Kha Khan
Patron Meritorious
I thought that I would attempt to elucidate the Scientology, Independent Scientology, and Freezone Scientific Method.
The basic, fundamental principle, subject to the critical modifications set forth below, is that correlation, no matter how attenuated, equals causation.
Equally important, all positive outcomes subsequent to auditing or training are attributed to, and were caused by, that auditing or training. Thus:
Likewise equally important, and consistent with KSW No. 1, all negative outcomes subsequent to auditing or training are ignored, attributed to the PC or trainee, or interpreted as being positive. Thus:
The critical thing is to always "ruthlessly follow" the ten steps of KSW No. 1, and particularly Step 3, "Knowing it (i.e., the Tech) is correct." There is an irrebutable, irrefutable presumption that the Tech "is correct." And if someone suggests that the Tech is not correct? Yes, you recall, one must "jump down [their] throat" and find out what they did wrong.
Now, let us consider an example of the Scientology, Independent Scientology, and Freezone Scientific Method in action.
Consider the poor wog Clinical Psychologist who spent four years in college, four years in graduate school, obtained a Ph.D. in clinical psychology, did an internship in a "mental hospital," passed the state licensing exam, and is subject to state regulation. He deals with a "patient" who has problems with intimacy with her husband. She recounts that she was molested as a child. The poor psychologist, not having LRH Tech, talks endlessly with her, and then with both her and her husband in couple's therapy, obtaining only hard won, and perhaps never complete success.
Compare the Scientology Auditor armed with LRH Tech. This person did not have to waste four years in college and four years in graduate school. No, this person most efficiently dropped out of high school at age 14 to receive auditing training from others who, like him, dropped out of high school at age 14 to receive such training. The Auditor is not licensed or regulated by the wog state, but only by the Church of Scientology. The Auditor has a PC who expresses the very large and distracting PTP of having difficulty expressing intimacy with her husband. The PC reveals to the Auditor that she was molested as a child. Unlike the wog psychologist, the Auditor does not dwell on this incident, or talk about it at all, but correctly notes that it is not the first incident on the chain. No, the Auditor eventually causes the PC to recall that the first incident on the chain was when the PC was raped by Attila the Hun in the year 440 A.D. This, by definition (see KSW No.1, Step. No. 3 referred to above) must bring the PC relief. Unless, of course, the PC is PTS, or out ethics, or the husband is an SP, etc. -- all of which are remediable for the PC by further Scientology auditing and/or training at additional cost.
Why a wog psychologist would assume that the fact that a woman was molested this lifetime was the cause of her intimacy problems with her husband, when LRH Tech clearly establishes, and eventually caused the woman to recall, that she was raped by Attila the Hun, is of course difficult to understand.
Finally, it is important to note that Scientology, correctly applied, can never be harmful. Causing a woman who is having intimacy problems with her husband to finally recall that she was raped by Attila the Hun in the year 440 A.D. could not possibly be detrimental in any way.
The basic, fundamental principle, subject to the critical modifications set forth below, is that correlation, no matter how attenuated, equals causation.
Equally important, all positive outcomes subsequent to auditing or training are attributed to, and were caused by, that auditing or training. Thus:
- If anytime after receiving auditing the PC finds an open parking spot, his finding an open parking spot was clearly caused by his receipt of auditing.
- If anytime after receiving auditing the PC gets a part in a movie or TV show, her getting the part was clearly caused by her receipt of auditing.
- If anytime after receiving auditing the PC wins the lottery, his winning the lottery was clearly caused by his receipt of auditing.
- If anytime after completing the Pro TRs course the trainee gets a new job, the trainee getting the new job was clearly caused by his receipt of training.
Likewise equally important, and consistent with KSW No. 1, all negative outcomes subsequent to auditing or training are ignored, attributed to the PC or trainee, or interpreted as being positive. Thus:
- If after receving audting the PC loses his job, this outcome can, should and must be ignored.
- If after receving auditing the PC is unwilling to ignore the fact that he lost his job, this clearly means the PC was and is PTS, and a PTS handling is required.
- If after receiving auditing the PC loses his job, is unwilling to ignore this outcome, and is unwilling to accept the fact that he is PTS, and blames the loss of his job on all of the time he spent in the Org, the PC is an SP.
- Likewise, if immediately after the PC becomes a Grade 0 Release, the PC's wife divorces the PC and takes his children away to the opposite coast for the purported reason that the PC was spending too much time and money on the Church of Scientology, there was clearly no failure of the Grade 0 auditing to enable the PC to communicate freely with anyone, including his wife, on any subject. No, it is clear that the PC's wife is an evil SP, and he is better off without her and the children so he can concentrate on going up the Bridge to Total Freedom.
The critical thing is to always "ruthlessly follow" the ten steps of KSW No. 1, and particularly Step 3, "Knowing it (i.e., the Tech) is correct." There is an irrebutable, irrefutable presumption that the Tech "is correct." And if someone suggests that the Tech is not correct? Yes, you recall, one must "jump down [their] throat" and find out what they did wrong.
Now, let us consider an example of the Scientology, Independent Scientology, and Freezone Scientific Method in action.
Consider the poor wog Clinical Psychologist who spent four years in college, four years in graduate school, obtained a Ph.D. in clinical psychology, did an internship in a "mental hospital," passed the state licensing exam, and is subject to state regulation. He deals with a "patient" who has problems with intimacy with her husband. She recounts that she was molested as a child. The poor psychologist, not having LRH Tech, talks endlessly with her, and then with both her and her husband in couple's therapy, obtaining only hard won, and perhaps never complete success.
Compare the Scientology Auditor armed with LRH Tech. This person did not have to waste four years in college and four years in graduate school. No, this person most efficiently dropped out of high school at age 14 to receive auditing training from others who, like him, dropped out of high school at age 14 to receive such training. The Auditor is not licensed or regulated by the wog state, but only by the Church of Scientology. The Auditor has a PC who expresses the very large and distracting PTP of having difficulty expressing intimacy with her husband. The PC reveals to the Auditor that she was molested as a child. Unlike the wog psychologist, the Auditor does not dwell on this incident, or talk about it at all, but correctly notes that it is not the first incident on the chain. No, the Auditor eventually causes the PC to recall that the first incident on the chain was when the PC was raped by Attila the Hun in the year 440 A.D. This, by definition (see KSW No.1, Step. No. 3 referred to above) must bring the PC relief. Unless, of course, the PC is PTS, or out ethics, or the husband is an SP, etc. -- all of which are remediable for the PC by further Scientology auditing and/or training at additional cost.
Why a wog psychologist would assume that the fact that a woman was molested this lifetime was the cause of her intimacy problems with her husband, when LRH Tech clearly establishes, and eventually caused the woman to recall, that she was raped by Attila the Hun, is of course difficult to understand.
Finally, it is important to note that Scientology, correctly applied, can never be harmful. Causing a woman who is having intimacy problems with her husband to finally recall that she was raped by Attila the Hun in the year 440 A.D. could not possibly be detrimental in any way.
Last edited: