What's new

Reviews and Media on HBO Documentary Going Clear

Karen#1

Gold Meritorious Patron
How interesting that isn't just us, posters and activists that liken the Cult of Scientology to the MOB !

If only they could see how they are viewed in culture....

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/0...old-playbook-in-response-to-new-expose-video/


::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

Excerpt
:

There are few organizations that elicit the combustible mix of disdain, curiosity, horror and sheer confusion quite like Scientology. A “church” whose methodology hews more closely to high-priced self-help seminars than the God-based spirituality of traditional churches, this brainchild of controversial “rainman,” L. Ron Hubbard, truly is the poster-child religion of our modern times. Complete with salacious stories of its highest-profile celebrities, tabloid tit-for-tats in response to media dissention, mob-like retaliation against heretics and “apostates” (as they so often brand their former members), it relies on a response playbook that can always be counted on in the face of journalistic exposé.
 

AnonyMary

Formerly Fooled - Finally Free
How interesting that isn't just us, posters and activists that liken the Cult of Scientology to the MOB !

If only they could see how they are viewed in culture....

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/0...old-playbook-in-response-to-new-expose-video/


::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

Excerpt
:

:) However, the readers should see that the article here was written in 2013 but worth reading because it is very good and happens to be was written by a former scientologist! That's an added plus

Scientology Drags Out Old Playbook In Response To New Exposé (VIDEO)
Author: Lorraine Devon Wilke January 26, 2013 3:34 pm


[..] Surely one of the most difficult things for the uninitiated to understand is how intelligent, well-meaning people ever end up in this organization in the first place. In a Salon interview with L. Ron Hubbard’s great-grandson, Jamie DeWolf, (L. Ron Hubbard’s great-grandson: Scientology is a brainwashing “cult”), the following points are made:

DeWolf said that Scientology leaders “prey on narcissism….[You’re] told you’re a God-like creature.”

DeWolf also explained how Scientology specifically tries to rope in celebrities, though they are often “insulated from the nastier aspects of it.” DeWolf said Elvis Presley turned down an offer to join Scientology.

As a former member, I have to take some issue with his “prey on narcissism” statement. While that might well be the intention of some leaders and recruiters, most people I met and grew to know while in Scientology were not narcissistic in any way. In fact, they there because they were looking for a spiritual path that was vibrant, contemporary and not weighted by the arcane traditions of “old time religion.” They got involved because, in the beginning, it seemed enlightened, hopeful, and exciting. They wanted to help themselves get off drugs, get happier in their lives; handle their families. They wanted to help others, make the world a better place; “clear the planet.” It was only through the experience itself, the slow unfolding of the “technology” and bizarre policies and philosophies, that many were led to an awakening of realization about the hollowness of its many promises, its calculated manipulations, its arrogance and exclusionary practices that often exhibited cruelty and lack of compassion. That is why I got out; why most people I know got out.

Kudos to Lorraine Devon Wilke for speaking up!
 
Last edited:

oneonewasaracecar

Gold Meritorious Patron
Tony Ortega found a Facebook gem from a Radical and posted in today's blog.
http://tonyortega.org/2015/01/31/jon-atack-3/

It is invaluable to look into the mind of a devoted radical Scientologist. Here it is ~~

TONY ORTEGA says
And here’s the Scientologist comment of the day. Over at that Facebook conversation about Alex Gibney’s film we showed you the other day, this amazing statement was added a little later. This, folks, is how a Scientologist explains why he’s not going to see Going Clear…


Scientologist on Facebook :

.
An interesting difference between Time magazine and Scientology is that Time magazine doesn't deny it's history.

It doesn't airbrush people out of old photos like scientology or even photoshop people in to an event to make it appear like there are more people at an event.
 

When I cliked the link I got this warning:

This is probably not the site you are looking for!

You attempted to reach flavorwire.com but you actually reached a site identifying itself as
*.wordpress.com ......................................................................................................................An attacker on your network could be trying to get you to visit a fake (and potentially harmful) version of flavorwire.com

You should not proceed especia
lly if you have not seen this warning before for this site.




......then there was an option to proceed or not....
 
Last edited:

Type4_PTS

Diamond Invictus SP
When I cliked the link I got this warning:

This is probably not the site you are looking for!

You attempted to reach flavorwire.com but you actually reached a site identifying itself as
*.wordpress.com ......................................................................................................................An attacker on your network could be trying to get you to visit a fake (and potentially harmful) version of flavorwire.com

You should not proceed especia
lly if you have not seen this warning before for this site.




......then there was an option to proceed or not....


I got similar warnings when trying to access this site.
 

Lulu Belle

Moonbat
http://www.theguardian.com/film/201...-attacks-film-critics-going-clear-documentary


Church of Scientology attacks film critics over Going Clear documentary


Various reviewers of Alex Gibney’s documentary, which speaks to defectors from Scientology, have been contacted with emails demanding they include comment from the Church

(excerpt)


The Church of Scientology has started contacting film critics who have reviewed Alex Gibney’s documentary Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief.

In the film, Gibney outlines the inception and growth of the religion founded by L Ron Hubbard in 1953, which features an exotic mythology and unusual spirituality based around transcending earlier trauma. Gibney interviews defectors from the religion, including Crash director Paul Haggis, and paints its significant figures, like Tom Cruise and leader David Miscavige, in a negative light.

Reviewers of the film, from Us Weekly to Buzzfeed and the Huffington Post, have received an email which reads:

The above article concerning Going Clear, Alex Gibney’s film, was posted without contacting the Church for comment. As a result, your article reflects the film which is filled with bald faced lies. I ask that you include a statement from the Church in your article. There is another side to the story which has to be told. Do not be the mouthpiece for Alex Gibney’s propaganda.

The spokesperson, Karin Pouw, also included an official Church of Scientology statement on the documentary, reading in part: “The accusations made in the film are entirely false and alleged without ever asking the Church... Gibney’s sources are the usual collection of obsessive, disgruntled former Church members kicked out as long as 30 years ago for malfeasance, who have a documented history of making up lies about the Church for money.”
 

secretiveoldfag

Silver Meritorious Patron
From Indiwire, commenting on Karen Pouw's latest email attacking critics:

But what’s interesting about this tactic — aside from the fact that it somehow doesn’t include the phrase, “Actually, it’s about ethics in Scientology journalism” — is how neatly it comports with the film’s portrayal of the Church as a hive of shady, paranoid control freaks. The assumption is that they merely have to email film writers, chastise them for not doing something that’s never been done in the history of film criticism, and get them to run their “Rolling Stone, though!” response with the unblinking acceptance of an OT I — or, perhaps more accurately, of an outlet terrified of the notoriously litigious organization. (HBO announced they’d lawyered up all the way back in November.)
 
Last edited:

Free to shine

Shiny & Free
http://www.theguardian.com/film/201...-attacks-film-critics-going-clear-documentary


Church of Scientology attacks film critics over Going Clear documentary


Various reviewers of Alex Gibney’s documentary, which speaks to defectors from Scientology, have been contacted with emails demanding they include comment from the Church

...



I love Gibney's reply:

Responding to the Church’s tactics, Gibney told Flavorwire: “Anytime someone writes something — film criticism or social criticism — about Scientology, the Church of Scientology counter-attacks by smearing critics. But a careful investigation of the church’s claims will reveal that most of the misdeeds by critics (Rathbun, et al) were committed on behalf of the Church of Scientology! As you saw in the film, these people are now repenting and the Church of Scientology wants to punish them for it.”
 

eldritch cuckoo

brainslugged reptilian


aynwrong said:
Maybe Tom Cruise can descend via grappling hook into the offices of HBO and steal the documentary before it airs. That is, should he choose to accept this mission. Naturally the CoS will disavow any knowledge of his existence should he be captured.

This post will self destruct in 5 seconds.


http://thedailybanter.com/2015/02/s...-film-critics-going-clear/#comment-1833693760

:hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical:
 

eldritch cuckoo

brainslugged reptilian
And delusions of grandeur is one of the symptoms of paranoia.

Remember OSA, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that the truth isn't out to find your ruin.

:yes:


Note to self. Gummy bears ... no safe food while reading ESMB.
*gasp* :omg:
 
Top