I would like to make a comment here and at the same time thank Paul for the role he played in the initiation of one aspect of the current successful action. With the outcome of the recent election, there can be no doubt that the recommendations of the Senate Inquiry will be adopted. It was Paul’s information about COSRECI and how it operated in the UK and how the CofS in the UK was able to get charity status because of COSRECI when it didn’t qualify for such in the UK, as the result of the special arrangement between the UK and Australia. Paul’s recall and accuracy 30 years later was amazing.
It was someone, who wishes to remain anonymous, who was able to establish that COSRECI did not have and would never qualify for, charity status. This is a multi-million pound, if not hundreds of millions, fraud. And who owns St Hill and other UK properties? Yes, COSRECI! HMR&C has been fully briefed at the highest levels.
Here’s a thought. COSRECI was set up by the Guardians’ Office, well before David Miscavige became a Sea Org member. Operation Snow White convictions resulted in the effective removal of Mary Sue as a likely successor to Hubbard. I suspect that David Miscavige was behind the leak to the FBI using Ken Moxon, who as a result, became an unindicted co-conspiritor, and who was rewarded by Miscavige by being trained as an attorney and then acting for the CofS making big money. Ah! What irony, Miscavige destroys the G.O. and now the G.O is about to make a major contribution to the destruction of Miscavige.
Regards, David.
This is a great step forward. Well done Aussies!
But the battle is NOT yet won!
This Senate enquiry result, providing the Aussie government carry out the recommendations, (which you Aussies seem to thing they will) is equivalent to the UK Charity Commission's decision to not grant the cult charity status in the UK
At the time of the UK Charity Commissions decision, if ESMB had existed, we would have equally welcomed that decision as a victory.
BUT the cult is a slippery beast. While the Charity Commission was enquiring and coming to a decision, the cult had a falll-back position in that it had set up the Australian charity scam (COSRECI).
So despite the Charity Commission refusing to give the cult charity status, the cult has operated as a charity, ever since, in the UK because they had their fall-back position (COSRECI) in place.
The slimy, slippery cult will have a fall-back position set up in case the Senate Enquiry found against them. They will have a "Charity" set up in "Belgravia" or some such foreign safe-haven port.
Question for the Aussies to consider and for Zenophon and the Senate to consider is:
- Do the Government have contingency in place for non-Aussie "charities" operating in Australia?
Anyone, who has read the whole document, know if the foreign "charity" aspect was covered by the report? Is Zenophon aware of the liklihood that the cult will try to use such a loophole?
Basically the point I am trying to make is that governments need to have a position and policy in place for non-domestic "charities" operating in their country.
The COSRECI scam worked well for the cult for many years in the UK. They will repeat this "successful" action again if they can.


Right now people are up in arms about government misuse of money and misspending. . . if people realize what Scientology is, and then realize that it's tax exempt, and how much the government loses, I think there will be an uproar. It will be hard because the US (rightfully) strives to protect freedom of religion . . . that will be a sticking point legally. But I think we'll get our Xenophon, and I think it will become obvious eventually that Scientology is not a "religion" worthy of legal privilege.
. 
