
While they are certainly more volume than other items, I am not aware how OSA has decided to count them on the stats.

I do know this, Dave Miscavige is making them count them or there would be no C&D letters and videos being taken off.
They would not have PI's tracking down Anons. And they certainly would not be spending tons of money making anti anon DVDs and shooting dumb ass Scilon internet videos full time.

Someone at OSA has the job of finding any and all anti Scilon material on the Internet and trying to get rid of it. As long as it is out there, a stat at OSA is going down.

Google search results is a pet peeve of Dave Miscavige.
If it shows up on the first page and it is anti Scilon - Dave is not happy.
If the Pro Scilon stuff is not number one-ten, Dave is not happy.


Dave is not happy a lot.

As any Ex-Scilon will tell you, as long as the stats are going down, it is
headhunting time. Scilons believe that when stats are going down and don't
go back up, someone within the org is holding them down. Heads will
continue to roll until the stats go back up. That is what LRH said to do, get
rid of the SPs until the stats go back up!


This is why the orgs are empty. This is why you have 25,000 Ex Sea Org members.
This is why you have tons of ex-scilons and staff on thee forums lurking. They are here and there are reading and learning.
They are reading shit here and testing it out at the local org or Flag. They are asking more questions that have no good answers and they are asking for their money back. 2009 is on track to go on record for the most amount of refund requests in Scilon history! That was not an accident.

Scilons are leaving faster than they can sign new ones up. Scilons have seen their share of critics over the years.
They come and they go but most of them never stick around for long.
There are a few exceptions to this rule with the OG, but more or less the average Scilon does not see that many critics.
In the last year that has changed. You can't be involved with most orgs around the world without seeing a critic every few days if not hours. New Scilons will get on the interweb and find shit out. All Scilons will take longer, but Dave Miscavige has been pushing them to the edge and the protest and all the crap are just adding fuel to the fire that they have been burning themselves.

http://forums.whyweprotest.net/threads/who-is-who-in-osa-int.40257/
 

Royal Prince Xenu

Trust the Psi Corps.
Panda is this an OSA manual?
...
1. Order hundreds of dollars worth of liquor in Jones's name and have it delivered to his home to cause him trouble and make the liquor store owner dislike him.

This would be so funny, considering that I don't drink!

1. Poison him while he's asleep so he'll never start another attack.

Poison in the ear as per the Scottish Play?

1. Cleverly kidnap her and run reverse processes on her while implanting the phrase, "THE PSI CORPS IS YOUR FRIEND. TRUST THE CORPS."

4. Pay ten of her students to write dirty phrases about her on the schoolroom blackboard.

I thought kids did this sort of thing without being asked.

2. Connect him up to abortion end/or pornographic activities.

These days, who'ld notice?

Given the out-datedness of some of these actions, these would be pre-OSA, meaning Guardian Office docs.
 

Jachs

Gold Meritorious Patron
You never know where OSA is at any one time though , what OPs they're doing, disguises taken on , could be in your own house .....


crafty-homo-uses-disguises-to-get-his-cheap-thrills.jpg
 

SchwimmelPuckel

Genuine Meatball
Awesome bump!
From This thread: What would OSA's prioritites be in 2011?

Good posts here.

This war is far from over. The FBI case is inactive according to FBI statements unless someone has gotten it active in the last few weeks. M&M are hardly forthcoming about their involvement in exposing scn to the FBI but that is not surprising to any of us. To call anyone OSA is dangerous but to recognize when one is doing something that aids OSA is another thing. Not exposing Scn when one could is equally contributing to OSA's goals.

The history of the many warriors who went to bat against this cult paved the way for so much more being exposed but there was a price paid for that. History shows a battle was fought in the 80s and 90s and some fled to protect themselves from fairgame or from having been fairgamed - but who can blame them? CoS hired PIs like people hire a housecleaner; they sued everyone they could into bankrupcy or worse. They pitted people against one another by using OSA tactics. But many survived and continued on. Knowing the history of the exs is so vital, it amazes me when someone posts something they just found as if they had found a previously unheard of piece of information never read by anyone before.

But the point is that just because it's quiet does not mean OSA is not busy at work. Yes, Ferel, and IMHO, I believe that OSA's priorities in 2011 will be:

1) to continue to go after the few Anonymous antics to prove something was done illegally so they can use these to bolster their position with law enforcement agencies in attacking everything anonymous.

2) Continue to recruit the wavering few and have them make amends by helping to reel in lost members.

3) Continue to have certain 'handler' members try to stiffle the friendships of others with those who have left the flock, ie: via facebook

4) To continue to investigate anyone protesting, by taking photose, getting names, 'finding their crimes' or manufacturing them with the goal to be to try to shutter them into silence, using legal means if necessarily- ie: TROs.

5) To keep doing PR on the internet, in abundance.

Besides all the counter ads all over the media articles denouncing or exposing Scn we have some newer examples:

ie: The other day on AOL there was actually a THIS DAY IN SCIENTIOLOGY plug on front page news that, if clicked, took you to a slew of photo histories promoting Hubbard and the cult. That pissed me off. Certainly they got the idea from Ron Sharp's posting on ARS of his This Day in History collection of news from the past which he has painsakenly store and collected for years.

ie: n attacking the FZ, their use of "Ron's Org in Flag promo they have been flooding the mails with, after copyrighting the name so that the FZ group could not use it. They have done this to keep the sheep in the fold and make the term a Ron's Org theirs.

6) to continue to cause dissension between the various sectors of exs
by use of pawns and trolls. The goal being to slow the progress of people exposing it's crimes and activities.

7) Keep trying to cut communications so people won't be able to read about scn on the internet:

Keep flooding ARS and WWP with troll spammers. ARS is only a hint of what it was and the targets will be to do the same with other forums.

Keep sending in trolls to divert thread topics, cause a topic to end by nonsequitur comments, cause dissension and confuse readers. Keep encouraging illegal or non-scn related activities to try and stem the activities of those trying to work together on important exposing projects.

Keep trying to take down WWP by whatever means necessary whenever a story is about to hit the news or has come up unexpectedly.

Keep spreading rumors knowing that some will act upon them without inspection and therefore do the dirty work of OSA without even knowing they are doing so.

8) encouraging people to call some people OSA so they will not be listened to.

It would be nice if all the exs were on the same page about OSA's long term goals to stop all activities in the 'field'. The fact is, we are all enemies of OSA. The quiet and the loud ones, the protester, the Indy, the FZer, the average poster here and elsewhere. OSA loves complacency. They love ignorance, stupidity and rumor mongering. Their motto is that 'the price of freedom is constant alertness, constant willingness to fight back' . It would behoove some to think how OSA thinks and keep that in mind when reading and acting. Freedom from Scientology is the stake.

:yes:
 

Royal Prince Xenu

Trust the Psi Corps.
Awesome bump!

It would be nice if all the exs were on the same page about OSA's long term goals to stop all activities in the 'field'. The fact is, we are all enemies of OSA. The quiet and the loud ones, the protester, the Indy, the FZer, the average poster here and elsewhere. OSA loves complacency. They love ignorance, stupidity and rumor mongering. Their motto is that 'the price of freedom is constant alertness, constant willingness to fight back' . It would behoove some to think how OSA thinks and keep that in mind when reading and acting. Freedom from Scientology is the stake.

:yes:

You've re-raised a very valid point. This is the one tactic that we must keep in our own arsenal to keep OSA at bay.
 

SchwimmelPuckel

Genuine Meatball
Yup.. It's a very valid point.. Albeit it WAS AnonMary who raised it..

One thing I have said often, that I'm suspecting ye' all are bored stiff from hearing me say.. Is that ex-es and critics should never fight. Not for any reason.. Not even if the offending 'critic' is a suspected OSA flunky.

My reationale is that if OSA likes to third party us and make us fight.. Then the fight is their 'product' and if we fight we obviously give it to them.

If we never ever did fight, then OSA couldn't third party anything. And they'd stick out like a dogs balls if they tried.

Allright.. I do realize that this sounds like Walt Disney.. But hey!

I find the principle sound enough. I always become suspicious of someone attacking another critic.

:yes:
 

RogerB

Crusader
Yup.. It's a very valid point.. Albeit it WAS AnonMary who raised it..

One thing I have said often, that I'm suspecting ye' all are bored stiff from hearing me say.. Is that ex-es and critics should never fight. Not for any reason.. Not even if the offending 'critic' is a suspected OSA flunky.

My reationale is that if OSA likes to third party us and make us fight.. Then the fight is their 'product' and if we fight we obviously give it to them.

If we never ever did fight, then OSA couldn't third party anything. And they'd stick out like a dogs balls if they tried.

Allright.. I do realize that this sounds like Walt Disney.. But hey!

I find the principle sound enough. I always become suspicious of someone attacking another critic.

:yes:

:yes: Yes :thumbsup:

And rightly so. An attack is an attack, and it is destructive.

There are ways of questioning posts without destructive attacks.

R
 

Lurker5

Gold Meritorious Patron
Agree

Yup.. It's a very valid point.. Albeit it WAS AnonMary who raised it..

One thing I have said often, that I'm suspecting ye' all are bored stiff from hearing me say.. Is that ex-es and critics should never fight. Not for any reason.. Not even if the offending 'critic' is a suspected OSA flunky.

My reationale is that if OSA likes to third party us and make us fight.. Then the fight is their 'product' and if we fight we obviously give it to them.

If we never ever did fight, then OSA couldn't third party anything. And they'd stick out like a dogs balls if they tried.

Allright.. I do realize that this sounds like Walt Disney.. But hey!

I find the principle sound enough. I always become suspicious of someone attacking another critic.

:yes:

Agree :clap: :goodposting:
Sometimes though, I am guilty of critical remarks . . . :omg: :unsure:
:stone: :mirror:

I admit it, I am human. :yes:
 

Nicole

Silver Meritorious Patron
Yup.. It's a very valid point.. Albeit it WAS AnonMary who raised it..

One thing I have said often, that I'm suspecting ye' all are bored stiff from hearing me say.. Is that ex-es and critics should never fight. Not for any reason.. Not even if the offending 'critic' is a suspected OSA flunky.

My reationale is that if OSA likes to third party us and make us fight.. Then the fight is their 'product' and if we fight we obviously give it to them.

If we never ever did fight, then OSA couldn't third party anything. And they'd stick out like a dogs balls if they tried.

Allright.. I do realize that this sounds like Walt Disney.. But hey!

I find the principle sound enough. I always become suspicious of someone attacking another critic.

:yes:

Sometimes my problem is a little bit of paranoia. The problem is that OSA isn't obviously, they are unseen. They seem to be a critic. You get in contact or they contact you and you think it is a critic and it is OSA and I know that lots of people didn't trust me too.

OSA stays allive with this paranoia, especially in my head. :grouch:
I am not sure how I should work it out or how I should destroy this fear.:unsure:
May be you have an idea...:confused2:

But a Walt Disney World seems to be nice....:D
 

AnonyMary

Formerly Fooled - Finally Free
OSA Operatives: How-to Guide

Several times over the last few months I’ve mentioned OSA operations as they are applied to Critics of scientology. Each time I mention it I usually get replies that add up to bluster about how inept OSA is, rejections of my comments as paranoia or variations on the “I ain’t afraid of no stinkin’ OSA” type of comment.
I know for a fact that the current OSA is nowhere near as good at what they do as the GO of yesteryear was. They just don’t have the same calibre of personnel or the freedom of action and independence that the GO had.
Regardless, I still consider it a mistake of magnitude to underestimate them.
Many are familiar with the few publicly exposed operations such as "Snow White" and "Operation Freakout" but I wonder how many know about the multitude of successful secret operations run by the GO/OSA?
Believe me, the average scn’ist or Ex wouldn’t know a fraction of it.
On the board here at ESMB there are a number of ex-OSA/ex-GO staff and I thought it might be enlightening to some for these people to inform us of their personal experience, particularly as it relates to “handling” Critics.
I’m sure that the title of this thread will undoubtedly entice the wits (at least half of them) to chip in with repartee but, for the sake of making ESMB a safer place to refer newly-out or wavering scn’ists, I beg your restraint in this matter.

I’ll begin:
Intelligence operatives (GO Bureau 1) operated on the following plan in order to achieve their Valuable Final Product;

“PLANS: Generally to locate every source of opposition to Scientology and the control point of these sources and to reduce their power to ineffectiveness and/or take them over.”

“VALUABLE FINAL PRODUCT: Exterior enemies and attacks located and restrained and/or removed.”

I’ve previously detailed some of the statistics of B1 on another thread. All deal with getting people to shut up, cease attacking, get distracted, change sides, attack someone else, run away, hide etc. I’m sure you get the picture.

Here are examples of just a couple of capers run very successfully in the past, they’re not verbatim but are as close as I can recall AND they’re factual and were done to full success hundreds of times that I know of.
Firstly;
Attend any public meeting/forum/discussion that might possibly touch upon scn and successfully steer the talk away from anything negative about scn if it appears to be heading in this direction. (Positive talk about scn was the arena of PR).
I did this cycle many times and was always 100% effective at side-tracking anything about scn and steering the discussion onto designated enemies of scn.
The designated enemy depended on the nature of the forum, eg: if the forum was religious in nature the discussion might be steered onto psych-abuse, if it was mental-health in nature you might steer it to government or religion, if it was “community concern” in nature you would always be safe steering it to politicians/government etc.
According to my observation, this caper has been resurrected (if it ever went away) and is currently being run on internet message boards and chat rooms with great success. ESMB is no exception. The number of threads and “dangerous topics” derailed is quite spectacular from an OSA point of view and they must be justly proud of the success of their modern-day application of this particular program. It probably also accounts for the presence of a couple of notable scn’ists at the recent Melbourne forum about Kenja. (Ken Dyers, a principal of Kenja, had a scn background and so the discussion might have touched upon scn.)

Secondly;
One method of handling a target Critic.
Contact the target Critic by phone, pretending to be a fellow-critic. Agree with the person’s criticisms of scn and voice your own (*see note on “suitable criticisms” below).
Become more strident and whiney until you successfully annoy the person into refuting something you are saying.
Don’t stop, continue to whine using the reject-buttons (these are from a list written by LRH, buttons that cause people to reject what you’re saying) and refuse to stop criticising, don’t acknowledge or listen to anything the target says. If he/she refutes your data accuse him/her of supporting or being a scientologist.
Don’t stop; keep going until the person hangs up on you. (You may have to repeat this action if unsuccessful on first application.)
This one was imminently successful and, amazingly enough, shut down several high profile radio personalities and State politicians. They never again publicly criticised scn (major B1 points when you achieve this). I never had to call someone twice; they just couldn’t tolerate the idea of thinking of themselves as somehow associated with or anything like this brain-dead, obstreperous, whiney critic of scn (the B1 Operative)!
I believe this caper is also alive and well on various internet boards and chat rooms. (Watch for the completely inane and unreasonable idiot-critic who makes you feel like leaving the chat or board.)

That will do for now, perhaps some of the other ex-GO/OSA crew will chip in or perhaps this idea will just be ignored and ridiculed as fanciful paranoia. Unfortunately, it’s not. One day I may even discover the courage to tell the whole story but many of the actors are still alive and would be hurt or imprisoned for no tangible gain (they’re almost all Ex-scn’ists now).
I decided to post this as a means of making good on some part of the damage I did to the Critic Movement in years long gone. Perhaps if I’d been less effective at my job, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion today.
To those I hurt along the way, I sincerely apologise.
Love, Panda.

* The things on the list of “suitable criticisms” were just general, already widely published views about scn. The only thing that was forbidden was any mention of LRH, that was to be avoided if possible but, of course, it never was. The sci-fi writer background or the “why write for pennies, if you want to get really rich just start your own religion” quote were the most common criticisms of LRH at the time. You listened to it and even agreed but never contributed to this particular line of criticism. Of course, we knew nothing about the abuse and exploitation exposed in later years, we thought we were saving mankind.

Wow! Brilliant and very important post, Panda. Glad you started this thread. Knowing how it goes is key.
 

Lurker5

Gold Meritorious Patron
Yeah

Yeah, I get that - the paranoia. We all have to live with a bit of that, I think. Just because a person is paranoid, doesn't mean there aren't valid reasons for that.

Beware of who is courting you - for whatever reason. If it seems too good to be true, it probably is - - -

It's a cog in the wheel that probably is never gonna be gotten out - fully.

It will work itself out into a livable form - eventually. But keep an eye on your back.

What can I say? It must be so much worse for those 'out' under their own name.
 

Nicole

Silver Meritorious Patron
Wow! Brilliant and very important post, Panda. Glad you started this thread. Knowing how it goes is key.

It is a very great post and it happen in this way and that is my or the problem.

An example:
You met a person on a board. Another critic with evil Scientology experiences. That person says it lives in the near, let's do something together. You are very carefull, but it would be great to make something together against Cof$. Telephone numbers gets changed. Some telephone calls happen. You didn't stop to critic Cof$ in the public. That person plans a raid and invites you. But before this all happen the person wants to meet you. You decide to go to a public place with the person...

It could be really a critic, but it could also be OSA... What to do?:confused2: It is so evil to think about this things.:yes:
 

AnonyMary

Formerly Fooled - Finally Free
It is a very great post and it happen in this way and that is my or the problem.

An example:
You met a person on a board. Another critic with evil Scientology experiences. That person says it lives in the near, let's do something together. You are very carefull, but it would be great to make something together against Cof$. Telephone numbers gets changed. Some telephone calls happen. You didn't stop to critic Cof$ in the public. That person plans a raid and invites you. But before this all happen the person wants to meet you. You decide to go to a public place with the person...

It could be really a critic, but it could also be OSA... What to do?:confused2: It is so evil to think about this things.:yes:

Yes. It is a price we pay to take safeguards and make sacrifices.

Because I wish to remain anonymous so I can continue on helping people and keeping my family together, I have been approached many times by people trying to get in contact with me or to find out who I am. As a rule, I do not give out my private info. Only a few have it and they are proven trusted people who have given their names on the internet and let people contact them. I use skype-to-skype for calls or turn off my caller ID and only talk when I have to. I only met an ex one time and since I live far from orgs and people in general, it took alot to organize that but it was worth it. Thing is, I knew of the person before hand. Never just give out contact information until you know for certain the person is a trusted and known ex, like Emma or Marcus, or Chuck Beatty... just to throw out some names for reality sake. There are many. Just ask for contacts who can verify if you are n doubt. Make sure those contacts are equally visable and trustworthy.

I make it clear to people to not take offense at the measure I take but to understand that this is what I have to do to protect myself, my family and the victims I help.

Skype and google phone are good cheap ( and even free) ways to communicate. You can block your ID and pre-arrange phone calls. There are people here who you can PM. Don't feel so alone, Nicole because you aren't.
((HUGGS))

Mary
 

MrNobody

Who needs merits?
Well, one could say some paranoia might be justified, we're talking OSA after all. The thing is: OSA people will do what they do, whether you fear them or not. So Lurker5 gave good advice, and I'll enforce it: Cover your backside as good as possible, and always make sure you're on the safe side and avoid doing stupid stuff that might come back and bite you later on.

That's basically it.

A life full of fear is not what I would call a good life - and living a good life is the best revenge one can have, IMO. Yes, OSA are the enemy, trying to harm or even destroy innocent people in the name of their deluded "belief". It's good advice to always keep that in mind.

In other words: Respect your enemy. Don't underestimate them, there definitely *is* stuff they can do. But: If you have to live a life full of fear and paranoia, they've already won. They will control you and your life from that point on. Don't give them that. They aren't worth it.

The better your life is, the harder is theirs. They get slapped and pressured by their seniors etc, if they fail to scare you into deep paranoia. I don't know about others, but I would find that slightly amusing. Plus it might wake some of them up and make them *think* about what they're doing. They might even ask themselves some questions. I'd call that a win-win situation.

Jus' my €002
 
Top