Sindy
Crusader
Well, so far I am one-for-one on correctly predicting that the Indies would reject my review of DMSMH.
Here is my next prediction. . .
If I changed that one paragraph:
To:
Then they would censor and reject that Review too.
They are frauds. They say they want your "honest opinion" and "facts". But when I provide a link to HUBBARD SPEAKING IN HIS OWN WORDS ABOUT DMSMH, they reject it.
They even reject Ron's facts when it doesn't match their lies!!! LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Hipocrisy Hipocrisy Hooray!!!
It's the language you are using, I'm sure.
If you were to say that you were once very intrigued and a believer until you watched Ron, in his own words, explain how that what he originally attested to, regarding Dianetics and the state of Clear was untrue, then posted the video, the curiosity would lead people to see for themselves.
The loaded language ("fraud") will lead him (or whomever is reviewing the reviews) to believe that you are insincere or only have the purpose of being critical and unhelpful, that you have an "agenda".
You can call that censorship, I suppose. I think you could get the same thing posted in a different way and let the fraud speak for itself.
and... I love ya! (I have to disagree with you once a year or people will think you pay me or something - lol)
Last edited: