I had
also often pondered when a being actually takes over control of the body. I was realizing I thought it was OK to terminate a pregnancy
if the being wasn't totally
settled in yet. Then I realized this was a completely arbitrary issue. :confused2: As a newbie Scio reading Theta/Mest theory..
I had always felt that I had gotten trapped in the 'net' surrounding the Earth and ended up
back on the human treadmill after engaging in spiritual practices to
escape. Initially entering Scientology I felt the mest body was a mechanism designed to entrap the theta being.
Later I discovered that a lot of individuals on upper levels thought bodies were a
hot commodity and you had to be ABLE in order to
get to be the one "in charge."
I had
several shifts in viewpoint regarding
bodies in my auditing as the years went by. At one point I realized that my own past life stored ''identity"
energies were on these beams that were anchored into the etheric structure of my body.
I build a body with them.
These past life masses seem to form somewhat of an auto-engineering facility. Something I do a
Not-Know about. It remains on automatic for me. This was interesting to me.
I worked for years in conjunction with dancers who often used abortion as a means of birth control. One girl had several each year. Today, the
morning after pill is available over the counter. It puts the uterus in a condition to slough off anything there. Some bleeding involved.
Natural spontaneous abortions are quite common and some do not emit strong emotion when they suspect they've just lost a 2 week old fetus in the commode. Its just 'nature doing its thing because the timing wasn't right'.
My mother is strongly anti-abortion. She leads a rather militant group of Catholics and organizes demonstrations in Bosnia for the rights of the unborn..She protests "the slaughter of the innocents."
I have several friends and 2 ex-employers who have mentally handicapped children. The child across the street has extreme retardation from lack of oxygen in the womb. Every member of these families has had their life modified.
As a bartender employed at a large Hilton in a once degraded area of town, I saw many families come in who
should not have had the care of an infant entrusted to them. I winced. I have seen so many things that have triggered so many emotions in me on the subject of abortion.
I personally witnessed the abuses and the downside of keeping unwanted children more than the upside while there.
On an opposite note...working at Walt Disney World for a decade I saw many suburban Christian families who brought with them special needs infants taken in by them as foster parents. I saw the agenda of each family member on their vacation change their daily schedule... structured around the caring for the foster child. That is an impressive LOVE there, I tell you.
As a 'died in the wool' Scio you
know what the viewpoint on that would've been.
On the processing questions: What should you
confront? What should another
confront? What should others
confront? I realized that whatever one has to occupy a viewpoint of dimension
opposite of ___is basically controlling his 'beingnesss'. Space is Beingness. In other words, if you give someone an
unsolvable problem, you are putting them in a position where they must confront the item... Their viewpoint of dimension will now be in juxtaposition to the
problem. When a family adds an infant, someone's viewpoint is finaggled into the 'confront' problem solving strata. Life is a problem.
Recently statistics have shown increasingly severe domestic violence against women in the home while pregnant . The situation makes some feel trapped to this extent.
I am so very pro choice. But I cannot tell you how many beautiful bouncing babies I see at Disney who look 'natural clear'. These infants are so much MORE than Darwin's developing genetics
To look at them and think the concept '
abortion'.... leaves me speachless.
Here getting born does not equate with "to suffer".