Gadfly
Crusader
Key word, copyright.
Here:
Is my copyright enforceable?
Think about it.
I looked into some of this years back when I put up some anti-Scientology web sites.
As long as you use select quotes, don't copy and paste the entire article, and do not SELL any of it for profit, it is NOT a violation.
The Church of Scientology legal lemmings send out Cease & Desist Notices every time a new anti-Scientology web site appears, but these are scare tactics only, because they KNOW that as long as the sites are intellectual and aimed at a critique of the referenced materials, that there is not a damned thing they can do about it. You have to put the appropriate disclaimers, and make it clear that you are NOT the "C of S", so that you can't be found at fault for "hurting their trade image", but otherwise, citing segments of copy-written work is common. My question has to do with obtaining such materials. Does the Church of Scientology have any legal ground to demand that all "inter-office" communications remain "secret" (hid from public view)? The policies, Flag Orders, Base Orders and OSA N/W Orders are all company directions on how to run the company. While these may be copyrighted, can they be denied access by the public, and is it any sort of crime to bring such information to the public?
For example, Hubbard's essay on Personal Integrity is copyrighted in some book, or whatever. But, academic criticism and study are allowed to use segments of ANY copy-written material when presented as analysis. Segments of that essay have been cited here on ESMB. Of course, that essay is on Scientology's own web site.
So, again, I ask, can and does the C of S try to say that it is illegal to copy even just segments of copyrighted materials, that are intended to be used in critical studies? THAT is actually what firedragon did (at least from the bits I saw). She didn't copy entire sections, or whole books, and ONLY copied small sections, AND the aim and purpose was to use this in what could be called "academic criticism".
Obviously, people can and do copy sections of copy-written works all of the time. There are examples of segments of Scientology and Hubbard's writings all over the Internet, and no law is being broken.
I forget the exact verbiage, but if a segment of a copy-written work is used as part of some study, criticism or analysis, there is NO violation. THAT is a fact.
Also, it seems that once anything gets out, and is spread all over the Internet, it becomes part of the "public domain". Isn't that what happened with the OT III materials? They began showing up everywhere, and there was no stopping it, original theft violation or not.
It is surely NOT illegal to cite segments from such copy-written publications like Flag Orders and other Sea Org directives, but is it illegal to get at them and bring them to public view if the owner wants them to remain "hidden" or secret"? One is not actually "stealing" when taking digital photos.
