What's new

Scientology CAUSES mental illness

lotus

stubborn rebel sheep!
Random thoughts…



I have experience with both auditing and therapy from psychotherapists and a psychologist. The therapists I have worked with have all been highly trained, strictly supervised and regularly update themselves with training, etc. Modern therapy is very fluid and workable. That has been my experience.

.....

Good therapy helps an individual get real with themselves and life. Something that scientology has zero need for.

I snipped

I like how you compared therapies, mindfulness and $cientology based on your experiences and knowledge.

I would also have said pretty much the same from personal experience with all.

A short behavioral therapy is often very much effective in many situations, and yes, the therapist is pretty much happy to release you and say '' hey, I wish you the very best''
This is the confirmation you get stronger and now can fly alone.
$camology only succed in creating a compulsive need and more and more dependance to auditing and pseudo-cognitions - which weakens more and more the addicted who finds soon ror later, himself in great distress when such auditing is denied to him or may be compromised.
 
Last edited:

anonomog

Gold Meritorious Patron
Perhaps Scientology doesn't cause mental illness but takes away the checks that catch disordered thinking before it becomes serious. It masks it.

Our lady with the bacteria arms and spidery hair. If she was a friend or family member of mine, not in Sci, and she was telling me her wins, I would go through a quick checklist: Something is wrong. Is she normally a little whacky and out there or is this new behaviour? Has she been drinking? Is she on, or changed, medications? What stress is going on in her life?
Is it time for professional help.

Not wanting to invalidate someone's wins, the true for you philosophy is all very nice and polite, open minded and spiritual but unhelpful to the person whose mind is truly slowly breaking down. Same could be said for the person weeping and wailing in a charismatic church wanting to be saved. Touched by God, or touched by depression?
 

Helena Handbasket

Gold Meritorious Patron
While I don't agree with everything said here I do believe the Church of Scientology causes mental illness, particularly in those who have been on staff, especially the Sea Org. See http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?33467-Scientology-Psychosis for my views.

As for myself, I don't consider myself in good shape -- but in much better shape than I was years ago. Although let me be quick to add I mix practices, speculate, and engage in figure-figure to a great degree.

Helena
 

Knows

Gold Meritorious Patron
If only Lisa McPherson were still alive to answer this question. In my opinion Scientology does indeed cause mental illness. It causes one to live in a delusional world that does not really exist outside of the bubble created by the Scientologists themselves.

This is WHY Scientology has you sign lawyered up contracts to never sue if you get worse. Lisa McPherson is a prime example of how bad it can get - Scientology can drive you crazy and they did.

It is sickening that they told the Sea Org Staff that she was a DB. One guy that left the Sea Org told me "he heard she was a DB"...nice Whispering Campaign Scientology. Too bad it did not work. We know your crimes! You drive people insane whilst fleecing them of their family and money.
Scientology is one of the most EVIL CULT'S in existence today!
 

Claire Swazey

Spokeshole, fence sitter
I snipped for brevity.

Sure, there's nothing wrong with two people sitting down talking through life-issues in a supportive mode.

But in scientology, often people are talking through made-up scenarios with pre-defined EPs with many unacceptable topics. I think it was Nibs (Ron De Wolf) that said this - it was done on purpose to mess people up. It feels right, but it is just leading people deeper into a manipulative trap of being under more control.

It's not 'just another methodology' unless the group of methodologies you draw from includes those with evil intent.


Membership and involvement in CofS is never a good idea. When I talk about organizations I say so. I do not refer to organizations as methodologies.
 

Jump

Operating teatime
Membership and involvement in CofS is never a good idea. When I talk about organizations I say so. I do not refer to organizations as methodologies.

Ok, I may have drawn a longer bow on your post than necessary, and thanks for the clarification.

I still think that Hubbard developed levels and processes to primarily ensnare minds in his world of deception rather than to be ultimately helpful.

If I wanted talk therapy on imaginary scenarios, I would seek out a qualified and registered abreaction therapist. Then, at least I could have some confidence in the professionalism, and have someone to complain to in the worst case.

I don't think all manner of methodologies are comparable.



Oh, and 8539 so far today :) You'll know what I mean.
 

Claire Swazey

Spokeshole, fence sitter
Ok, I may have drawn a longer bow on your post than necessary, and thanks for the clarification.

I still think that Hubbard developed levels and processes to primarily ensnare minds in his world of deception rather than to be ultimately helpful.

If I wanted talk therapy on imaginary scenarios, I would seek out a qualified and registered abreaction therapist. Then, at least I could have some confidence in the professionalism, and have someone to complain to in the worst case.

I don't think all manner of methodologies are comparable.



Oh, and 8539 so far today :) You'll know what I mean.


Yah, re Hubbard. You know what resonated with me? The depiction of Lancaster Dodd in The Master. Believed in his methodology/cult etc, thought it would help Johnny but didn't hesitate to rip off that old lady.

Right now, I'm remembering a young woman at the org who'd just completed high school. Scn family. Another Scn'ist, maybe a generation older, was asking her plans. The girl stated that she didn't want to attend college, partly due to the fact that some psychology courses are usually required. The other woman agreed. And, overhearing, I thought, well, hell, I was an 18 year old know it all Scn'ist, too, at one point. But taking psych 101 etc didn't bother me. I just figured, ehhh, so what. I'll disagree with some stuff and I'll do the work, and get the college credit...no biggie.

What is this girl so insecure about? There's a whole big world out there!

That's one of many wrongheaded points of view that Hubbard brought about and inculcated into his adherents with his controlling nature and paranoia.

So, although we probably don't agree on everything on this tech stuff, (well, I don't even agree with my husband about everything. ) this may well be something on which we can agree and perhaps both have seen. This conversation (on this thread, I mean)reminded me of that goofy attitude they have toward college. Probably because that's a pet peeve of mine about Hub and the way they still are.

Aaaand..10k is just around the corner...
 

Jump

Operating teatime
Yah, re Hubbard. You know what resonated with me? The depiction of Lancaster Dodd in The Master. Believed in his methodology/cult etc, thought it would help Johnny but didn't hesitate to rip off that old lady.

Right now, I'm remembering a young woman at the org who'd just completed high school. Scn family. Another Scn'ist, maybe a generation older, was asking her plans. The girl stated that she didn't want to attend college, partly due to the fact that some psychology courses are usually required. The other woman agreed. And, overhearing, I thought, well, hell, I was an 18 year old know it all Scn'ist, too, at one point. But taking psych 101 etc didn't bother me. I just figured, ehhh, so what. I'll disagree with some stuff and I'll do the work, and get the college credit...no biggie.

What is this girl so insecure about? There's a whole big world out there!

That's one of many wrongheaded points of view that Hubbard brought about and inculcated into his adherents with his controlling nature and paranoia.

So, although we probably don't agree on everything on this tech stuff, (well, I don't even agree with my husband about everything. ) this may well be something on which we can agree and perhaps both have seen. This conversation (on this thread, I mean)reminded me of that goofy attitude they have toward college. Probably because that's a pet peeve of mine about Hub and the way they still are.

Aaaand..10k is just around the corner...


Hey I just did psych101 and well, there are a few things in there that are sufficiently different to hubbard's that would raise questions in an intelligent mind. Not allowed. So hubs banned any psychology study because it would interfere with income. There was no interest in personal betterment of the PC. Just like there was no interest in the survival of a PC on the IR so long as it didn't raise a flap interfering with incomes. Just like there was no interest in providing good training so long as people thought it was good, resulting in more cash. It was all a ruse.

Good or bad may occur, but that was irrelevant to Hubbard if the cash flow is there. Thats why I think the entire topic is heavily suspect and dangerous.
 

JustSheila

Crusader
Random thoughts…

:clap: :clap: :clap:

Sallydance, this is terrific.

Now why don't you get it published and get paid for it?

You're far too skilled as a writer to keep writing these gems without compensation.

Why don't you call or write some of the psychology or even new age magazines, get their writer's guidelines, review a few of their mags at a library, tweak it for your audience and sell it?

Why not? It's just about ready to go as it is now, though you might refer to Scientology as a "New Age space opera guru religion" or similar if you were to sell it. Just about anyone would know exactly what religion you're talking about, especially if you included something specific to Scn like Xenu.

Just a thought.
 

sallydannce

Gold Meritorious Patron
:clap: :clap: :clap:

Sallydance, this is terrific.

Now why don't you get it published and get paid for it?

You're far too skilled as a writer to keep writing these gems without compensation.

Why don't you call or write some of the psychology or even new age magazines, get their writer's guidelines, review a few of their mags at a library, tweak it for your audience and sell it?

Why not? It's just about ready to go as it is now, though you might refer to Scientology as a "New Age space opera guru religion" or similar if you were to sell it. Just about anyone would know exactly what religion you're talking about, especially if you included something specific to Scn like Xenu.

Just a thought.

Thanks Sheila. I appreciate your support and kindness. There are various things happening here in the background. My writing is about to take a journey out into the world. I have no idea how it will fare but the journey is being taken regardless of my reluctance of letting it leave home without me. :)

I live in exciting times! :flowers:
 

Type4_PTS

Diamond Invictus SP
:clap: :clap: :clap:

Sallydance, this is terrific.

Now why don't you get it published and get paid for it?

You're far too skilled as a writer to keep writing these gems without compensation.

Why don't you call or write some of the psychology or even new age magazines, get their writer's guidelines, review a few of their mags at a library, tweak it for your audience and sell it?

Why not? It's just about ready to go as it is now, though you might refer to Scientology as a "New Age space opera guru religion" or similar if you were to sell it. Just about anyone would know exactly what religion you're talking about, especially if you included something specific to Scn like Xenu.

Just a thought.


:iagree:

This is excellent! :clap:
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthre...mental-illness&p=938457&viewfull=1#post938457
 

Bee Sting

Patron with Honors
This is WHY Scientology has you sign lawyered up contracts to never sue if you get worse. Lisa McPherson is a prime example of how bad it can get - Scientology can drive you crazy and they did.

It is sickening that they told the Sea Org Staff that she was a DB. One guy that left the Sea Org told me "he heard she was a DB"...nice Whispering Campaign Scientology. Too bad it did not work. We know your crimes! You drive people insane whilst fleecing them of their family and money.
Scientology is one of the most EVIL CULT'S in existence today!

I soo agree.. Scio-Fi-ology is a cult... and YES! "THEY" do drive you crazy.. TRUE! And, do "they" drive people insane? YES! "THEY" do!!

But, let's look at this from this point of view.... SCIO-FI-OLOGY does not CAUSE mental illness. Mental illness is already present in those who have challenges. SCIO-FI-OLOGY PRAYS on those whom are vulnerable and at risk. This "religion" takes advantage and exploit those with elements of inefficiencies. It EXPLOITS them!

Yes, Lisa McPherson was ... insane but not because she was in her mind truly insane. The "insanity" was caused by inhumane and cruel treatment she was subjected to for many years. So, the clarity here is NOT that Scio-fi-ology CAUSED it.. they CREATED it, they created, not caused mental deficiency where a true mental deficiency did not exit in the first place.

The difference is that the scio "technology" teaches their disciples to believe that they "are" insane when in fact the "insanity" is induced by by the "religious" beliefs, the indoctrination of what is, supposedly what is, per LRH's definition of mental illness. So, once the subject (the disciple) is "sold" on this idea and made into to as a "religious" idea of what mental illness is or is not, he/she (the disciple) is pretty much doomed into believing how "faulty" they are but, then of course, LRH teaches he has and know the "only way out" is his way or their is "no way", an absolute no other way other than the way how LRH prescribed it to be = SCI-FI-ology! It is a mental trap!

Scientology and Dianetics does not CAUSE mental illness! They CREATE it... until the person is removed from the environment!!

There is a difference between the causes of mental illness, 1) is the one that is already in the makeup of the person and 2) one caused by the environment. So, yes! IT IS AN EVIL CULT! In cults people have no freedom, no place to think freely and to utter freely their own opinions or thoughts. No room to expand or explore in their own beliefs and think for themselves. Cults leave their "believers" (followers) in a state confusion and bewilderment, cults create "dependency" and "co-dependency" relationships. They CREATE insanity but do not cause it. Cause is its origination, create is making it. THEY MAKE it!

Honey Love,

Bee Sting
 

programmer_guy

True Ex-Scientologist
That is one symptom of schizophrenia.

Also, so-called "going exterior" is really one symptom of "dissociation".

SCN OT "home universe" = "my own world" (yet another symptom of schizophrenia).

And I read, a long time ago about Hubbard, in later life, screaming about his BTs.
 
Last edited:

Claire Swazey

Spokeshole, fence sitter
People who dabble irresponsibly in the occult often end up more fucked up than when they started. One can study various esoteric things, but being irresponsible and stupid about it will generally fuck 'em up.
 

Jump

Operating teatime
People who dabble irresponsibly in the occult often end up more fucked up than when they started. One can study various esoteric things, but being irresponsible and stupid about it will generally fuck 'em up.

And it will fuck with the sanity of people who are drawn into it by the wannabe adept, especially those that don't know it is occult in the first place.
 

anonomog

Gold Meritorious Patron
People who dabble irresponsibly in the occult often end up more fucked up than when they started. One can study various esoteric things, but being irresponsible and stupid about it will generally fuck 'em up.

People who dabble in the occult are already travelling through the suburbs of fucked up and heading towards the city centre, when the guru bus picks them up and gets them there faster.
Even on the very lightest level, no one goes to a tea-leaf reader if their thoughts/mind are 100% steady and life is going well.
And we have all been there. The lucky few miss the bus.

I'm not sure how to define the difference between responsible and irresponsible when dabbling in the occult. You could warn me to be careful when playing with the ouija board, but what does careful mean? When does it become irresponsible? How do we know?

ernie-prang-pa.jpg
 
I soo agree.. Scio-Fi-ology is a cult... and YES! "THEY" do drive you crazy.. TRUE! And, do "they" drive people insane? YES! "THEY" do!!

But, let's look at this from this point of view.... SCIO-FI-OLOGY does not CAUSE mental illness. Mental illness is already present in those who have challenges. SCIO-FI-OLOGY PRAYS on those whom are vulnerable and at risk. This "religion" takes advantage and exploit those with elements of inefficiencies. It EXPLOITS them!

Yes, Lisa McPherson was ... insane but not because she was in her mind truly insane. The "insanity" was caused by inhumane and cruel treatment she was subjected to for many years. So, the clarity here is NOT that Scio-fi-ology CAUSED it.. they CREATED it, they created, not caused mental deficiency where a true mental deficiency did not exit in the first place.

The difference is that the scio "technology" teaches their disciples to believe that they "are" insane when in fact the "insanity" is induced by by the "religious" beliefs, the indoctrination of what is, supposedly what is, per LRH's definition of mental illness. So, once the subject (the disciple) is "sold" on this idea and made into to as a "religious" idea of what mental illness is or is not, he/she (the disciple) is pretty much doomed into believing how "faulty" they are but, then of course, LRH teaches he has and know the "only way out" is his way or their is "no way", an absolute no other way other than the way how LRH prescribed it to be = SCI-FI-ology! It is a mental trap!

Scientology and Dianetics does not CAUSE mental illness! They CREATE it... until the person is removed from the environment!!

There is a difference between the causes of mental illness, 1) is the one that is already in the makeup of the person and 2) one caused by the environment. So, yes! IT IS AN EVIL CULT! In cults people have no freedom, no place to think freely and to utter freely their own opinions or thoughts. No room to expand or explore in their own beliefs and think for themselves. Cults leave their "believers" (followers) in a state confusion and bewilderment, cults create "dependency" and "co-dependency" relationships. They CREATE insanity but do not cause it. Cause is its origination, create is making it. THEY MAKE it!

Honey Love,

Bee Sting

puh-leased...

good chrizstians PRAY on the vulnerable

scifiologollygee PREYS on them...
 
i'm a cabbie...

if you missed the bus i can get you where yer goin'...

hmmm...

that busdriver could be my brother

riders who tip with doobies are preferred customer list


p.s. R.I.P. steve gaskin...
 

Claire Swazey

Spokeshole, fence sitter
People who dabble in the occult are already travelling through the suburbs of fucked up and heading towards the city centre, when the guru bus picks them up and gets them there faster.
Even on the very lightest level, no one goes to a tea-leaf reader if their thoughts/mind are 100% steady and life is going well.
And we have all been there. The lucky few miss the bus.

I'm not sure how to define the difference between responsible and irresponsible when dabbling in the occult. You could warn me to be careful when playing with the ouija board, but what does careful mean? When does it become irresponsible? How do we know?

ernie-prang-pa.jpg

I had a cool book once- it was put out by some esoteric publisher in a series called something like "What they don't want you to know". Every chapter was about a different occultist. Almost all these people were terribly messed up. And I've met others who seemed to be that way. I'm also mindful of Nikki Sixx's experiments with same. It seems to me that delving deep into some types of occultism, particularly left hand path stuff seems to take a toll on some people's psyches. I'm talking about intense involvement and experimentation. I think Hub believed his own stuff. I think he delved deeply into the space alien bt stuff, so much so that he got consumed with it and that this is one of the reasons he died raving about demons.

I also- and this is something that, believe it or not, Scn -among other ologies- covers (though they cheerfully disregard it) - irresponsibility and cupidity and misdeeds take their toll on people, too. I think that this is the other thing that fucked Hubbard up. And maybe other Scientologists, too. The ones who RPF people and sneer at them. The ones who reg all their money. They ones who run Scn companies and fire employees for going into labor. The ones who break up families and slap women (thinking of Maria Pia Gardini) in the face for not coughing up a huge donation. Unethical, immoral, greedy and irresponsible behavior.

Carlos Castaneda appears to have been like that, too. He seems to have flat out lied about Don Juan. Made it up. Though he does seem to have truly been into occultism and shamanism. But he was irresponsible with others and there are some bizarre tales about him. Thus can someone be a true believer and a charlantan. (he has this in common w/ Hubbard.)

I know that I've gotten flak for saying stuff like this before (and I've stopped responding to the ones who try to take me to task for it) but I, in fact, don't think that auditing, per se (or word clearing or TRs or other drills) fucks people up. I think anyone who is too fragile for that is someone who'd not handle most psychoanalysis verywell, either. I think people are, in general (in Scn) driven nuts by all the mixed signals, screaming, abuse and incredible losses that being involved in CofS so often causes. I was thinking about this today and seems to me that if I were going to find one generalized nut shell term for the ill consequences suffered by Scn'ists from being involved in CofS, it would be "loss". Loss of health, of money, of homes, of family- even their lives.

Now, back to occultism messing one up. I think that there are things that "restimulate" (I like the word, dammit, even though it's a scn one) or stir things up within a person's psyche that sometimes they can't handle. I also suspect that there's a lack of balance thing with those who get messed up by it, cuz those are the people who aren't doing enough other things to balance it out.
 

Claire Swazey

Spokeshole, fence sitter
i'm a cabbie...

if you missed the bus i can get you where yer goin'...

hmmm...

that busdriver could be my brother

riders who tip with doobies are preferred customer list


p.s. R.I.P. steve gaskin...

Gaskin's finally dead, huh? Well, he doesn't get much of a free pass from me. I have family who were founding members of that cult, though not in the sense that he was. They wasted years and ended up with nothing because of his bad advice. Because he was born with money- and never lost it- he was sitting pretty when he decided to move on.

One of the stories I heard about him was that for a time he wanted people in his commune not to wear glasses- mind over matter or something. (Penn and Teller would have a field day with this and I suspect that they'd be right). Then when he found he needed glasses, ohhh, never mind! :yes:
 
Top