When I was in the cult I was simply told he was a psychotic. Oh, OK...no need to find out anymore.
TP
Obviously a 'former' Scientologist would be psychotic by definition
Hmm... wonder why....
Zinj
When I was in the cult I was simply told he was a psychotic. Oh, OK...no need to find out anymore.
TP
Obviously a 'former' Scientologist would be psychotic by definition
Hmm... wonder why....
Zinj
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne.../story-e6freuyi-1225856636066?from=public_rss
RUSSIA is set to ban dozens of texts and recordings by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard.
The problem I see is that Russian freezoners will now have no access to those books anymore - at least not legally. Of course assuming that "ban" means banned for possession, not just banned for sale. So they can't give any newcomers FoT or DMSMH anymore.
Does anyone know of any books tht suggest violence against critics? Perhaps a pamphlet?
Probably the most honest Scientology expression on the subject is found in confidential issues, flag orders, 'advices' etc., however, even taking *early* Scientology publicly published 'dogma', such as 'Science of Survival' supports the worst of the claims and worse.
Zinj
-snip-
This sounds like Fair Game stuff, which is limited, unless quotes used in promo. Science of Survival does not state anythng about critis and using violence.
"Materials on Scientology by Ron Hubbard have been found extremist and will be banned from distribution in Russia,"
Too extremist for Mother Russia
1951:
What to do with those below 2.0 on the Tone Scale? (easily identified by their continued critical attitude towards Dianetics/Scientology and Hubbard): "Dispose of quietly and without sorrow."
1951: What to do with those below 2.0 on the Tone Scale? (easily identified by their continued critical attitude towards Dianetics/Scientology and Hubbard): "Dispose of quietly and without sorrow."
1951: What to do with those below 2.0 on the Tone Scale? (easily identified by their continued critical attitude towards Dianetics/Scientology and Hubbard): "Dispose of quietly and without sorrow."
Well, it is a truncated quote ie. it's missing the first half of the sentence, that may be why you "missed it" or found it to be "harmless".thanks so much for pointing out those few EVIL words pronounced so early - amazing how they can slide under yr radar as HARMLESS when it suited - which reminds me of how they, & many more examples, can continue to slide under Terrill Park's radar ALL THE CURRENT TIME!