Tony's announced a big day tomorrow
Live blogging of the Rathbun proceedings ?
I'm excited without really knowing why...
Sidney18511 • 25 minutes ago
I think that the midget would rip out his own EYEBALLS before he would give one thin dime to Marty.
http://tonyortega.org/2013/09/12/li...porary-injunction-hearing/#comment-1040186994
September 14, 2013
Judge to rule in Narconon Arrowhead case this week
By Jeanne LeFlore Staff Writer
- See more at: http://mcalesternews.com/local/x865779274/Judge-to-rule-in-Narconon-Arrowhead-case-this-week
Judge to rule on whether Narconon Arrowhead must produce employee related documents in the negligence case of Heather Landmeier case out of OK. Of course, the cult is fighting it.
Most important matter because Plaintiff claims that staff gave Heather Landmeier drugs when she was in the program and she is now in a vegetable state after they dumped her at a motel during an overdose. Records requested include those of staff relapses and such. Article gives history of problems there including deaths and many other lawsuits ongoing for Negligence, Fraud and Wrongful Death
Quick question - I just read the article and am unclear: the hearing's set for Wednesday @ 10:00 AND the Judge really expected to rule on that day, too? Is the hearing not truly a traditional hearing (with arguments presented) -- rather, it's just the format opted-for by the Judge to opine on the record from the bench?
JB (It's going on the calendar either way - just want to understand a bit better, sorry.)
A judge is set to rule this week if Narconon Arrowhead will have to produce documents related to incidents of drug and alcohol use by its staff, according to court documents.
A hearing is set for 10 a.m. Wednesday in Pittsburg County District Court in the lawsuit against Narconon filed on behalf of a Narconon graduate now in a vegetative state after overdosing on heroin and oxycontin. - See more at: http://mcalesternews.com/local/x865...Arrowhead-case-this-week#sthash.LMlqLFI4.dpuf
08/21/2013 F&E PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFT. NARCONON OF OKLA., INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS RELATED TO INCIDENTS OF DRUG OR ALCOHOL USE BY RESIDENTS AND/OR EMPLOYEES
08/23/2013 F&E ORDER (9-18-13 AT 10 AM) S/BLAND
Hearings:
09/18/2013 10:00am MOTION TO COMPEL
This thread really should be in the Legal and Government Actions against Scientology section, and be made a sticky so it can be easily found and updated.
http://www.forum.exscn.net/forumdisplay.php?99-Legal-and-Government-Actions-against-Scientology
Perhaps a message from the OP to a Mod about this should be made. It can be made as 'report post' with asking for this, with a link to the OP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DemurrerA demurrer is a pleading in a lawsuit that objects to or challenges a pleading filed by an opposing party. The word demur means "to object"; a demurrer is the document that makes the objection. Lawyers informally define a demurrer as a defendant saying, "So what?" to the pleading.
Typically, the defendant in a case will demur to the complaint, but it is also possible for plaintiff to demur to an answer. The demurrer challenges the legal sufficiency of a claim, cause of action, or to the defenses set forth in an answer.
Thanks JBWriter for posting in that section about this thread.
Here is another upcoming hearing on all 3 cases. A Demurrer to the plaintiffs' Amended Complaints
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demurrer
Case Number: BC481342
ANISE EVANS VS NARCONON OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ET AL
Case Number: BC481302
HARRIS EVANS VS NARCONON OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ET AL
Case Number: PC052807
NICO GALLION VS. NARCONON OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Future Hearings
10/25/2013 at 08:30 am in department 53 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Conference-Case Management(2. DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 2X(matters cont from 08-16-13)RELATED BC481302 & PC052807)[/B]
UPDATE: on the below cases
Case Number: BC481342
ANISE EVANS VS NARCONON OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ET AL
(Same applies to the other 2 cases, BC481302 & PC052807 )
Future Hearings
12/20/2013 at 08:30 am in department 53 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Conference-Case Management(2. DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 2X(matters cont from 10-25-13)RELATED BC481302 & PC052807)
___________
re: Oct 25th hearing:
10/17/2013 Notice of Continuance (combined demurrer hearings & case management conference & stay of discovery pending third mediation; )
Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt