What's new

Scientology recovery program

jerryf25

Patron
I developed an additional recovery tool that I call a Life Chart. Started working on it in the 1980s. It evolved partly from a scn study tech concept:

“When were you last doing well in your studies?”

becomes

“When were you last doing really well in life?”


follow-up questions are in this essay:

“When Were You Most Successful In Life?”
http://gemini6.110mb.com/Lifechart.htm


Doing this type of “know thyself” work helped me identify common themes and characteristics from the most and least successful periods in my life.

Jerry
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
I developed an additional recovery tool that I call a Life Chart. Started working on it in the 1980s. It evolved partly from a scn study tech concept:

“When were you last doing well in your studies?”

becomes

“When were you last doing really well in life?”


follow-up questions are in this essay:

“When Were You Most Successful In Life?”
http://gemini6.110mb.com/Lifechart.htm


Doing this type of “know thyself” work helped me identify common themes and characteristics from the most and least successful periods in my life.

Jerry

Good idea. As a course sup, I found that the most effective method of debugging a student, bar none.

Applying it to life generally, I would suggest:

1. When were you doing well in life?
2. When did you cease to do well in life?
3. Just before you ceased to do well in life, what changed?

There can be more than one series of answers, of course. So the (2) question would have to relate to the same period as the (1) question.

Asking "When were you last ____?" is asking the person to compute more than one thing at the same time, and can be too complex to figure out.

Paul
 

jerryf25

Patron
Here is the URL for the current version of the scientology recovery program.

http://gemini6.onlinewebshop.net/scnrec01.htm

I recently added a link in it to Paul Adams’ much appreciated pdf compilation of Alan Walter’s ESMB posts. Intimidating length (over 700 pages) but worth the effort to learn more about Alan’s insights on helping former CofS members, LRH’s behavior, and the 1960s downward spiral of scientology.

Most of my recovery program was written before I had read anything by Alan. Am enjoying studying and applying his data relevant to recovery such as:

  • Identifying and living one’s prime dream
  • His version of what a Life Repair should be
  • How the scn tech and training I was exposed to had been restructured by LRH to reduce client gains
Jerry
 

AnonyMary

Formerly Fooled - Finally Free
Here is the URL for the current version of the scientology recovery program.

http://gemini6.onlinewebshop.net/scnrec01.htm

I recently added a link in it to Paul Adams’ much appreciated pdf compilation of Alan Walter’s ESMB posts. Intimidating length (over 700 pages) but worth the effort to learn more about Alan’s insights on helping former CofS members, LRH’s behavior, and the 1960s downward spiral of scientology.

Most of my recovery program was written before I had read anything by Alan. Am enjoying studying and applying his data relevant to recovery such as:

  • Identifying and living one’s prime dream
  • His version of what a Life Repair should be
  • How the scn tech and training I was exposed to had been restructured by LRH to reduce client gains
Jerry

That is excellent, Jerry! I really enjoyed reading your program, your story and your posts here. I shall certainly suggest your program to the wavering and newly out! I didn't realize you have been posting since 2007!

Best wishes,

Mary
 

Infinite

Troublesome Internet Fringe Dweller
Here is the URL for the current version of the scientology recovery program.

http://gemini6.onlinewebshop.net/scnrec01.htm

I recently added a link in it to Paul Adams’ much appreciated pdf compilation of Alan Walter’s ESMB posts. Intimidating length (over 700 pages) but worth the effort to learn more about Alan’s insights on helping former CofS members, LRH’s behavior, and the 1960s downward spiral of scientology.

Most of my recovery program was written before I had read anything by Alan. Am enjoying studying and applying his data relevant to recovery such as:

  • Identifying and living one’s prime dream
  • His version of what a Life Repair should be
  • How the scn tech and training I was exposed to had been restructured by LRH to reduce client gains
Jerry

Nice one, Jerry. I've got your site bookmarked for future reference in comments concerning this sort of thing. The only suggestion I have would be to include something along the lines of "observing one's language" and, where possible, to translate Scientologese into plain English (or what ever the person's native tongue is).
 

AnonyMary

Formerly Fooled - Finally Free
Nice one, Jerry. I've got your site bookmarked for future reference in comments concerning this sort of thing. The only suggestion I have would be to include something along the lines of "observing one's language" and, where possible, to translate Scientologese into plain English (or what ever the person's native tongue is).

If a person from another country that does not use English as a primary language, all the have to do is go to www.google.com and in the search box put the webpage url in and click search. Then click Translate top left of the search results

Here is the url http://gemini6.onlinewebshop.net/scnrec01.htm
 

Veda

Sponsor
Here is the URL for the current version of the scientology recovery program.

http://gemini6.onlinewebshop.net/scnrec01.htm

I recently added a link in it to Paul Adams’ much appreciated pdf compilation of Alan Walter’s ESMB posts. Intimidating length (over 700 pages) but worth the effort to learn more about Alan’s insights on helping former CofS members, LRH’s behavior, and the 1960s downward spiral of scientology.

Most of my recovery program was written before I had read anything by Alan. Am enjoying studying and applying his data relevant to recovery such as:

  • Identifying and living one’s prime dream
  • His version of what a Life Repair should be
  • How the scn tech and training I was exposed to had been restructured by LRH to reduce client gains
Jerry

Thanks much :). This looks extremely interesting!


By the way, Jerryf25 is also the one who started the Sole Source Myth thread:

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?510-The-Sole-Source-Myth
 

jerryf25

Patron

I changed #16 in the Recovery Program to this:

Acknowledge the identities you took on as a CofS member. Understand how the scientology culture was structured to negate people’s previous identities and substitute controllable, exploitable ones. My primary identity as a Sea Org member was a Hubbard robot. Claim healthy, self-chosen identities and roles. Idenics is a good source of information on identities.​


Until recently, I was having difficulty reclaiming a pre-scientology identity that I enjoyed in the 1970s (musician – trombonist). :yes:


Jerry
 

La La Lou Lou

Crusader

I changed #16 in the Recovery Program to this:

Acknowledge the identities you took on as a CofS member. Understand how the scientology culture was structured to negate people’s previous identities and substitute controllable, exploitable ones. My primary identity as a Sea Org member was a Hubbard robot. Claim healthy, self-chosen identities and roles. Idenics is a good source of information on identities.​


Until recently, I was having difficulty reclaiming a pre-scientology identity that I enjoyed in the 1970s (musician – trombonist). :yes:


Jerry

To get me to give up my life path two people had to work on me for hours to totally negate my goals. The world will end if we don't make this work.
Your talents are useless, your goals pointless........ give up!
Everything paled in comparison to the goal of preserving all life on this planet and sector of the universe. Finding a goal that was bigger was impossible, but eventually I realised that it was pure bollocks, shuffling papers and doing pointless admin was not going to change anything, OT's are powerless, the admin, teck and essex are worth less than used bubblegum. Hubbard's lifework was not able to change mankind in any way shape or form, he died and he lied all along, he wasn't moving on to target two and who ever had grabbed power was doing it for power and possibly money not for altruism.

1. Get out,
2. stay out
3. get back to being me.
 

jerryf25

Patron

I added a section on scientology ethics to my page of recovery ideas:


Introduction to Scientology Ethics

Being able to lie effectively is considered a virtue in some scientology organizations, including upper level management. Giving false testimony in court is considered justified if it will help protect the CofS or harm critics of scientology. “Training Routine—Lying” (TR-L) is a training exercise used to develop the ability to lie convincingly. You can find many examples of pro-scientology lies when comparing public statements made by church spokespersons with what they say after leaving the cult and are no longer pressured to conceal the truth.

“The greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics
This is Hubbard’s variation of a phrase associated with utilitarianism (The greatest good for the greatest number). Related quotes by Jeremy Bentham, founder of utilitariansim:

  • The greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation.
  • It is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong.

Hubbard’s version was convenient for manipulating people into violating standards of decency. The “greatest good” rationale was used to encourage staff members to accept lack of time off, low pay, and lack of companionship on the grounds that self-deprivation and family deprivation were more than balanced by the good the individual was accomplishing by helping the CofS and all of mankind.

Overts and Amends
The CofS takes the concepts of confessional and restitution for wrongdoing to ridiculous extremes. Yet, there can be value and peace of mind in admitting to oneself incidents when one acted in violation of personal values and then following up with action to make up for any harm done. This is not a healthy process when a person accepts the CofS definitions of what is and is not a harmful act.

Examples of actions that former members may have felt were ethical while under the influence of the CofS:

  • Encouraging people to go into debt to purchase CofS auditing or training
  • Trying to prevent people from leaving the sea org through persuasion or physical force
  • Harming critics of scientology
  • Neglecting one’s personal health
  • Denying oneself and others companionship and family closeness
  • Pressuring pregnant staff members to have an abortion


Pete Griffiths : “I got people into Scientology, I regret this. I must do something to make amends.”


Jerry
 

$oul Reaper

Patron
Well I think part of recovering is to learn all about health and nutrition so you can learn the truths about why one gets into physical difficulties and the theories of aging and the gifts nature has given us to slow, stop or reverse some of these aging aspects and diseases.

Also I think studying real science as opposed to something some ugly con artist made up to make himself important will quickly make you realize how phony everything Ron said and did was.
 

HASbeen

Patron
Originally Posted by TheSneakster

This is the most often repeated complete noncomprehension of Scientology and Scientologists I have seen in this and any other forum or venue.

No true Scientologist believes one single bit of the very large body of theoretical principles and specific techniques what we collectively call "The Tech" merely because Ron Hubbard wrote it or said it in a lecture.

One is expected to apply each bit of theory or technique in Real Life(tm) to oneself and those around oneself and personally observe for oneself whether or not any given bit works as stated and produces the stated result.

Certainty that any given piece of The Tech works when applied as stated then comes from one's own direct experience and not Hubbard's say-so, so if what Ron Hubbard said or wrote about some Scientology principle or technique is actually wrong or false or incomplete, that will show up when it fails in attempted application.

One of the major reasons the majority of true Scientologists have left the C of $, is that the leadership and it's enforcement arm, the Sea Organization, have sought to enforce blind faith and belief upon all the membership in place of the "let me try that out and see if it works for myself" that results in genuine certainty.

I reckon Hubbard himself is largely to blame for that, as his Keeping Scientology Working, Technical Degrades and similar organizational policies pretty much compel Churchies to attack anyone who says some bit of Scientology "tech" doesn't work for them. The issuance of these policies constituted a direct attack on a Scientologist's Freedom of Thought and right to gain true Certainty, in my opinion and mark the exact point in time when the C of $ became a "cult" and cast aside their own definition of Scientology as an "applied religious philosophy".

As soon as any true Scientologist finds out that the C of $ is actively attempting to destroy their Freedom of Thought, as well as their Freedom of Speech, they leave it. Some of them end up here.

Michael "The Sneakster" Hobson
I am *not* anonymous.

I am going to have to disagree on some of these points based on my experience. It may or may not be relevant to you.

I believe that active scilons "do" believe everything written just because LRon wrote it. He even said it (sort of): "If it isn't written it isn't true."

More to the point, let me tell you about the recruiters and regs bird-dogging the basic courses. They are waiting for the new public to "cognite". More specifically, they are watching for the first signs of the "big win". You remember, that's when you decided, "Hey, they really DO have something here. I feel great!" Once that "magical" moment occurs, they swoop in for the kill.

We'd bring them down to our offices and have them tell us how great they felt, etc. Next, we'd tell them, "See, we told you. Don't you want to help others to achieve the same thing (recruitment) or let me show you how we can solve all the rest of your problems (reg cycle).

The real message is: "Now you see that this is true, that just proves that ALL THE REST IS TRUE, too." This is further reinforced with the rest of those "warm culty techniques" of acceptance into our "special" group, strong support and agreement for your "wins", and specialized loaded language.

Oh, and scilons treat an attack on Scn as a PERSONAL attack on them. You'd really think they'd be a little more secure about their beliefs. Maybe every criticism or escapee reminds them way down deep that they're just being fooled again.

Finally, congratulations to you if you were able to resist this and fully embrace the "if it's not true for you, it's not true" philosophy. I wish I could have.
 
Top