I have to say, Zinj, that I LMAO while trying to keep a straight face reading your post, and simultaneously looking at your rotating antenna.
Thank Paul.. He asked me if I could do it and so I tried it and, once tried, why not ?
Zinj
I have to say, Zinj, that I LMAO while trying to keep a straight face reading your post, and simultaneously looking at your rotating antenna.
It's entirely possible that we have missed some basic mathematical insight, and are thereby limited in our science. Sometimes this thought keeps me awake at night.
That is the gamma function you moron, that is the equation to explain the strong nuclear force.
They're different equations for the same phenomenon, both describe the strong nuclear force.
I don't know why there is no way to calculate the circumference of a circle exactly — that is, to compute pi exactly — except that in fact hardly anything can be calculated exactly.
Pi is by no means unique in being uncomputable (transcendental). Most numbers are transcendental. What do we mean by 'calculate,' anyway? I think we simply mean that there is some set of simple operations we do to get one number from some others. So then maybe it's not surprising that this is a rare and special case. Most things just aren't simple.
Calling π "1" instead of "π" changes nothing. Relabelling is not simplicity.