Voltaire's Child
Fool on the Hill
That's true. There are times and individuals who need meds and other treatments. And you know, the church doesn't even allow non Scn TALK therapy.
That was one of Gregor's major issues in Narconon. He felt "alone" and said, "Ive never been so stripped of myself in the middle of no where with no one, I call my mom twice a day" why do you think he had to reach out to his mom twice a day. Could it be that there was no individual therapy, no group therapy, and no help at all aside from their hardcore five hour saunas per day AFTER a half hour run through his letters while there, it was obvious that Gregor had NO ONE to talk to. As to the run, doctors say is one of the most dangerous things they do in combination with the sauna...also the niacin is a huge problem. They start you at a low dose and then bring it up to one so high that doctors have said that it can cause death. And people HAVE died as a result of Narconon's treatment. Just check out Narcononvictims.
http://www.narcononvictims.com/
As for a true mental illness like Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Anxiety, Mania, schitzophrenia, or Borderline Personality Disorder (to name a few) psychiatry does help. HOWEVER, it is the patients job to find the right psychiatrist and therapist. Many people have a hard time saying that a certain mental health professional is not for them. You should know by the third session. If you don't click with them, FIRE THEM, and find a new one.
Meds allowed me to be a teacher for ten years.
Being on medications is not fun. It does change your personality, it does affect your ability to work sometimes...sleep....sleep too much etc. BUT if things are that bad, you are on the wrong meds or med combination. I had a psychiatrist who kept adding meds ontop of meds until I was on six or seven at one time. I was like....something is not right here. I also challanged him on this and said, "don't you think we should take something away?" He just said take them. I wasn't satisfied with this...In order to get a new psychiatrist, after two weeks of calling every one listed in my blue Cross mental health book, I did something drastic. After all, I was having the spins, dropping to my knees in the shower because when I stood up everything spun and I almost passed out. I found out if I were to commit myself, they would not let me out with an immediate apointment with a psychiatrist. So... I went to the ER and said I was suicidal (lie) and went into the psych ward for a day and a half and walked out straight to an apointment with my favorite psychiatrist so far. BUT it's ridiculous that I had to do such a thing. I shouldn't have had to claim I was suidical and commit myself in order to get treatment! So, the system is not perfect.
I also suffered a very scary week due to lithium toxicity and ended up in the hospital for five days...when I came to...I couldn't remember anything that happened in the four days prior. I went off lithium for two months and then begged to be put back on it. It's the only thing for me that fends off those suicidal tendencies as well as depressions that leave you crying on the floor for days on end.
I want to bring up LISA MCPHERSON here because I imagine from what I've read and watched....that she was trying to get out of the church because she knew something was mentally wrong with her and that she knew she wouldn't get help if she stayed in the Scientology world. Also, she may have figured out that their auditing was placing her at risk. This is why she so drastically took off all her clothes...She was desperately trying to get the attention of a NON Scientology individual, and she did. But they got her anyway because they were responsible for her condition in the first place. Often the mentally ill will do drastic things to get help.
Herbal remedies can help certain conditions. They won't help you in the long run if you have a serious mental illness that needs attention.

I'm curious if you have heard of Dr. John Breeding. He's on youtube. the thing is he says there is no such thing as mental illness...
I do know that things that end up in the DSM IV come out of a meeting of head psychiatrists who notice something new and then it goes into the book. I do know that there is no direct way to prove any of them.....and I also know there is no test to prove you have a chemical imbalance. These things are true and well known. It's all based on behavior.
But if you are on the floor crying for four months it's not regular depression that you can come out of. There is a problem there. I mean it's just odd that this guy makes the claims he makes. Check it out just type in his name and you'll see. I just don't know what to think.
Scientology is ending baby!
to even argue with you about it, it's that bad. Pretty much the only thing you could say that would be worse is "you mocked up your mental illness." 
I'm a person who makes that argument, BWG (not the "you mocked it up", although "I mocked it up" might be accurate in my case). While I agree that the argument has been abused by CCHR and similar types, the lack of objective testing criteria HAS led to over-medication, misdiagnosis, and the APPEARANCE of propriety. It's like my saying that because people who have PMS are often irritable, anyone who is irritable should be diagnosed as PMS, and medicated. It's just poor logic, and though many people will accept it as being valid, it's not an equivalence relation. Irritability can have many causes, and so can depression. If the cause is not biochemical, and the argument that it "is" is circular, then why is it being medicated?
You're talking about an acute condition, where intervention is necessary, where most diagnosis of depression is NOT acute, but instead long-term and chronic depression, with no suicidal ideation and slight to no interference with regular function. Certainly, where it's acute, intervention is necessary (drugs being one of those interventions, change of environment another, supervision, etc.), but that is not the bulk of the cases.
While I understand your emphasis that a person knows when they are depressed, this doesn't obviate the need for objective criteria to establish MEDICAL causes for depression. It's one thing to say you think a person has depressive characteristics, and another thing to say they have a MEDICAL cause of depression. Again, in acute cases, intervene right away, but in others, establishing actual cause strikes me as being more responsible.
I would argue that you had your finger on the pulse, and disregarded it when you said that it doesn't stem from "...massive flaws in the way mental illness is defined". I think that's exactly the problem.
