Finally we have the publications:
Dr. Wesley Muhammad Books and Scholarly Papers by Dr. Wesley Muhammad
Understanding the Assault on the Black Man,
Black Manhood and Black Masculinity (Paperback)
This is Dr. Wesley Muhammad’s newest work. In this book he shines light on various aspects of the hidden architecture of White Supremacy’s global project of un-manning the Black male and the spoiling of the Black female. Learn, among other things:
The role European Christian cannibalism, soul harvesting and homosexuality played in the subjugation of Black people during colonial expansion and American slavery, particularly the Black male.
How European pseudo-science and then American science went to work to make African peoples and the Black American male “The Lady of the Races.”
How Presidents Nixon, Reagan, Bush, and Clinton all waged government-funded wars against Black males.
How the inner-city “Thug” and the Black “Sissy” were both scientifically produced.
The esoteric and theological background of White Supremacy’s Assault on the Black Man
The deeper truth behind the "Autism Conspiracy" against Black boys
How the CIA manipulated marijuana and created crack cocaine in order to create Black Zombies in the inner cities.
Here's this:
Bilad al-Sudan is a companion volume to Black Arabia and the African Origin of Islam. A collection of distinct essays written since the publication of Black Arabia, Bilad al-Sudan offers:
Further evidence that the Arabs of the first Muslim community of 7th century Arabia were an Africoid people.
A correction to the mistaken belief that the pre-Islamic Arabs were white and racist, as seen by their alleged treatment of Bilal, Companion of the Prophet Muhammad.
A refutation of recent Muslim attempts to defend the White Supremacist paradigm in Islam.
A critical analysis of Afrocentric discourse on Islam.
An introduction to a new paradigm: Ma’atic Islam.
Here's this:
Rah IZ Allah: Why Asar Imhotep Is Wrong
In my 2009 publication Black Arabia and the African Origin of Islam I advanced a novel argument: that the well-known Egyptian sun god Rah actually originated across (east of) the Red Sea in Afrabia (i.e. Black Arabia) and that the name of this deity was in fact an Egyptianization of the Proto-Semitic Alah. My argument was based on the following: (1) the late documented appearance of Rah in Egyptian records (Third Dynasty reign of Djoser, 2635-2610 BCE or Fifth Dynasty 2400-2300 BCE); (2) the possibility that the center of Rah’s worship in Egypt, the city Annu (Greek ‘Heliopolis’), was actually founded by Black Arabian migrants (Anu); and (3) the linguistic convergence of the Proto-Semitic and Egyptian names.
Our “Rah is Allah” thesis has recently been submitted to a lengthy critical review by Asar Imhotep (2013), who rejects the claims we advanced in 2009. After an extensive, largely linguistic exploration of the Egyptian Rah and Semitic Allah in the context of African linguistic tradition, Imhotep contends that, in contrast to my suggestion that Allah and Rah are etymologically related, Imhotep claims that they are distinct and unrelated: Rah the sun god is contrasted with Allah the rain god.
In this Response I demonstrate that, despite Imhotep’s lengthy objection, he is wrong: the identity of Rah and Allah is in fact rooted in etymology. I argue here, contra Imhotep, that the (Proto-) Semitic Allah is a dialectical cognate of the Egyptian Rah and that both (the Semitic Allah and Egyptian Rah) derive from a pre-dialectical para-African root (Ala) that is closer to the Semitic Allah than to the Egyptian Rah.
I'm out of time: however, this is right in line with the other two posts.
Afrocentricism has been refuted by historians everywhere...black and white. The ancient egyptians were more closely related to eruopeans by DNA evidence. The wheel never existed in sub Sahara Africa. Afrocentric theories state that Socrates was black...everything good came from blacks and were robbed from them by other races...mostly whites.
He is stating that Rah was actually Allah and, by the extension of Afrocentric theory, claiming the Ancient Egyptian dynasties and culture were taken from blacks...a false narrative.
I'm pressed for time so I apologize for the posts if they are incoherent. There's enough groundwork here laid for one to do their own inspection as to the serious woo that is presented in these works.
All of it is so falsified and has been refuted with documented anthropological data...but that doesn't matter with critical race theory, etc. Facts do NOT matter.