What's new

Papers on Spirituality - Peer Reviews

me myself & i

Patron Meritorious
I wish someone had spoken to me like I spoke to Vinaire when I first got into Scientology.

Letting a person decieve themselves as much as Vinnaire does, or worse, trying to decieve others into believing one is enlightened and scientific, is not doing anyone any favors.

It is what Hubbard did.

Would you tell all the members of this board who were mislead and fell for the same self-deluding style of a con, who now criticize it on this board, that they should just let Hubbard be himself?

The Anabaptist Jacques

Well AJ, it's been a while since I first read Vinaire's post, then read your response to his post and then followed with my response to your response to Vinaire's post. lol.

And now I get it. I understand what you're saying. I went back and re-read the progression to do so.

To answer your question above, no I would not in any way shape or form tell members they should have let Hubbard be himself in regard to his self-declared, spiritually-pronounced, quasi-intellectual scientific brilliance which self-declaration (and self-delusion) was designed at some level to merely enslave, those that sincerely believed. Thus your point is well made and well taken.

On the other hand I cannot bring myself to believe the spirit of Hubbard and the spirit of Vinaire are cut of the same cloth, so to speak. And by the word spirit I simply mean being.

The motives of the former being unlike anything of the motives of the later. I believe. Thus I believe V is worth being afforded the dignity of one whom is innocently (emotionally) though arrogantly (intellectually) speculating as to what the fucks going on. So to speak. In the absence of an evil motive. Which leaves the sin of being 'spiritually annoying'. Lol.

Hell we're all spiritually annoying in the right company.

You wrote:
Letting a person deceive themselves as much as Vinaire does, or worse, trying to deceive others into believing one is enlightened and scientific, is not doing anyone any favors.
The Anabaptist Jacques

To which I say,,,,,,there is a huge philosophical distinction between consciously letting a person deceive themselves and consciously letting a person deceive another. Huge distinction. Which distinction it seems to me you do not make (emotionally). Or make meaningful (intellectually). Which is understandable to be sure.

However, the way I see it is 'being deceived' is a necessary part of being human, as a matter of practical human fact (if one is to hope to grow or expand in the science of understanding whats real and or true) lol. If I err here please correct me. Show me one human being in all of humanity that has not experienced 'being lied to' and I will lay down my pen forever AJ. Ok, so that's just a figure of speech. Lol. But the point remains the same. A deceiver is powerless in the presence of one that is not deceivable. And V's not trying to deceive anyone, let alone you or I. He's merely stating his constructions considerations and conclusions. Not worthy of an emotional lashing. Even if an intellectual spanking is called for.

mm&i
 

themadhair

Patron Meritorious
He's merely stating his constructions considerations and conclusions.
I think if you follow his posts you can see that it is much more than that. There is a lot of self-convincing going on, which is really difficult to watch at times. Like I said earlier, it is almost like watching someone drown themselves in slow motion while everyone can only sit back watching in horror.
 

me myself & i

Patron Meritorious
I think if you follow his posts you can see that it is much more than that. There is a lot of self-convincing going on, which is really difficult to watch at times. Like I said earlier, it is almost like watching someone drown themselves in slow motion while everyone can only sit back watching in horror.

Well, I've read one hell of a lot of V's posts along with numerous of his essays and while I share your interpretation of his seemingly 'self-convincing' style of writing (which appears as authoritative to the point of being annoying) I just can't seem to equate that with the reaction you equate it with, being namely, 'watching someone drown themselves in slow motion while everyone can only sit back watching in horror'. Lol.

Now perhaps I am sick, lol, but I will confess that line of yours cracks me up.

I can assure you V is not drowning and no one reading his take on 3-dimensional reality is reading his prose in 'horror'. Disagreement? for some for sure. Disgust? for others, yes. But HORROR?!! Lol!!! no way Jose.

It seems to me his insistence on employing Hubbardarian lingo to his writings and then placing that particular lingo here on the ESMB is the primary instigator of certain discomfort/s in the heart & mind of certain readers. Understandably so, to be sure.

mm&i
 

Auditor's Toad

Clear as Mud
Well, I've read one hell of a lot of V's posts along with numerous of his essays and while I share your interpretation of his seemingly 'self-convincing' style of writing (which appears as authoritative to the point of being annoying) I just can't seem to equate that with the reaction you equate it with, being namely, 'watching someone drown themselves in slow motion while everyone can only sit back watching in horror'. Lol.

Now perhaps I am sick, lol, but I will confess that line of yours cracks me up.

I can assure you V is not drowning and no one reading his take on 3-dimensional reality is reading his prose in 'horror'. Disagreement? for some for sure. Disgust? for others, yes. But HORROR?!! Lol!!! no way Jose.

It seems to me his insistence on employing Hubbardarian lingo to his writings and then placing that particular lingo here on the ESMB is the primary instigator of certain discomfort/s in the heart & mind of certain readers. Understandably so, to be sure.

mm&i

To me it watching someone write out their figure-figure on what Hubbard came up with it. Most readers here know Hubbard was full of shit. Now to watch someone endlessly stuck in figure-figure of Hubbards shit?

Yeah, 'watching someone drown themselves in slow motion' is accurate.

And, poor guy, he can't get unstuck from it
:nervous::nervous::nervous::nervous:
 

The Great Zorg

Gold Meritorious Patron
All tl;dr. :grouch:

God is dead. :grouch:

There is no tomorrow. :grouch:

Hmm... seems like that kind of thinking brought me to where I am today. :confused2:

It just occurred to me; THIS was my state of mind when I stumbled across scientology 35 years ago. :no:

I think I should be verrryyy careful over the next few months. :yes:

Now back to the thread:

tl;dr

Damn!...
 

Vinaire

Sponsor
If anybody is drowning here, it is you guys.

If anyone is wasting their minds, it is you all. Look at all the frivolous chatter that goes on incessantly among you.

I may be using some of Hubbard's lingo, but what I am talking about is diametrically opposite to Hubbardianism and Semiticism.

Semiticism is very similar to Hubbardianism. I don't think you all will ever be able to distance yourself from Hubbardianism unless you also distance yourself from Semiticism.

Make an effort to understand what Vedas are based on.

The five essays linked in the OP describe the fundamentals of the Vedas. I haven't seen a single person here comment on those essays. You are just engaged in frivolous chatter among yourselves.

What a waste of mind!

.
 

Auditor's Toad

Clear as Mud
"The five essays linked in the OP describe the fundamentals of the Vedas. I haven't seen a single person here comment on those essays. You are just engaged in frivolous chatter among yourselves."

I do enjoy the chatter here, wish I could same the same for your essays.

Extend your mind, join us !
 

me myself & i

Patron Meritorious
You are just engaged in frivolous chatter among yourselves.

.

If you had read the Veda's the way I do V. (which you apparently and understandably cannot) you would (I believe) understand that 'frivolous chatter' is the stuff the world is made of (by innuendo if by no other means). Being as necessary to wisdom as darkness is to light. So to speak.

In regard to our being 'amongst ourselves' who pray tell should we be amongst? If not ourselves? lol!

Look V, I love you man. From heart to heart & soul to soul and above and beneath & beyond all words this world has to offer, but I gotta tell you, the Veda's teach the Silence of Wisdom in Spirit is far beyond the knowing of mental articulation to me. And mental articulation precedes all writing. And writing precedes all speech (and is speech).

Please meditate on that my friend. It has unspeakably beautiful consequences.

We cannot be misunderstood when we understand all others.

Love,

mm&i

footnote: in terms of what's meaningful to ourselves.
 

me myself & i

Patron Meritorious
If you had read the Veda's the way I do V. (which you apparently and understandably cannot) you would (I believe) understand that 'frivolous chatter' is the stuff the world is made of (by innuendo if by no other means). Being as necessary to wisdom as darkness is to light. So to speak.

In regard to our being 'amongst ourselves' who pray tell should we be amongst? If not ourselves? lol!

Look V, I love you man. From heart to heart & soul to soul and above and beneath & beyond all words this world has to offer, I love you, and, but, I gotta tell you this, the Veda's teach the Silence of Wisdom in Spirit is far beyond the knowing of mental articulation to me. And mental articulation precedes all writing. And writing precedes all speech (and is speech).

Please meditate on this my friend. It has unspeakably Beautiful consequences.

We cannot be misunderstood when we understand all others. (spiritually speaking of course lol)

Love,

mm&i

footnote: in terms of what's meaningful to ourselves.

p.s. I am a certified lunatic (in certain orders, lol).

Though loved just the same. smile.......
 
Last edited:

Free Being Me

Crusader
I have reviewed this essay and subsequent posts. Why? Bored I guess. Here's a suggestion. Contact Slappy, tell him you are channeling Hubtard and the New Improved Golden Age Of Tripe can be released to the world for global ridicule. Don't forget to market the Official Haggis Bracelet for those completing this drivel.
 

nexus100

Gold Meritorious Patron
I have reviewed this essay and subsequent posts. Why? Bored I guess. Here's a suggestion. Contact Slappy, tell him you are channeling Hubtard and the New Improved Golden Age Of Tripe can be released to the world for global ridicule. Don't forget to market the Official Haggis Bracelet for those completing this drivel.

Obviously, Vinaire pulled you in.:melodramatic:
 

Vinaire

Sponsor
If you had read the Veda's the way I do V. (which you apparently and understandably cannot) you would (I believe) understand that 'frivolous chatter' is the stuff the world is made of (by innuendo if by no other means). Being as necessary to wisdom as darkness is to light. So to speak.

In regard to our being 'amongst ourselves' who pray tell should we be amongst? If not ourselves? lol!

Look V, I love you man. From heart to heart & soul to soul and above and beneath & beyond all words this world has to offer, but I gotta tell you, the Veda's teach the Silence of Wisdom in Spirit is far beyond the knowing of mental articulation to me. And mental articulation precedes all writing. And writing precedes all speech (and is speech).

Please meditate on that my friend. It has unspeakably beautiful consequences.

We cannot be misunderstood when we understand all others.

Love,

mm&i

footnote: in terms of what's meaningful to ourselves.

There is a time for chatter and a time for meditation.

There is Bhakti Yoga, Karma Yoga, Raja Yoga and Jnana Yoga.

Different people have different tendencies.

It is ok with me for you all to chatter. Of course, you are right.

.
 

Vinaire

Sponsor
I have reviewed this essay and subsequent posts. Why? Bored I guess. Here's a suggestion. Contact Slappy, tell him you are channeling Hubtard and the New Improved Golden Age Of Tripe can be released to the world for global ridicule. Don't forget to market the Official Haggis Bracelet for those completing this drivel.


I don't think you have understood a single word of those essays. You are still a Scientologist with a closed mind. You still think in terms of black and white.

And, of course, you are still being right too. :)

.
 

me myself & i

Patron Meritorious
Of course, you are right.

.

Thanks V.

And of course you are right too.

amirite?

lol.

mm&i

ps don't let these ESMBers stop the flow V. They're just party poopers.

Their like a rape victim listening to a self appointed rape-counselor (who uncannily resembles the rapist) explain rape to them in a new and improved intellectual/spiritual context or way.

If they don't get it, fuck em. Call em names. Call their thoughts nattering or chattering. Mention Hinduism. Or Semanticism. But whatever you do remember what Ron said: (fill in the blank) and carry on from there. Lol.

ppss. if the above sounds hard or rough or tough it's only because the spiritual violence suffered at the hands of Hubbard's Scientology demands a spiritual confrontation. Where linguistic niceties have no home.

And thus for the moment I am homeless.
 

paradox

ab intra silentio vera
mm&i, did you previously post under the moniker of "Mojo" from a couple years ago? If not, your styles are quite similar. Just wonderin'.
 

me myself & i

Patron Meritorious
mm&i, did you previously post under the moniker of "Mojo" from a couple years ago? If not, your styles are quite similar. Just wonderin'.

Yes. And still sign off some of my posts with the moniker you mention, Mojo.

In fact we have exchanged ideas more often than once that I can recall. Lol.

And how could it be elsewise? Your moniker is 'Paradox' for gods sake, and Paradox is my Joyful Underlying Reality. Lol.

Where Science and Spirit wink at one another.

That's where I am.

That's what I am.

With multiple nicks & names lol!

Mojo & mm&i

(and Loveroftruth0777 of many a year ago, when Magoo was first Magoo *ml)

* note to myself: henceforth 'ml' means 'more laughter' to me. which is to say more Joy
 
Top