OSA's Official DA on Debbie Cook's e-mail

Local DSA's and OSA's have been using a DA pack to handle anyone game enough to mention that they read Debbie Cook's E-mail.

It has some extremely tortured use of Hubbard policy to discredit Cook's ability to understand policy well enough to apply it, that is, instead of putting it on the rack until it vindicates whatever you want it to say.

I'm looking for help from some of you Green on White pundits to point out the abuse of Hubbard's actual intentions.

I'd do it myself but I've developed an allergy.:nervous:

Cop ya later!


2 Jan 2012

Church Expansion and Fundraising Activities

Scientologists contribute voluntarily and generously to the Church both for the religious services in which they participate as well as to support the opening of new ideal Orgs and the implementation of large‐scale humanitarian and social programs around the world.

A great number of international Church programs, particularly in the fields of drug education and rehabilitation, raising literacy standards and advancing human rights, are funded by grants from the International Association of Scientologists, which raises donations from its members without regard to their participation in any services.

Scientologists contribute because they want to receive the benefit of LRH’s tech and they want millions of people world over to benefit from it too and thus achieve the Aims of Scientology.

The result of these efforts is unprecedented expansion in the actual delivery of Scientology religious services—an increase of 40 times over previous levels—and the religion now measured in terms of more than 10,000 Churches, Missions and affiliated groups, with millions of members in 167 countries.

What follows are the applicable LRH references in response to specific claims.

1. Soft Sell

These are the specific activities to which SPs object:

Establishing a membership system that enables Scientology to expand technical deliver to the broad Fourth Dynamic

Asking people to donate to the expansion of Scientology.

Establishing orgs that mirror LRH’s standards for Ideal Orgs.

Demanding that orgs expand fast and that they build themselves up to the size of an Ideal Org in a matter of weeks-just like LRH did at Saint Hill in the 1960s.

Upholding an exact standard of technical quality and refusing to compromise for the sake of popularity.

LRH covered this phenomena in HCO PL 7 August 1965, Issue I, SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS, MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF:

“Soft sell ” is another recommendation of the SP.

And “build it quietly” and “get only decent people” are all part of this.

When somebody is demanding less reach, that person is an SP.

Therefore, we have another characteristic:

2. SPs RECOMMEND INEFFECTIVE DISSEMINATION AND FIND FAULT WITH ANY BEING DONE.

LRH

HCO PL 7 August 1965, Issue I

SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS,

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF

2. Rumors

Seeking to undermine the expansion of Scientology by spreading false rumors about Church executives in good standing is something that has been pushed by squirrels in the past. LRH faced similar unfounded attacks when he was first forming Dianetics and Scientology orgs. His response in 1953 was as follows:

On the subject of rumors, America sure likes to close terminals with a lot of chatter. In three years, I have never heard a true story in circulation about anyone. What a wild record! Recently so many reports reached me in various ways about Walsh in LA that I wrote some real mean letters in that direction. Further data revealed that not one of these reports I had received was true. How do you break up an organization? You just tell one section of it how bad another section is until it falls apart. Simple?

How do you kill Scientology or Dianetics? Why, just convince everyone that “while the work is all right, Hubbard is — well — “. How do you lose business? They tell your potential students and preclears that “while the subject may have merit, the people who run that associate school –”. Just like many a preclear starts trouble amongst auditors. Auditor A helps him but he tells Auditor B that Auditor A is a dog. Auditor B gets self- righteous and tackles Auditor A. They discover that this pc gave a wrong end-up account of the whole thing.

Should you believe a psychotic 1.1 pc? Or does he cause more trouble if you listen? Should you believe the Great American Grapevine? Believe the Martians have landed, believe that the sun has just exploded, believe that water runs uphill, but believe John Public’s favorite comm line? Never!

. . .

I have to build with men and many men are straw. It isn’t a problem of picking the wrong man or the right man. Men are men. Until we make them there are damned few right ones. So stand steady under rumor fire and know there is not and never will be serious competition of opposition except in our own minds.

Stay true to our goals and to truth and we will attain those goals. I think they are worth attaining.

LRH

23 Apr 1953

RE: ASSOCIATE NEWSLETTER

3. International Association of Scientologists

Misinformation and wrong information has been spread on what the IAS is supposed to be.

The IAS did not replace the HASI. They are entirely different entities existing at different times with different purposes.

On March 12, 1966, L. Ron Hubbard announced in HCO Executive Letter that the Hubbard Association of Scientologists International, Inc. had been replaced by the Church of Scientology of California as the senior corporate entity in Scientology. This announcement included that effective 5 April 1966, all of Saint Hill, including the International Executive Division of Scientology, would be under the corporate control of the Church of Scientology of California. This ended the role of the HASI as the senior corporate entity in Scientology.

The International Association of Scientologists is a membership organization founded by individual Scientologists in October of 1984. It is not a management organization, but a membership organization, the purpose of which is to unite, advance, support and protect Scientology and Scientologists in all parts of the world so as to achieve the aims of Scientology as originated by LRH.

As with the HASI, the IAS has annual and lifetime memberships. Beyond that, there are levels of honor statuses to acknowledge the contributions of Scientologists.

Since 1984 the Churches of Scientology have adopted membership in the International Association of Scientologists as their official membership system.

The existence of the IAS makes possible the broad application of Scientology technology to many levels of society and applies for the first time in our history what LRH describes here:

SCIENTOLOGY FIVE:

Scientology applied at a high echelon to social, political and scientific problems. This requires the earlier levels and a high state of training on theoretical and wide- application levels and the personal state of OT.

LRH

HCO PL of 2 August 1963, Issue I

URGENT, PUBLIC PROJECT ONE:

In fact, the existence of the IAS makes possible these specific Fourth Dynamic activities envisioned by LRH:

These programs address fundamental ruins that block planetary clearing. LRH had this to say about the vital importance of these programs to export his technology broadly on the Fourth Dynamic:

Scientology has no interest in the political or social aspects of the various types of drugs or even drug-taking as such. The whole interest of Scientology is concentrated on those who want to ”get unhooked” and “stay unhooked.”

In one Scientology organization at least half of those coming in for processing have been on drugs and this figure is less than that in the surrounding public where it evidently goes to an even higher percentage. Therefore, in 1968 and 1969 research on this as a specialized subject was completed successfully.

Scientologists do not stand ready to punish drug takers or reform a whole society on the subject. But they do stand ready and are active in helping anyone or any government to handle the problem.

Like the Flaming Youth era of the Prohibition 20s, drug-taking will probably also come to pass away as a national pastime. But it will leave a lot of people who wish they hadn’t. The Scientologist can help those. And are helping them right now as a routine duty to the community.

LRH

Article of 25 September 1969 entitled, DRUG PROBLEMS

* * *

Human rights must be made a fact not an idealistic dream. The very basis of human rights is freedom from false accusations and from brutality and punishment without offense. Somehow, government by prejudice and false report must end in the West or the West itself will end. By bringing about real human rights , perhaps there would be enough cause in the West to be worth fighting for. Somehow society in the West must be revitalized after decades of arduous degradation. It will not be an easy feat. It is very hard to save a being or government who is bent whole-heartedly on self-destruction.

LRH

Ron’s Journal 1969

28 February 1969

* * *

A society to survive well, needs at least as many Volunteer Ministers as it has policemen. A society gets what it concentrates upon. By concentrating on spiritual values instead of criminality a new day may yet dawn for man.

LRH

Article, RELIGIOUS INFLUENCE IN SOCIETY; THE ROLE OF THE VOLUNTEER MINISTER 1976

* * *

…The Way to Happiness. It is going like wildfire. It is being translated into many, many other languages…What we have here is a grass-roots revolution spreading far beyond the perimeters of organizations. The potential, all by itself, is an uplift in the decency and integrity of man.

LRH

Ron’s Journal 33

Holidays 1981/1982

4. Ideal Orgs are Fulfilling LRH’s Intention for Churches of Scientology

The Ideal Org program is about delivering quality of service.

The sole purpose of our Ideal Org strategy is to be able to deliver ALL the services LRH intended to make available to mankind and to do it in an environment conducive to people rapidly stepping onto and moving on the Bridge. And to expand all orgs to a level they can deliver that quantity and quality of service at once.

In lectures and policies, LRH described his vision of an Ideal Org. It is this vision that is now being put into reality, as the following excerpts show:

These are awfully good people in Central Organizations. These are terrific people. At a sacrifice of considerable income and a lot of other sacrifices, these fellows and girls stay on the job and get the job done. One could not render a high enough tribute to them, because it has not been easy and they have done it extremely well. And they’re still there and they’ve still got the show on the road.

And now we’re thinking in terms of new buildings and designing new buildings all over the world. In other words, we’ve kept it there for a long time; now we’re going to keep it there with exclamation points. We’ve even got the designs for these buildings.

Actually, it requires two types of building in one of these Central Organizations. It requires a city building, one that is downtown and rises straight up from the ground to some height. And it requires one out in the country which sprawls all over the place.

LRH

Lecture 3 Sep 1962

YOUR SCIENTOLOGY ORGS & WHAT THEY DO FOR YOU

* * *

Now, the org board itself should express itself on the floor of the org. You say, “Well, then the ideal org building would be something that had a big — three long buildings, that would be the Executive Division and those three buildings would be in sequence, and then they would have buildings which are HCO buildings, and then it would have buildings which were Dissem buildings and then it would have Accounting Sections and then those would be that and go right on down to 6″ And that would be absolutely correct. That would be how the org form should be built if you’re going to build the building.

LRH

FLAG EXECUTIVE BRIEFING COURSE

HOLD THE FORM OF THE ORG

PART I – ESTO #7

A lecture given on 4 March 1972

* * *

EXPANSION. It is upon expansion that victory depends. But how much expansion is EXPANSION? Well, to give you a hint, you all know how big and busy Saint Hill was in the mid-60′s. Well, I ran it up from six staff to that in very short order indeed. It was the last org I ran directly as its ED.

LRH

LRH ED 339R Int

13 March 1982

* * *

And there was another point – it is a different idea: The consideration that it takes a long time to build something is not true. That itself is an aberration, an effort to discourage destruction by pretending creation takes a long time . It took only a few weeks to build the old Saint Hill org. That they did the same thing a few years later in Boston shows that it is not just I who can do it.

LRH

LRH ED 339R-1

10 October 1982

* * *

And when you fully grasp the basic definition of organization and are trying to build, make viable and expand one, you will be very hard on anyone who is discoordinating or blunting the purposes, damaging or omitting the lines and is disestablishing the terminals. You will understand exactly what that person is doing. He is seeking to make the organization less viable and trying to contract and destroy it. So know your enemies.”

LRH

HCO PL 20 Aug 1982

ORGANIZATIONAL BASICS

* * *

LRH personally built Saint Hill and Flag. Those are big, posh, impressive orgs!

5. Donations For New Buildings

OT Committees have long been a powerful force for the dissemination of Scientology. In HCO PL 11 August 1967, OT CENTRAL COMMITTEE, LRH set out the purpose of the OT Committee:

The purpose of the OT Central Committee is TO HELP LRH ORGANIZEAND CHANNEL OT FORCES, INTERESTS AND RESOURCES FOR THE GREATEST GOOD FOR SCIENTOLOGY.

LRH

HCO PL 11 August 1967

OT CENTRAL COMMITTEE

In HCO PL of 24 December 1966, Issue I,HOW TO PROGRAM AN ORG SAINT HILL PROGRAMS, LRH lays out the important programs that must be concentrated on to ensure the expansion of Scientology. These include OT Committees obtaining new buildings for our Churches:

The sequence of major programs at Saint Hill:

. . .

To help Scientology dissemination and attack more broadly to prevent such quantities of legal defense. ( OT activities program just begun.)

. . .

Buildings for Scientology orgs. (OT activities .)

LRH

HCO PL of 24 December 1966, Issue I,

HOW TO PROGRAM AN ORG SAINT HILL PROGRAMS

And as for obtaining donations directly for the purchase of new buildings, in HCO Policy Letter of 2 December 1968, GUNG-HO GROUPS, LRH writes specifically about it in this fashion:

CONTRIBUTIONS

The most heavily worked-over income point of most civic-minded groups is the obtaining of contributions.

These can be quite sizable.

They do not however, come easily unless the group has a nonprofit status and the patron can thereby deduct it from his income tax.

A group, however, that registers as a charity and is a member of existing nonprofit organizations can obtain contributions.

Governments have been known to contribute large sums to groups.

Contributions should be worked at but should be regarded as an irregular source of income and not counted on for the general running expenses of a group. Rather, they are like an affluence, and major projects are the best use for contributions and the best reason to get them — such as a new building for the group or a new hall, things like that.

LRH

HCO Policy Letter of 2 December 1968

GUNG-HO GROUPS

6. Actions being taken to ensure technical quality across the broad face of Scientology.

Ensuring that people actually make the grade at all levels of The Bridge is a primary responsibility of all Scientologists. It has happened in the past that quickie delivery has threatened the survival of Scientology. LRH has written about it is the entire Keeping Scientology Working Series. In particular, in HCO PL 26 May 1961, Keeping Scientology Working Series 2, QUALITY COUNTS, he emphasizes:

Clearing is now in the reach of every Scientologist.

Excellent auditor training is now in the reach of every Academy.

. . .

I have made the grade technically in the field of research. Now it’s time to drop all the booboos and nonsense. All you have to do in an org is release and clear people and turn out auditors who can release people and keep in contact with the public and treat them well and you’re over the top.

Right here and right now this policy is laid down in concrete with an atomic branding iron: THE FIRST AND PRIMARY GOAL OF AN ORGANIZATION IS DELIVERING THE FOREMOST TECHNICAL QUALITY THAT CAN BE DELIVERED IN ITS AREA.

LRH

HCO PL 26 May 1961

Keeping Scientology Working Series 2

QUALITY COUNTS

What makes this standard of quality possible is the existence of a Qualification Division and the ability of Scientology to correct its technical application is what sets this subject apart from any other.

And your next lineup, immediately after your technical, is the point that has been missed in all org charts on this planet and back to eighty trillion years ago. You can’t make a product — just make a product. That is not possible. Times change, things alter. You can’t just say it’s a product. And nobody does, oddly enough, but they don’t have it on their org boards. And sooner or later they neglect it. They’ve got to qualify the product. Got to qualify it. They’ve got to say, “This is how it behaves, and this is what it does,” and then they got to go back and straighten up in the manufacture of the product anything that went wrong in making the product that made it fall down in qualification so that it couldn’t meet the conditions which it was going to be used under. Do you see? So this was an absolutely vital step.

LRH

Lecture of 6 April 1965

ORG BOARD AND LIVINGNESS

Finally, ensuring the Quality and Purity of Scientology, was entrusted by LRH to Religious Technology Center and Chairman of the Board RTC.

BUT, can a power push against the Church happen again? Well, only if you fail to turn your back on squirrels and demand on-policy actions and HCOB tech in all executives and if you support only those who work to keep Scientology working. My earnest advice is: Only deal with or associate with those organizations licensed by RTC and auditors in good standing with the Church; close your ears to false statements made by bad hats and thus really clear the planet. Only then can such power pushes fail and note that not only every earlier power push but also that this last one did fail. And look at the resulting stats and gains when it all came right again!

LRH

Lecture 31 Dec 1983

TODAY AND TOMORROW: THE PROOF

* * *

You should support your organizations in your area. You should support Scientology organizations. You actually should discourage trying to knock them apart. The reason people get mad at them is they have missed withholds from them more than the fact that organizations are trying to do something to them or are failing to do something for them. We Scientologists have got to pull together.”

LRH

Lecture 3 Sep 1962

Your Scientology Orgs & What They Do For You

oOo
 
Last edited:

LA SCN

NOT drinking the kool-aid
..."The result of these efforts is unprecedented expansion in the actual delivery of Scientology religious services—an increase of 40 times over previous levels—and the religion now measured in terms of more than 10,000 Churches, Missions and affiliated groups, with millions of members in 167 countries."

Dear OSA:The quote above from your recent DA document is a bit glib and general; please some substantiating DOX or STFU
:eyeroll:
 

Kookaburra

Gold Meritorious Patron
..."The result of these efforts is unprecedented expansion in the actual delivery of Scientology religious services—an increase of 40 times over previous levels—and the religion now measured in terms of more than 10,000 Churches, Missions and affiliated groups, with millions of members in 167 countries."

Dear OSA:The quote above from your recent DA document is a bit glib and general; please some substantiating DOX or STFU
:eyeroll:

They can't. Scientology is factually shrinking and the actual delivery of Scientology services is about one fortieth or less of what it was in the 1960s. I think that graphs may be on the Friends of LRH site if anyone wants to see them (in B4 DOX or STFU:biggrin:).
 

Free to shine

Shiny & Free
This sentence is chilling. I must admit to not wanting to read any further.
I hope the reference guys around here can help.

I have to build with men and many men are straw. It isn’t a problem of picking the wrong man or the right man. Men are men. Until we make them there are damned few right ones.

And "40 times increase", how long can they keep that shit up?? Keep saying it fast enough and loud enough and it becomes fact? :duh:
 

Rene Descartes

Gold Meritorious Patron
2. SPs RECOMMEND INEFFECTIVE DISSEMINATION AND FIND FAULT WITH ANY BEING DONE.

And OTs recommend ludicrous PR tactics that make the Church look like fools in the eyes of the universe.

OTs recommend thousands of bulk mailings for which no study has been perfromed to determine how many of those thousands of bulk mail have actually produced 1 new person onlines. This is a perverse corrolary to the Law of Diminishing Returns. LRH who was big on the word "leverage" which he used a lot in the book Battlefiled Earth can't even see that if bul mail worked, and there was leverage invovled thousands of bulk mail would bring in 10s of thousands of new people on line. Bulk Mail is an example of "reverse leverage". You take a 10,000 lb sledge hamer and use it crack open an acron.

In their eyes all it is that its enough to find something written by LRH and that means it is going to work because St Hill expanded. I suspect that many of the people who went to the orignal St Hill were on a waiting list ahead of the fact.

Expanding slow is an SP trait? Since when did buying buildings equate to expansion?

Many businesses in the world have expanded just fine without LRH policy and despite buying many new buildings. In the real buisness world corporations buy buildingd when the need them. If a corporation opened up 20 new "ideal" offices but had no staff for them but planned to get them the price of their stock would drop.

If a corporation had low earnings and their solution was to open up 20 new stores that might drive their stock up but if earnings aren't turned around quick the stock price will drop quicker.

I have news for the CoS. They are expanding slow. Debbie Cook is after results, that is people putting money down on services instead of buildings. This equates to products sold, for example TVs in a store. A lot of stores with little or no sales equate to no expansion.

LRH business model is bad

Pope on a Rope business model is bad

Debbie Cook business model - I have no idea.

The problem is they are trying to run a Church like a business and the business model they are using stinks.

And their PR model.

They are a nightmare unleashed. They brag about reacing out to the world but that does not justify their use of the model here.

McDonals does not build 1,000 more restaurants in the US because they are selling mroe haburgers in the third world countries.

Ok I got my rant off I feel better now. Carry on

Rd00
 

Ho Tai

Patron Meritorious
People who read Debbie's email may be dragged in to read the DA pack, but the damage has been done. For many people, her email will ring true and regardless of how many LRH quotes will be presented to invalidate her statements, a number of people will still trust their own minds and will remember what she said. If her email didn't prompt them to leave at the time, perhaps some day in the future they will experience some outrageous act of the CoS that will be the tipping point. But it will be the tipping point because of the weight of Debbie's email that was added to the pile of wrongnesses they had accumulated over the years.
 

Jquepublic

Silver Meritorious Patron
People who read Debbie's email may be dragged in to read the DA pack, but the damage has been done. For many people, her email will ring true and regardless of how many LRH quotes will be presented to invalidate her statements, a number of people will still trust their own minds and will remember what she said. If her email didn't prompt them to leave at the time, perhaps some day in the future they will experience some outrageous act of the CoS that will be the tipping point. But it will be the tipping point because of the weight of Debbie's email that was added to the pile of wrongnesses they had accumulated over the years.

Yep. She dared to say out loud what everyone with two brain cells left has been secretly thinking for years. The cult can't undo that, no matter how many DA packs they wanna put together.
 

Veda

Sponsor
Local DSA's and OSA's have been using a DA pack to handle anyone game enough to mention that they read Debbie Cook's E-mail.

It has some extremely tortured use of Hubbard policy to discredit Cook's ability to understand policy well enough to apply it, that is, instead of putting it on the rack until it vindicates whatever you want it to say.

I'm looking for help from some of you Green on White pundits to point out the abuse of Hubbard's actual intentions.

I'd do it myself but I've developed an allergy.:nervous:

Cop ya later!

Do you really want to know about Hubbard's "actual intentions"?

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?2697-Table-of-Contents-Psychopolitics-revisited

It ain't pretty.

Something about smashing his name into hard granite for 10,000 years, and slaves, and lust for money and power.

One of Hubbard's actual intentions was that Scientology be run as a "tight conspiracy," with "policy" that can be made to rationalize almost anything.

There's confidential green on white (not in the Green Volumes), and all those (confidential) LRH advises, which are senior to advertised-to-wogs-and-raw-meat policy, senior to not-advertised-to-wogs-and-raw-meat policy, and senior even to confidential policy.

Then above it all is that smashing thing again, and that hard granite...

Which brings us to Hubbard's Law of Commotion, but never mind...

Thanks for the update and the info. :)
 

afaceinthecrowd

Gold Meritorious Patron
One of my reoccurring WTF’s during my time in Scn and SO days is perfectly framed by this latest little gem from OSA re: Debbie.

Over the years a whole lotta folks from John Q. Public’s to McMaster, Roos, Hana to the Mayo’s, etc. were trained and processed to the highest “levels”, had “stellar stats” and sacrificed most other parts of their lives for years and years all for the good of the group. Then one fine day they’re and “SP”, “Criminal”, “Nobody”, a “worthless and destructive” staff member. And, therein, was my big WTF. :yes:

How can the “Tech” be right, be perfect be valid if a person can go to the top of the “Bridge” and either not be “detected” or “found out” or, especially, suddenly turn SP, Evil and Insane? :confused2:

Any practicing SCN that doesn’t have a WTF about that is either lying to themselves or is so far gone they will probably never recover…M&M come to mind…of course they’d say that DM’s the SP…along with Mayo, Hana, Armstrong, etc…which only proves my point. :coolwink:

Face :)
 

TG1

Angelic Poster
People who read Debbie's email may be dragged in to read the DA pack, but the damage has been done. For many people, her email will ring true and regardless of how many LRH quotes will be presented to invalidate her statements, a number of people will still trust their own minds and will remember what she said. If her email didn't prompt them to leave at the time, perhaps some day in the future they will experience some outrageous act of the CoS that will be the tipping point. But it will be the tipping point because of the weight of Debbie's email that was added to the pile of wrongnesses they had accumulated over the years.

GAWD, I hope, really, really hope the cult is dragging in people to read the DA pack. I especially hope getting people to read the DA pack has now become an important "showing our support for Pope Miscavige" stat!

That tactic is right up there with the cult's over-the-top Freedumb publications. It's so great for the cause. But just not for the cult's cause.

:thumbsup:
 
Do you really want to know about Hubbard's "actual intentions"?

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?2697-Table-of-Contents-Psychopolitics-revisited

It ain't pretty.

Something about smashing his name into hard granite for 10,000 years, and slaves, and lust for money and power.

One of Hubbard's actual intentions was that Scientology be run as a "tight conspiracy," with "policy" that can be made to rationalize almost anything.

There's confidential green on white (not in the Green Volumes), and all those (confidential) LRH advises, which are senior to advertised-to-wogs-and-raw-meat policy, senior to not-advertised-to-wogs-and-raw-meat policy, and senior even to confidential policy.

Then above it all is that smashing thing again, and that hard granite...

Which brings us to Hubbard's Law of Commotion, but never mind...

Thanks for the update and the info. :)

attachment.php
 

La La Lou Lou

Crusader
Reminds me of that wonderful phrase, ''head on a pike''.

Scaring the crap out of anyone who thinks of publicly disagreeing, by making an example of anyone who dares open their mouths. This form of manipulation belongs in Imperial China, Mao's Peking, Rome, Nuremberg, Phnom Penh, not a 'religion' that makes people free.
 
How can the “Tech” be right, be perfect be valid if a person can go to the top of the “Bridge” and either not be “detected” or “found out” or, especially, suddenly turn SP, Evil and Insane?
It's the good Ole Simon Bolivar policy at work - if you don't give them a game, the game becomes get you... If Hub finished the damn OT levels through OT 22 like he said he was going to do, they could release one every few years and everybody would be happy. But No, he had to write the Mission Earth decology instead...

Mimsey
 

freethinker

Sponsor
Anyone could read that DA pack and see Debbie is wrong and anyone can read that DA pack and see that Debbie is right.

It's the environment they are dragged into, fraught with [STRIKE]coercion[/STRIKE] theta, and the verbal interpretation of those policies that [STRIKE]intimidates[/STRIKE] convinces them that debbie is a SP squirrel
 

Vittorio

Patron Meritorious
One of my reoccurring WTF’s during my time in Scn and SO days is perfectly framed by this latest little gem from OSA re: Debbie.

Over the years a whole lotta folks from John Q. Public’s to McMaster, Roos, Hana to the Mayo’s, etc. were trained and processed to the highest “levels”, had “stellar stats” and sacrificed most other parts of their lives for years and years all for the good of the group. Then one fine day they’re and “SP”, “Criminal”, “Nobody”, a “worthless and destructive” staff member. And, therein, was my big WTF. :yes:

How can the “Tech” be right, be perfect be valid if a person can go to the top of the “Bridge” and either not be “detected” or “found out” or, especially, suddenly turn SP, Evil and Insane? :confused2:

Any practicing SCN that doesn’t have a WTF about that is either lying to themselves or is so far gone they will probably never recover…M&M come to mind…of course they’d say that DM’s the SP…along with Mayo, Hana, Armstrong, etc…which only proves my point. :coolwink:

Face :)

I would love to see the SP Declare list in full. It must be getting long now.
 
Top